Skip to main content
Log in

An Analytical Expression for the Regulation of Ventricular Volume in the Normal and Diseased Heart

  • Published:
Cardiovascular Engineering: An International Journal

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the literature indicating that the volumetric regulation of the left ventricle (LV) and the right ventricle (RV) may be conveniently represented in a graph relating end-systolic volume (ESV) to end-diastolic volume (EDV). This view contrasts with the classical description by Starling's law, which for decades has dominated the analysis of volumetric input–output relationships of the heart. In the present study we critically survey the existing evidence for a graphical representation emphasizing the role of ESV rather than stroke volume (SV) as the dependent variable in the description of cardiac function. Mostly a linear relationship between ESV and EDV has been documented. This concept is now applied both in the study of a particular heart under consideration and in a population-based approach. We analyzed volumetric data obtained from human patients, instrumented conscious dogs, and healthy horses, and found linear relationships for volume and diameters. A distinct parallel leftward shift of the regression curve is found to be commensurate with diminished parasympathetic activity, whereas a clockwise rotation of the curve is associated with decreased sympathetic activity. The ensuing changing patterns of the ESV vs. EDV relationship have implications for ejection fraction, for which we derived an analytical formula to account for such dependence. Thus, the analytical expression of ESV vs. EDV provides a functional representation of factors regulating LV and RV volume. The new approach applies to both health and disease states, and is shown to be invariant for afterload variation, in contrast to the Starling curve. Moreover, it appears typically sensitive to various types of interventions, including those affecting chronotropic and inotropic state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abdulla AM, Frank MJ, Erdin RA, and Canedo MI. Clinical significance and hemodynamic correlates of the third heart sound gallop in aortic regurgitation. Circulation 64: 464–471, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier P, Solomon SB, Schiller NB, and Glantz SA. Left atrial relaxation and left ventricular systolic function determine left atrial reservoir function. Circulation 100: 427–436, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beringer JY and Kerkhof PLM. A unifying representation of ventricular volumetric indexes. IEEE Trans BME 45: 365–371, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucher CA, Bingham JB, Osbakken MD, Okada RD, Strauss HW, Block PC, Levine FH, Phillips HR, and Pohost GM. Early changes in left ventricular size and function after correction of left ventricular volume overload. Am J Cardiol 47: 991–1004, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristow JD, Ferguson RE, Mintz F, and Rapaport E. Thermodilution studies of ventricular volume changes due to isoproterenol and bleeding. J Appl Physiol 18: 129–133, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burwash IG, Morgan DE, Koilpillai CJ, Blackmore GL, Johnstone DE, and Armour JA. Sympathetic stimulation alters left ventricular relaxation and chamber size. Am J Physiol 33: R1–R7, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camm AJ and Malik M. (Eds). Heart Rate Variability. New York: Futura, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtois M, Mechem CJ, Barzilai B, and Ludbrook PA. Left ventricular pressure decay rate during isovolumic relaxation is preload dependent (abstract). JACC 21: 413A, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhainaut J-F, Pinsky MR, Nouria S, Slomka F, and Brunet F. Right ventricular function in human sepsis. Chest 112: 1043–1049, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge HT, and Baxley WA. Hemodynamic aspects of heart failure. Am J Cardiol 22: 24–30, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field BJ, Russell RO, Moraski RE, Soto B, Hood WP, Burdeshaw J, Smith M, Maurer BJ, and Rackley CE. Left ventricular size and function and heart size in the year following myocardial infarction. Circulation 50: 331–339, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinchcliff KW, McKeever KH, and Muir WW. Hemodynamic effects of atropine, dobutamine, nitroprusside, phenylephrine, and propranolol in conscious horses. J Vet Intern Med 5: 80–86, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt JP, Rhode EA, Peoples A, and Kines H. Left ventricular function in mammals of greatly different size. Circ Res 10: 798–806, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugenholtz PG, and Wagner HR. Assessment of Myocardial Function in Congenital Heart Disease. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1970, pp 201–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerkhof PLM. End-Systolic Volume and the Evaluation of Cardiac Pump Function: Studies in Animals and Man. PhD Thesis, Leiden University, 1981, ISBN 90–9000–203–0.

  • Kerkhof PLM, Baan J, Buis B, and Arntzenius AC. Relations between ejection fraction and ventricular volume, and their alteration by chronic beta-blockade. Br Heart J 46: 17–22, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerkhof PLM. Beat-to-beat analysis of high-fidelity signals obtained from the left ventricle and aorta in chronically instrumented dogs. Automedica 7: 83–90, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerkhof PLM, and Kresh JY. Cardiovascular function analysis. In Clinical Cardiac Assessment, Vol. 7: Interventions and Assist Technology. Basel: Karger, 1990, pp 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerkhof PLM, and Li J K-J. Fractional shortening of the left ventricle as analytically predicted in various species of widely differing body mass. In Proceedings of EMBS, Chicago, 1997. CD-ROMby IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerkhof PLM, Roos A, ter Haar G, Kocsis S, Pijnenburg HLM, and Stokhof AA. Age variance of left ventricular diameters in dogs with cardiac disease. J Gerontol Biol Sci 53: B25–B31, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerkhof PLM. Annotations regarding the Starling curve and rationale for an alternative approach. Comm Theor Biol 5: 437–453, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClain LC, Wright LD, Bose RK, Spratt JA, and Maier GW. Afterload sensitivity of nonlinear end-systolic pressure–volume relation vs preload recruitable stroke work in conscious dogs. J Surg Res 75: 6–17, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melbin J, Detweiler DK, Riffle RA, and Noordergraaf A. Coherence of cardiac output with rate changes. Am J Physiol 243: H499–H504, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller GAH, and Swan HJC. Effect of chronic pressure and volume overload on left heart volumes in subjects with congenital heart disease. Circulation 30: 205–216, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon JV, Murray RG, Leonard PD, Mitchell JH, and Blomqvist CG. Effect of large variations in preload on left ventricular performance characteristics in normal subjects. Circulation 65: 698–703, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble MIM, Wyler J, Milne ENC, and Trenchard D. Effect of changes in heart rate on left ventricular performance in conscious dogs. Circ Res 24: 285–290, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palladino JL, Mulier JP, and Noordergraaf A. On the independence of Starling's law. In Proceedings of IEEE Northeast Bioengineering Conference, 1996, pp 58–59.

  • Pouleur H, Rousseau MF, van Eyll C, Melin J, Youngblood M, and Yusuf S. Cardiac mechanics during development of heart failure. Circulation 87(Suppl. IV): 14–20, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renlund DG, Gerstenblith G, Fleg JL, Becker LC, and Lakatta EG. Interaction between left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes in normal humans. Am J Physiol 258: H473–H481, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigaud M, Rocha P, Boschat J, Farcot JC, Bardet J, and Bourdarias JP. Regional left ventricular function assessed by contrast angiography in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 60: 130–139, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robotham JL, Takata M, Berman M, and Harasawa Y. Ejection fraction revisited. Anesthesiology 74: 172–183, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma B, Goodwin JF, Raphael MJ, Steiner RE, Rainbow RG, and Taylor SH. Left ventricular angiography on exercise. Br Heart J 38: 59–70, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Baren PA, Knopjes SR, Voorhout G, and Kerkhof PLM. Development of left ventricular size in foals as a function of growth (abstract). J Mol Cell Cardiol 31: A107, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Laarse A, Kerkhof PLM, Vermeer F, Serruys PW, Hermens WT, Verheugt FWA, Bar FW, Krauss XH, van der Wal EE, and Simoons ML. Relation between infarct size and left ventricular performance assessed in patients with first acute myocardial infarction randomized to intracoronary thrombolytic therapy or to conventional treatment. Am J Cardiol 61: 1–7, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • White HD, Norris RM, Brown MA, Brandt PWT, Whitlock RML, and Wild CJ. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation 76: 44–51, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kerkhof, P.L.M., Li, J.KJ. & Kresh, J.Y. An Analytical Expression for the Regulation of Ventricular Volume in the Normal and Diseased Heart. Cardiovascular Engineering 2, 37–48 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020985118375

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020985118375

Navigation