Skip to main content
Log in

A Multilevel Analysis of the Effects of Parents, Teachers and Schools on Student Values

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Do schools influence the values of the students who attend them? This study examines the influence of parents, peer groups, teachers and the schools on student values as assessed by the Schwartz Value Survey. A sample of students at Grade 12 was chosen from 11 South Australian secondary schools of a wide variety of types, and the students, their parents and their teachers completed the Value Survey, and students also provided sociodemographic information. The data were analysed using the HLM multilevel analysis program with respect to the four higher order value components, namely self-transcendence, self-enhancement, conservation and openness to change in order to identify student level and school level effects on the values held by the students. Results showed that sex of student, language background, the Christian involvement of the student, parental social position and the values held by parents and peer groups had much greater effects upon the students' values than the schools and their teachers. Further research involving a larger number of schools in a wider variety of settings is suggested to build on this exploratory study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alwin, Duane F. (1989). Social stratification work and parental socialisation values. In N. Eisenberg, J. Reykowski & J. Staub (Eds.), Social and moral values. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; pp. 327-346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astill, Brian R. (1998a). Influences on the social values of Year 12 students: A South Australian study. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, The Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astill, Brian R. (1998b). Yes! Christians ARE different: but are their schools? Journal of Christian Education 41(2), 27-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, Anthony S. & Raudenbush, Stephen W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis. California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, Lee J. & Webb, Noreen (1975). Behaviour and within-class effects in a repeated aptitude-treatment interaction: Reanalysis of a study by G.L Anderson. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(6), 717-724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, Norman T. (1975). Values in education in society. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, Norman T. (1980). Values in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, Norman T. (1995). Values, valences, and choice: The influence of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1135-1151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, Norman T. (1998). Reactions to penalties for offenses committed by the police and public citizens: Testing a socio-cognitive process model of retributive justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 528-544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, Norman T. (1999). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. New York: Kluwer/Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, Louis (1968). A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika, 33, 469-506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, Melvin L. (1977). Class & conformity (2nd edn.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W.S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351-357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohan, Meg J. & Zanna, Mark P. (1994). Value transmission in families. In C. Seligman, J.M. Olson & M.P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokeach, Milton (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Shalom (1992). Universals in the structure and content of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25). New York: Academic Press, pp. 1-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Shalom (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shye, Samuel (1985). Smallest space analysis. In T. Husen & T.N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of education. Oxford: Pergammon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiele, Colin (1975). Grains of mustard seed. Adelaide: South Australian Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, Paul (1977). Learning to labour. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Astill, B.R., Feather, N.T. & Keeves, J.P. A Multilevel Analysis of the Effects of Parents, Teachers and Schools on Student Values. Social Psychology of Education 5, 345–363 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020982517173

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020982517173

Keywords

Navigation