Abstract
Mathematics educators and researchers generally recognise the importance of students' active involvement in learning processes; this active engagement is positively thought of in relation to the development of understanding and the construction of mathematical knowledge. However, it is often not well understood, nor perhaps even considered, how engagement in these learning processes also produces the learner and his/her feelings of competence and confidence in/with mathematics. In this paper I undertake, from a post structuralist perspective, a meta-analysis of two short episodes from a paper by Manouchehri and Goodman (2000). I use these interactions to explore (a) how mathematical knowledge and identities are produced in teaching/learning interactions in the classroom and (b) the wider practical implications of this productive power ofprocess for mathematics education and research. Through analyses such as these it may be possible to breathe new life and purpose into mathematics education in the twenty-first century; not by negating what has come before, but in moving on to explore the exciting possibilities that present themselves when taken-for-granted assumptions of a rational, freely choosing ‘proficient’ (NCTM, 2000) humanist subject are interrupted and revised.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Adams St. Pierre, E.: 2000, 'Poststructural feminism in education', Qualitative Studies in Education 13(5), 477–415.
Australian Education Council: 1990, A National Statement on Mathematics for Australian Schools, Curriculum Corporation, Canberra.
Butler, J.: 1997, The Psychic Life of Power, Stanford University Press, Stanford CA.
Confrey, J.: 2000, 'Leveraging constructivism to apply to systemic reform', Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education 8(3), 7–30.
Davies, B.: 1991, 'The concept of agency', Social Analysis 30, 42–3.
Davies, B.: 1994, Poststructuralist Theory and Classroom Practice, Deakin University Press, Geelong.
Foss, D. and Kleinsasser, R.: 2001, 'Contrasting research perspectives: what the evidence yields', Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 7(3), 271–295.
Gregg, J.: 1995, 'The tensions and contradictions of the school mathematics tradition', Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 26(5), 442–466.
Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Urwin, C., Venn, C. and Walkerdine, V.: 1984, Changing the Subject, Methuen, London.
Hughes, M. Desforges, C. and Mitchell, C. with Carre, C.: 2000, Numeracy and Beyond, Open University Press, Buckingham.
Kilpatrick, J. and Silver, E.: 2000, 'Unfinished business: Challenges for mathematics educators in the next decade', in M. Burke and F. Curcio (eds.), Learning Mathematics for a New Century, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA, pp. 223–236.
Lather, P.: 1991, Getting Smart, Routledge, New York.
Lave, J.: 1997, 'The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding', in D. Kirshner and J. Whitson (eds.), Situated Cognition, Lawrence Erlbaum, London, pp. 17–36.
Lerman, S.: 2000, 'A case of interpretations of social: A response to Steffe and Thompson', Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 31(2), 210–227.
Manouchehri, A. and Goodman, T.: 2000, 'Implementing mathematics reform: The challenge within', Educational Studies in Mathematics 42, 1–34.
McNaughton, G.: 2000, Rethinking Gender in Early Childhood Education, Allen and Unwin, St Leonards, NSW.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM): 2000, Principles and Standards for School Mathematics, NCTM, Reston, VA.
Usher. R. and Edwards, R.: 1994, Postmodernism and Education, Routledge, London.
Walkerdine, V.: 1988, The Mastery of Reason, Routledge, London.
Willoughby, S.: 2000, 'Perspectives on mathematics education', in M. Burke and F. Curcio (eds.), Learning Mathematics for a New Century, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA, pp. 1–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klein, M. Teaching mathematics in/for new times: A poststructuralist analysis of the productive quality of the pedagogic process . Educational Studies in Mathematics 50, 63–78 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020566020275
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020566020275