Skip to main content
Log in

Production of Sinter of a Prescribed Chemical Composition

  • Published:
Metallurgist Aims and scope

Abstract

Improving the quality of the iron-ore-based materials used in blast-furnace smelting is an effective means of reducing coke consumption and improving the other technical-economic indices that characterize the production of pig iron. One important factor in solving this problem is narrowing the range of fluctuation of the iron content and basicity of the sinter. The chemical composition of sinter can be stabilized by carefully averaging the iron ores used to make the sinter. However, since such averaging is precluded by the limited storage space available at the sinter plant of ISPAT-Karmet, the combine has developed a technology to make sinter of stable chemical composition. The key elements of the technology: obtaining representative samples of the materials; forming piles of mixtures of ores; calculating the chemical composition of the planned piles; determining consumption factors for the components of the charge, in order to obtain sinter of the prescribed chemical composition; using an express method to determine the losses incurred during sintering; statistically analyzing the quality of the charge components and the sinter. The use of this technology for multicomponent charges in the sinter shop at ISPAT-Karmet has appreciably stabilized the chemical composition of the sinter – the standard deviation is now 0.295–0.311% for iron content and 0.031–0.037 for basicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vikulov, G.S., Vilkov, A.E., Kabanov, Y.A. et al. Production of Sinter of a Prescribed Chemical Composition. Metallurgist 46, 174–177 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020484920155

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020484920155

Keywords

Navigation