Skip to main content
Log in

Supervision as a Disciplined Focus on Self and Not the Other: A Different Systems Model

  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This Self-Based Supervision (SBS) model developed out of experience, and operates from a framework of nature and systems theory where language is a process of coordination among humans as living systems. With this specific understanding of language, supervision as conversation is the mode for experimentation with change. The model is presented conceptually and then described with examples of supervisees at different stages of supervision. Rather than being prescriptive, the author offers the model primarily as a stimulus for the further development of systems thinking and supervision. The article concludes that the systemic changes that occur in this supervision can extend to affect larger social systems as supervisees operate on principle and function as leaders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy (AAMFT). (1997). AAMFT Approved Supervisor designation: Standards and responsibilities handbook.Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, H., & Goolishian, H. (1988). Human systems as linguistic systems: Preliminary and evolving ideas about the implications for clinical theory. Family Process, 27, 371–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1996). The web of life. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Shazer, S. (1991). Putting differences to work. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, T. (1997). The symbolic species. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekstein, R. (1964). Supervision of psychotherapy: Is it teaching? Is it administration? Or is it therapy? Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 1, 137–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. C. (1994). The evolution of antibiotic resistance: A modern catastrophe. Bios, 65(3), 133–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, E. (1995). Clinical supervision: A systems approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosford, R. E., & Barmann, B. (1983). A social learning approach to counselor supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11(1), 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes, M. (1996). Connecting Bowen theory with its human origins. Family Process, 35, 487–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, T. L. (1992). The supervisory relationship: An identification of the primary elements in the relationship and an application of two theories of ethical relationships. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 18, 283–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, M., & Bowen, M. (1988). Family evaluation. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, M. E. (1984). Theoretical base for differentiation of self in one's family of origin. In C. E. Munson (Ed.), Family of origin applications in clinical supervision (pp. 13–36). New York: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddle, H. A., Breunlin, D. C., & Schwartz, R. C. (Eds.) (1988). Handbook of family therapy training and supervision. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R. (1978). The biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In A. Miller & E. Lenneberg (Eds.), Psychology and biology of language and thought (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge. Boston: New Science Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montalvo, B., & Storm, C. (1997). Live supervision revolutionizes the supervision process. In T. Todd & C. Storm (Eds.), The complete systemic supervisor: Context, philosophy, and pragmatics (pp. 283–297). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papero, D. (1988). Training in Bowen theory. In H. A. Liddle, D. C. Breunlin, & R. C. Schwartz (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy training and supervision (pp. 62–77). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C. H. (1983). A client-centered approach to supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11(1), 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perls, F., Hefferline, R., & Goodman, P. (1951). Gestalt therapy: Excitement and growth in the human personality. New York: Julian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Protinsky, H. (1997). Dismounting the tiger: Using tape in supervision. In T. Todd & C. Storm (Eds.), The complete systemic supervisor: Context, philosophy, and pragmatics (pp. 298–307). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprenkle, Douglas, H. (1999). Toward a general model of family therapy supervision: Comment on Roberts, Winek, and Mulgrew. Contemporary Family Therapy, 21, 309–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, T., & Storm, C. (Eds.) (1997). The complete systemic supervisor: Context, philosophy, and pragmatics. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory. New York: George Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M., & Epston, D. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schur, T.J. Supervision as a Disciplined Focus on Self and Not the Other: A Different Systems Model. Contemporary Family Therapy 24, 399–422 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019874114316

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019874114316

Navigation