Skip to main content
Log in

Stochastic Optimization of Insurance Portfolios for Managing Exposure to Catastrophic Risks

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A catastrophe may affect different locations and produce losses that are rare and highly correlated in space and time. It may ruin many insurers if their risk exposures are not properly diversified among locations. The multidimentional distribution of claims from different locations depends on decision variables such as the insurer's coverage at different locations, on spatial and temporal characteristics of possible catastrophes and the vulnerability of insured values. As this distribution is analytically intractable, the most promising approach for managing the exposure of insurance portfolios to catastrophic risks requires geographically explicit simulations of catastrophes. The straightforward use of so-called catastrophe modeling runs quickly into an extremely large number of “what-if” evaluations. The aim of this paper is to develop an approach that integrates catastrophe modeling with stochastic optimization techniques to support decision making on coverages of losses, profits, stability, and survival of insurers. We establish connections between ruin probability and the maximization of concave risk functions and we outline numerical experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Amendola, Y. Ermoliev, T. Ermolieva, V. Gitits, G. Koff and J. Linnerooth-Bayer, A systems approach to modeling catastrophic risk and insurability, Natural Hazards Journal (forthcoming).

  2. K.J. Arrow, The theory of risk-bearing: Small and great risks, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 12 (1996) 103–111.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Beard, T. Pentikainen and E. Pesonen, Risk Theory (University Printing House, Cambridge, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Borch, Equilibrium in a reinsurance market, Econometrica 30(3) (1962) 424–444.

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Buhlmann, Mathematical Methods in Risk Theory (Springer, New York, 1970).

  6. B. Digas, Generators of seismic events and losses: Scenario-based insurance optimization, IIASA Interim Report IR–98–079 (1998).

  7. Y.M. Ermoliev, T.Y. Ermolieva, G.J. MacDonald and V.I. Norkin, On the design of catastrophic risk portfolios, IIASA Interim Report IR–98–056 (1998).

  8. Y.M. Ermoliev and V.I. Norkin, Stochastic generalized gradient method with application to insurance risk management, IIASA Interim Report IR–97–021 (1997), Kibernetika i Sistemnyi Analiz 2 (1998) 50–71.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Y.M. Ermoliev and V.I. Norkin, On nonsmooth and discontinuous problems of stochastic systems optimization, European Journal of Operational Research 101(2) (1997) 230–244.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y.M. Ermoliev and V.I. Norkin, Monte Carlo optimization and path dependent nonstationary laws of large numbers, IIASA Interim Report IR–98–009 (1998).

  11. Y. Ermoliev and R. Wets, Numerical Techniques for Stochastic Optimization (Computational Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  12. T.Y. Ermolieva, The design of optimal insurance decisions in the presence of catastrophic risks, IIASA Interim Report IR–97–068 (1997).

  13. V. Ginsburg and M. Keyzer, The Structure of Applied General Equilibrium Models (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Insurance Service Office, The Impact of Catastrophes on Property Insurance (Insurance Service Of-fice, New York, 1994).

  15. H. Konno and H. Yamazaki, Mean absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its application to Tokyo stock market, Management Science 37 (1991) 519–531.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G.J. MacDonald, Persistance in Climate, JSR–91–340 (The MITRE Corporation, McLean, Verginia, 22102–3481, 1992).

  17. H.M. Markowitz, Mean Variance Analysis in Portfolio Choice and Capital Markets (Blackwell, Oxford, 1987).

  18. O. Pavlov, G. Koff and N. Frolova, Seismic hazard and seismic risk mapping for Irkutsk city, in: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Seismic Zonation, Nice, France (1995) pp. 1999–2019.

  19. E.L. Pugh, A gradient technique of adaptive Monte Carlo, SIAM Review 8(3) (1966) 346–355.

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. Raik, Qualitative investigation of nonlinear stochastic programming problems, Izvestia Akademii Nauk Estonskoi SSR, Fizika i Matematika (Communications of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, Physics and Mathematics) 21(1) (1971) 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J.M. Stone, A theory of capacity and the insurance of catastrophe risks, Parts 1, 2, The Journal of Risk and Insurance 40 (1973) 231–244 and 339–355.

    Google Scholar 

  22. G.R.Walker, Current developments in catastrophe modeling, in: Financial Risk Management for Natural Catastrophes, eds. N.R. Britton and J. Oliver, Aon Group Australia Limited, Griffith University, Brisbane (1997) pp. 17–35.

  23. R.J.-B.Wets, Challenges in stochastic programming, Mathematical Programming 75 (1996) 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ermoliev, Y., Ermolieva, T., MacDonald, G. et al. Stochastic Optimization of Insurance Portfolios for Managing Exposure to Catastrophic Risks. Annals of Operations Research 99, 207–225 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019244405392

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019244405392

Navigation