Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Arrow: A flexible architecture for an accounting and charging infrastructure in the Next Generation Internet

  • Published:
NETNOMICS Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current pricing and charging methods for the Internet are not based on actual usage of this service, which leads to unfairness and more important, it does not deliver the right signals through financial incentives to network providers to upgrade critical links of their networks. The development of new multimedia applications and the convergence to an integrated services network will foster the tremendous growth of the Internet even more. With the Next Generation Internet not only technical services like bandwidth reservation will be introduced, but also new applications will emerge within the Internet.

Charging the Internet in a fashion that provides feedback to users and providers has been proposed since the early '90s, however, only a few implementations and real-world examples are known today. This is due to subsidizing the Internet in its early stages and due to a technical development that did not care much about charging. With the recent redesign of the Internet protocol suite and discussions on multiple service classes in the Internet, architectures for charging and accounting have to be revisited, too.

Economic models for the Internet cannot be tested fully and validated in non-real-world environments, because of the unknown user behavior. With this uncertainty over what models and pricing schemes to choose, it is evident that a specific charging and accounting platform will never be accepted by the community. In this paper a novel and flexible architecture for charging and accounting is proposed that provides a wide range of mechanisms and lets researchers experiment in an environment as close as possible to the targeted system. As a first step, four different pricing schemes are described, qualitatively assessed on the proposed platform, and a prototypical implementation performed. One of the economic models that have been implemented on Arrow is based on different service classes including reservation and recalculates prices dynamically depending on the traffic situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Braden, D.D. Clark and S. Shenker, Integrated services in the Internet architecture: An overview, Request for Comments, RFC 1633, Internet Engineering Task Force (June 1994).

  2. R. Braden and D. Hoffman, RAPI - An RSVP application programming interface, Internet Draft (June 1997).

  3. S. Bradner and A. Mankin, The recommendation for the IP next generation protocol, Request for Comments, RFC 1752, Internet Engineering Task Force (January 1995).

  4. N. Brownlee, C. Mills and G. Ruth, Traffic flow measurement: Architecture, Request for Comments, RFC 2063, Internet Engineering Task Force (January 1997).

  5. M. Carter and G. Guthrie, Pricing Internet: The New Zealand experience, Department of Economics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand (December 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Chaum, Achieving electronic privacy, Sci. Amer. (August 1992) 96–100.

  7. D.D. Clark, A model for cost allocation and pricing in the Internet, in: MIT Workshop on Internet Economics (March 1995).

  8. R. Cocchi, D. Estrin, S. Shenker and L. Zhang, A study of priority pricing in multiple service class networks, ACM Comput. Commun. Rev. 21(4) (1991) 123–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Cocchi, S. Shenker, D. Estrin and L. Zhang, Pricing in computer networks: Motivation, formulation and example, IEEE/ACM Trans. Network. 1(6) (1993) 614–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Decasper, M. Waldvogel, Z. Dittia, H. Adiseshu, G. Parulkar and B. Plattner, Crossbow - A toolkit for integrated services over cell-switched IPv6, in: Proc. of the IEEE ATM '97 Workshop, Lisboa, Portugal (June 1997).

  11. S. Deering and R. Hinden, Internet protocol, version 6 (IPv6) specification, Request for Comments, RFC 1883, Internet Engineering Task Force (December 1996).

  12. R.J. Edell, N. McKeown and P.P. Varaiya, Billing users and pricing for TCP, IEEE J. Selected Areas Commun. 13(7) (1995) 1162–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. H. Eriksson, MBONE: The multicast backbone, Commun. ACM 37(8) (1994) 54–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D. Estrin and L. Zhang, Design considerations for usage accounting and feedback in Internetworks, ACM Comput. Commun. Rev. 20(5) (1990) 56–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J.L. Hennessy, Computer Architecture, A Quantitative Approach (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  16. B-ISDN ATM layer cell transfer performance, International Telecommunication Union, Recommendation I.356 (November 1993).

  17. J.K. MacKie-Mason and H.R. Varian, Pricing the Internet, Technical Report, University of Michigan, Michigan (February 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Müller, Analyse und Entwurf von Tarifierungsmodellen für Kommunikationsdienste, Term Work, Institut für Technische Informatik und Kommunikationsnetze, ETH Zürich, Switzerland (June 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Parris, S. Keshav and D. Ferrari, A framework for the study of pricing in integrated networks, Technical Report TR-92-016, International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, CA (March 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Postel, Internet protocol, DARPA Internet program protocol specification, Request for Comments, RFC 791, Internet Engineering Task Force (September 1981).

  21. Raw data: More phones, more money, Wired Magazine No. 5.06 (June 1997) 80.

  22. S. Shenker, Service models and pricing policies for an integrated services Internet, in: MIT Workshop on Internet Economics (March 1995).

  23. S. Shenker, D. Clark, D. Estrin and S. Herzog, Pricing in computer networks: Reshaping the research agenda, ACM Comput. Commun. Rev. 26(2) (1996) 19–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. D. Tennenhouse, Personal communication (November 21, 1996).

  25. The White House, Office of the Press Secretary, Background on Clinton-Gore administrations Next-Generation Internet initiative, Press Release (October 1996).

  26. J. Wroclawski, The use of RSVP with IETF integrated services, Internet Draft (September 1996).

  27. L. Zhang, S. Deering, D. Estrin, S. Shenker and D. Zappala, RSVP: A new resource reservation protocol, IEEE Networks Magazine 31(9) (1993) 8–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory, TIK, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH Zürich, Gloriastrasse 35, CH-8092, Zürich, Switzerland

    George Fankhauser, Burkhard Stiller & Bernhard Plattner

Authors
  1. George Fankhauser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Burkhard Stiller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bernhard Plattner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fankhauser, G., Stiller, B. & Plattner, B. Arrow: A flexible architecture for an accounting and charging infrastructure in the Next Generation Internet. NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking 1, 201–223 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019162124120

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019162124120

Search

Navigation