Skip to main content
Log in

In Vitro-In Vivo Evaluation of a Controlled Release Buccal Bioadhesive Device for Oral Drug Delivery

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. To investigate the use of buccal bioadhesive device in targeting controlled drug delivery to the gastrointestinal tract.

Methods. A three-leg crossover study was designed to evaluate the application of buccal bioadhesive device for providing controlled drug delivery to the gastrointestinal tract of a model drug cyanocobalamin in four healthy adult male beagle dogs.

Results. In vitro dissolution studies using deionized water as the medium indicated that 100% of the drug was released within 15 min from a immediate release oral capsule formulation, whereas 90% of the drug was released within a period of 18 hrs from a buccal bioadhesive device formulation. Drug release from the buccal bioadhesive devices appeared to follow Higuchi's square root of time dependent model. The terminal half-life of the drug following I.V. administration in four dogs was found to be 16.4 ± 2.4 hrs. Following immediate release oral capsule administration of the drug Cmax, tmax and bioavailability were 2333 ± 1469 ng/L, 2.5± 1.0 hrs and 14.1 ± 7.9%, respectively. Following buccal bioadhesive device administration of the drug Cmax, tmax and bioavailability were 4154 ± 1096 ng/L, 11 ± 1.2 hrs and 35.8 ± 4.1%, respectively. Significantly higher bioavailability of the drug was observed with the buccal bioadhesive device administration when compared to the immediate release oral capsule.

Conclusions. The buccal bioadhesive device appears to improve the oral bioavailability of cyanocobalamin by providing controlled delivery of the drug to the gastrointestinal tract.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. M. M. Veillard, M. A. Longer, T. W. Martens, and J. R. Robinson. Preliminary studies of oral mucosal delivery of peptide drugs. J. Contr. Rel. 6:123–131 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Ponchel. Formulation of oral mucosal drug delivery systems for the systemic delivery of bioactive materials. Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 13:75–87 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Nagai and Y. Machida. Buccal delivery systems using hydrogels. Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 11:179–191 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. J. Pimlott and M. Addy. Evaluation of a method to study uptake of prednisolone sodium phosphate from different oral mucosal sites. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 60:35–37 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Ishida, N. Nambu, and T. Nagai. Mucosal dosage form of lidocaine for toothache using hydroxypropyl cellulose and carbopol. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 30:980–989 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Nagai and R. Konishi. Buccal/gingival drug delivery systems. J. Contr. Rel. 6:353–360 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Nagai, Y. Machida, and R. Konishi. Bioadhesive dosage forms for buccal/gingival administration. In V. Lenaerts and R. Gurny (eds.), Bioadhesive Drug Delivery Systems, CRC press, Florida, 1990, pp. 142.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Nozaki, M. Kakumoto, M. Ohta, K. Yukimutsu, and Y. W. Chien. A new transmucosal therapeutic system. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 19:221–275 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. A. Peppas and J. R. Robinson. Bioadhesives for optimization of drug delivery. J. Drug Target. 3:183–184 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Bottenberg, R. Cleymae, C. Muynck, J. P. Remon, D. Coomans, Y. Michotte, and D. Slop. Development and testing of bioadhesive fluoride-containing slow-release tablets for oral use. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 43:457–464 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Bottenberg, R. Cleymae, C. Muynck, J. P. Remon, D. Coomans, and D. Slop. Comparison of salivary fluoride concentrations after administration of a bioadhesive slow-release tablet and a conventional fluoride tablet. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 44:684–686 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Tiwari, D. Goldman, R. Sause, and P. L. Madan. Evaluation of polyoxyethylene homopolymers for buccal bioadhesive drug delivery device formulations. Pharm. Res. 14:S–151 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. B. Bailey. Vitamin chart no. 12. Nutr. Support Serv. 11:24 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Schumann, H. G. Classen, M. Hages, R. Prinz-Langenohl, K. Pietrzik, and H. K. Biesalski. Bioavailability of oral vitamins, minerals, and trace elements in perspective. Arzneim. Forsch. 47:369–380 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. M. Scott. Bioavailability of vitamin B12. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 51:S49–S53 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Doscherholmen and P. S. Hagen. A dual mechanism of Vitamin B12 plasma absorption. J. Clin. Invest. 36:1551–1557 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. L. Smith. Absorption, excretion, & distribution in the body. In R. Peter and F. G. Young (eds.), Methuen's Monographs on Biochemical Subjects, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1965, pp. 132–133.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. L. Cheng, S. H. Gehrke, and W. A. Ritschel. Development of an azopolymer based colonic release capsule for delivering proteins/macromolecules. Methods Find Exp. Clin. Pharmacol. 16:271–278 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. Geisslinger, S. Menzel, O. Zoller, Zh. Cheng, and K. Brune. Absorption and distribution of ibuprofen and acetylsalicyic acid formulations. Drug Invest. 7:52–55 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Gibaldi and P. Perrier, Estimation of Areas—Appendix D. In J. Swarbick (ed.), Pharmacokinetics, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1982, pp. 445–449.

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. Li, P. P. Bhatt, and T. P. Johnston. Transmucosal delivery of oxytocin to rabbits using a mucoadhesive buccal patch. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2:265–274 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  22. K. C. Kwan, M. R. Dobrinska, J. D. Rogers, A. E. Till, and K. C. Yeh. Bioapharamceutics. In L. Lachman, H. A. Lieberman, and J. L. Kanig (eds.), The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy, Lea & Febiger, Pennsylvania, 1986, pp. 215–216.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Helliwell. The use of bioadhesives in targeted delivery within the gastrointestinal tract. Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 11:221–251 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Rubinstein and B. Tirosh. Mucus gel thickness and turnover in the gastrointestinal tract of the rat: response to cholinergic stimulus and implication for mucoadhesion. Pharm. Res. 11:794–799 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tiwari, D., Goldman, D., Town, C. et al. In Vitro-In Vivo Evaluation of a Controlled Release Buccal Bioadhesive Device for Oral Drug Delivery. Pharm Res 16, 1775–1780 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018922503145

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018922503145

Navigation