Skip to main content
Log in

Inhibition of carcinoma cell invasion and liver metastases formation by the cysteine proteinase inhibitor E-64

  • Published:
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cysteine proteinases, in particular cathepsins B and L, have been implicated in tumor invasion and are thought to be important mediators of metastasis. Using two clonal sublines of the Lewis lung carcinoma with distinct patterns of metastasis, we previously reported that H-59 carcinoma cells, which are highly invasive and preferentially metastatic to the liver, express high levels of cathepsin L and lower levels of cathepsin B whereas M-27 cells which are less invasive and only moderately metastatic to the lung express cathepsin B only. In the present study, the role of these enzymes in invasion and metastasis, in particular the involvement of cysteine proteinases in liver metastasis of H-59 cells was further investigated. Using a reconstituted basement membrane (Matrigel) invasion assay we found that the cysteine proteinase inhibitor, E-64, blocked the invasion of H-59 cells under conditions which did not affect cell viability. A more minor but significant inhibitory effect (up to 32%) was also seen with the propeptide of cathepsin B, implicating this enzyme in the invasion process. Furthermore, treatment of H-59 cells with E-64 inhibited experimental liver metastases formation by up to 90%. On the other hand, invasion of M-27 cells could not be blocked by cysteine proteinase inhibitors even under conditions which resulted in complete abrogation of intracellular enzymatic activity, as assessed using synthetic substrates. Together, these results confirm our previous conclusion that the two carcinoma sublines utilize distinct proteolytic mechanisms for invasion and identify the cysteine proteinases as key mediators of H-59 carcinoma invasion and metastasis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liotta LA, Rao CN and Barsky SH, 1983, Tumor invasion and the extracellular matrix. Lab Invest, 49, 636–49.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Liotta LA, Steeg PS and Stetler-Stevenson WG, 1991, Cancer metastasis and angiogenesis: an imbalance of positive and negative regulation. Cell, 64, 327–36.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liotta LA, Tryggvason K, Garbisa S, et al.1980, Metastatic potential correlates with enzymatic degradation of basement membrane collagen. Nature, 284, 67–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Murphy G, Reynolds JJ and Hembry RM, 1989, Metalloproteinases and cancer invasion and metastasis. Int J Cancer, 44, 757–60.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mignatti P, Robbins E and Rifkin DB, 1986, Tumor invasion through the human amniotic membrane: requirement for a proteinase cascade. Cell, 47, 487–98.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sato H, Takino T, Okada Y, et al.1994, A matrix metalloproteinase expressed on the surface of invasive tumor cells. Nature, 370, 61–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brodt P, Reich R, Moroz LA and Chambers AF, 1992, Differences in the repertoires of basement membrane degrading enzymes in two carcinoma sublines with distinct patterns of site-selective metastasis. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1139, 77–83.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barrett AJ, Kembhavi AA, Brown MA, et al.1982, Ltrans-epoxisuccinyl-leucylamido(4-guanidino)butane (E-64) and its analogues as inhibitors of cysteine proteinases including cathepsins B, H and L. Biochem J, 201, 189–98.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Umezawa H, 1976, Structures and activities of protease inhibitors of microbial origin. Meth Enzymol, 45, 678–95.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fox T, De Miguel E, Mort JS and Storer AC, 1992, Potent slow-binding inhibition of cathepsin B by its propeptide. Biochemistry, 31, 12571–6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dipasquale G, Caccese R, Pasternak R, et al.1986, Proteoglycan and collagen-degrading enzymes from human interleukin (IL-1) stimulated chondrocytes from several species: proteoglycanase and collagenase inhibitors as potentially new disease-modifying antiarthritic agents. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med, 183, 262–7.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carmichael J, Degraff WG, Gazdar AF, et al.1987, Evaluation of a tetrazolium-based semiautomated colorimetric assay: assessment of chemosensitivity testing. Cancer Res, 47, 936–42.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chomczynski P and Sacchi N, 1987, Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanatephenol-chloroform extraction. Analyt Biochem, 162, 156–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reponen P, Sahlberg C, Huhtala P, et al.1992, Molecular cloning of murine 72-kDa type IV collagenase and its expression during mouse development. J Biol Chem, 267, 7856–62.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Feinberg V and Vogelstein BA, 1984, Technique for labelling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specificity. Analyt Biochem, 132, 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Long L, Nip J and Brodt P, 1994, Paracrine growth stimulation by hepatocyte-derived insulin-like growth factor-1: a regulatory mechanism for carcinoma cells metastatic to the liver. Cancer Res, 54, 3732–7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Barrett AJ and Kirschke H, 1981, Cathepsin B, cathepsin H, and cathepsin L. Meth Enzymol, 80, 535–61.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rozhin J, Robinson D, Stevens MA, et al.1987, Properties of a plasma membrane-associated cathepsin B-like cysteine proteinase in metastatic B16 melanoma variants. Cancer Res, 47, 6620–8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Asao T, Shibata HR, Batist G and Brodt P, 1992, Eradication of hepatic metastases of carcinoma H-59 by combination chemoimmunotherapy with liposomal muramyl tripeptide, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin. Cancer Res, 52, 6254–7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wexler H, 1966, Accurate identification of experimental pulmonary metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst, 36, 641–5.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Buck MR, Roth MJ, Zhuang Z, et al.1994, Increased gelatinase A (MMP-2) and cathepsin B activity in invasive tumor regions of human colon cancer samples. Am J Pathol, 145, 1285–90.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yagel S, Warner AH, Nellans HN, et al.1989, Suppression by cathepsin L inhibitors of the invasion of amnion membranes by murine cancer cells. Cancer Res, 49, 3553–7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sloane BF, Moin K and Lah TT, 1994, Regulation of lysosomal endopeptidase in malignant neoplasia. In: Pretlow TG and Pretlow TP, eds. Aspects of the Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Tumors. New York: Academic Press, pp. 411–66.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Denhardt DT, Greenberg AH, Egan SE, et al.1987, Cathepsin L expression correlates closely with the metastatic potential of H-ras-transformed murine fibroblasts. Oncogene, 2, 55–9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sloane BF, Moin K, Krepela E and Rozhin J, 1990, Cathepsin B and its endogenous inhibitors: the role in tumor malignancy. Cancer Metastasis Rev, 9, 333–52.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sloane BF, Moin K, Sameni M, et al.1994, Membrane association of cathepsin B can be induced by transfection of human breast epithelial cells with c-Ha-rasoncogene. J Cell Sci, 107, 373–84.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cardozo C, 1992, Degradation of rat lung collagens by cathepsin B. J Lab Clin Med, 119, 169–75.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Buck MR, Karustis DG, Day NA, et al.1992, Degradation of extracellular-matrix proteins by human cathepsin B from normal and tumour tissues. Biochem J, 282, 273–8.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sires UI, Schmid TM, Fliszar CJ, et al.1995, Complete degradation of type X collagen requires the combined action of interstitial collagenase and osteoclast-derived cathepsin B. JClin Invest, 95, 2089–95.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kobayashi H, Ohi H, Sugimura M, et al.1992, Inhibition of In vitroovarian cancer cell invasion by modulation of urokinase-type plasminogen activator and cathepsin B. Cancer Res, 52, 3610–14.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mort JS and Recklies AD, 1996, Lysosomal endoproteases, In: Brodt P, ed. Cell Adhesion and Invasion in Cancer Metastasis. Austin, Texas: Springer, pp. 151–64.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Velasco G, Ferrando AA, Punete XS, et al.1994, Human cathepsin D. Molecular cloning from a breast carcinoma, production of the active enzyme in Escherichia coli, and expression analysis in human tissues. J Biol Chem, 269, 27136–42.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Boike G, Lah T, Sloane BF, et al.1991, A possible role for cysteine proteinase and its inhibitors in motility of malignant melanoma and other tumour cells. Melanoma Res, 1, 333–40.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Redwood MS, Liu BCS, Weiss RE, et al.1992, Abrogation of the invasion of human bladder tumor cells by using protease inhibitor(s). Cancer, 69, 1212–19.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Leto G, Pizzolanti G, Tumminello FM and Gebbia N, 1994, Effects of E-64 (cysteine-proteinase inhibitor) and pepstatin (aspartyl-proteinase inhibitor) on metastasis formation in mice with mammary and ovarian tumors. In Vivo, 8, 231–6.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Koop S, MacDonald IC, Luzzi K, et al.1995, Fate of melanoma cells entering the microcirculation: over 80% survive and extravasate. Cancer Res, 55, 2520–3.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Martinez-Hernandez A, 1984, The hepatic extracellular matrix. I. Electron immunohistochemical studies in normal rat liver. Lab Invest, 51, 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Shoji-Kasai Y, Senshu M, Iwashita S and Imahori K, 1988, Thiol protease-specific inhibitor E-64, arrests human epidermoid carcinoma A 431 cells at mitotic metaphase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 85, 146–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Navab, R., Mort, J.S. & Brodt, P. Inhibition of carcinoma cell invasion and liver metastases formation by the cysteine proteinase inhibitor E-64. Clin Exp Metastasis 15, 121–129 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018496625936

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018496625936

Navigation