Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Collaboration of farmers and breeders: Participatory crop improvement in perspective

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Participatory Crop Improvement (PCI) has developed over the past decade as an alternative and complementary breeding approach to Formal Crop Improvement (FCI). In that context, PCI principally aims at more effectively addressing the needs of farmers in marginal areas in developing countries. This paper describes the rationale behind the emerging of the PCI-concept, the first experiences, and its place in a development-context. The relation with in situ conservation of plant genetic resources is briefly described. The paper uses the distinction in PCI between PVS (Participatory Varietal Selection, i.e. participatory selection among varieties and advanced materials) and PPB (Participatory Plant Breeding, i.e. selection within segregating materials). While successful experiences of PVS are reported, the potentials of PPB are still to be explored. Among other issues, this article pays attention to Genotype x Environment interaction: while G × E interaction is recognised as an important issue in plant breeding and a justification for PCI, the implications for the design of selection systems with farmer participation, and, eventually the potential of PPB has only been analysed to a limited extend. Questions in relation to materials, breeding strategies and selection procedures to achieve sufficient progress in the different crops and environments are identified; these will however remain unanswered until more experiences from the field are available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almekinders, C., W. de Boef & J. Engels, 2000.Synthesis between crop conservation and development. In: C. Almekinders & W. de Boef (Eds.), Encouraging Diversity. The conservation and development of plant genetic resources, pp. 330–338,Intermediate Technology Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almekinders, C. & D. Louette, 2000.Examples of innovations in local seed systems in Meso America. In: C. Almekinders & W. de Boef (Eds.), Encouraging Diversity. The conservation and development of plant genetic resources, pp.219–222.Intermediate Technology Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almekinders C. & N. Louwaars, 1999.Farmers' Seed production. New Approaches and Practices, 291 pp. Intermediate Technology Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almekinders, C.J.M., N.P. Louwaars & G.H. de Bruijn, 1994.Local seed systems and their importance for an imporoved seed supply in developing countries.Euphytica 78:207–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, P., F. Carrión & R. Calvo,1999.Selected maize statistics. In:CIMMYT 1997/98 World Maize Facts and Trends; Maize Productivity in Drought Stressed Environments: Technical Options and Research Resource Allocation, pp. 41–62.Mexico D.F., CIMMYT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, J.A., C.A. Quiros & Y.M. Rivers,1989.Farmer participation in technology development: work with crop varieties. In: R. Chambers, A. Pacey and L.A. Thrupp (Eds.), Farmer First. Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research, pp. 115–132. IT Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atlin, G.N., M. Cooper, Å. Bjørnstad,2001.A comparison of formal and participatory breeding approaches using selection theory.Euphytica122: 463–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atlin, G., 1997.In what situations will participatory breeding work best? Paper presented to the CPRO-DLO/IPGRI International Workshop 'Towards a synthesis between crop conservation and development', June 30-July 2, 1997, Baarlo,The Netherlands.

  • Bänziger, M. & M. Cooper, 2001.Breeding for low-input conditions and consequences for participatory plant breeding - examples from tropical maize and wheat.Euphytica122: 503–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bänziger, M., F.J. Betrán & H.R. Lafitte,1997.Efficiency of highnitrogen selection environments for improving maize for lownitrogen target environments.Crop Sci37:1103–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellon, M., 1996.The dynamics of crop infra specific diversity: a conceptual framework at the farmers' level.Econ Bot50:26–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellon, M.R. & S.B. Brush, 1994.Keepers of maize in Chiapas, Mexico.Econ Bot 8: 196–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, T., 1996.Community Seed Bank Project in Tigray, Ethiopia. Report from a review mission October-November 1995. Ås, Norway: NORAGRIC, Centre for International Environment and Development Studies. Mimeo, 24 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byerlee, D., 1996. Modern varieties productivity and sustainability. World Devel24:697–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boef, W. de, K. Amanor, K. Wellard & A. Bebbington, 1993.Cultivating Knowledge.Genetic Diversity, Farmer Experimentation and Crop research, 206 pp. Intermediate Technology Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, J., L.K. Fussell, L. Hermann, 1993. Soil and crop growth micro-variability in the West African semi-arid tropics: a possible risk-reducing factor for subsistance farmers.Agric Eco and Env45: 229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brush, S.B., 1999.The issues of in situ conservation of crop genetic resources. In:S.B. Brush (Ed.), Genes in the Field. On-Farm Conservation of Crop Diversity, pp.3–26. IPGRI/IDRC/Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, S.B., 1991.A Farmer-based approach to conserving crop germplasm.Econ Bot45:153–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, S.B., M. Bellon & E. Schmidt, 1988.Agricultural development and maize diversity in Mexico.Human Ecol16: 307–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli, S., S. Grando, E. Bailey, A. Amri, M. El-Felah, F. Nassif, S. Rezgui & A. Yahyaoui,2001. Farmer participation in barley breeding in Syria, Morocco and Tunesia. Euphytica 122: 521–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli, S., S. Grando & J. Hamblin, 1992.Relationship between barley grain yield measured in low-and high-yielding environments. Euphytica 64:49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli, S.S. Grando, R. Tutwiler, J. Baja, A.M. Martini, H. Salahieh, A. Goodchild & M. Michael, 2000.A methodological study on participatory barley breeding 1. Selection phase. Euphytica111(2):91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., A. Pacey & L.A. Thrupp,1989.Farmer First. Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research.Intermediate Technology Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clawson, D.L., 1985.Harvest security and intraspecific diversity in traditional tropical agriculture.Econ Bot39:56–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtois, B., B. Bartholome, D. Chaudhary, G. McLaren, C.H. Misra, N.P. Mandal, S. Pandey, T. Paris, C. Piggin, K. Prasad, A.T. Roy, R.K. Sahu, V.N. Sahu, S. Sarkarung, S.K. Sharma, A. Singh, H.N. Singh, O.N. Singh, N.K. Singh, R.K. Singh, S. Singh, P.K. Sinha, B.V.S. Sisodia & R. Takhur, 2001.Comparing farmers' and breeders' rankings in varietal selection for lowinput environments: a case study of rainfed rice in eastern India. Euphytica122:537–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorp, M. van & T. Rulkens,1993. Farmer crop-selection criteria and genebank collections in Indonesia. In: W. de Boef, K. Amanor, K. Wellard & A. Bebbington (Eds.), Cultivating Knowledge. Genetic Diversity, Farmer Experimentation and Crop Research, pp. 119–127. Intermediate Technology Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eeuwijk, F.A. van, M. Cooper, I.H. DeLacy, S. Ceccarelli & S. Grando,2001. Some vocabulary and grammar for the analysis of multi-environment trials, as applied to the analysis of FPB and PPB trials.Euphytica122:477–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L.T., 1993.Crop evolution, adaptation and yield.Cambridge University Press, 500 pp.

  • Friis Hansen, E.,2000.Farmers' management and use of crop genetic diversity in Tanzania. In: In: C. Almekinders & W. de Boef (Eds.), Encouraging Diversity. The Conservation and Development of Plant Genetic Resources, pp. 66–71. Intermediate Technology Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goland, C., 1993. Agricultural risk management through diversity: field scattering in Cuyo Cuyo, Peru.Cult Agric45–46:8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlan, J., 1992. Crops and Man.2nd. Edn.American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, 284 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardon, J. 1995. Participatory Plant Breeding.The Outcome of a Workshop on Participatory Plant Breeding, 26–29 July 1995. Plant Genetic Resources No. 3, October 1995.IPGRI, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardon, J. & Boef, W. de, 1993.Linking farmers and plant breeders in local crop development. In: W. de Boef, K. Amanor, K. Wellard & A. Bebbington (Eds.), Cultivating Knowledge. Genetic Diversity, Farmer Experimentation and Crop Research, pp. 64–71.Intermediate Technology Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisey, P.W., M.A. Lantican & H.J. Dubin,1999.Assessing the benefit of international wheat breeding research: an overview of the global wheat impact study. In:P.L. Pingali (Ed.), CIMMYT 1998–99 World Wheat Facts and Trends. Global research in a changing world: challenges and achievements.Mexico, D.F., CIMMYT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, D. & T. Hodgkin,1999.Wild relatives and crop cultivars: detecting natural introgression and farmer selection of new genetic combinations in agroecosystems.Molec Ecol8:159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiggins, J. & H. de Zeeuw,1992.Participatory Technology Development in practice: process and methods. In: C. Reijntjes, B. Haverkort & A. Waters-Bayer (Eds.), Farming for the Future. An Introduction to Low-External-Input and Sustainable Agriculture, pp.135–162. MacMillan/ILEA.

  • Joshi, K.D., B.R. Sthapit & J.R. Witcombe,2001.How narrowly adapted are the products of decentralised breeding? The spread of rice varieties from a participatory breeding programme in Nepal. Euphytica122:589–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, J. & S. Kolavalli,1999.Impact of Agricultural Research in Poverty Alleviation: Conceptual Framework with Illustrations from Literature.EPTD Discussion Paper,IFPRI, Washington, 195 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornegay, J., J. Alonso Betran & J. Ashby,1996. Farmer selections within segregating populations of common bean in Colombia. In: P. Eyzaguirre & M. Iwanaga (Eds.), Participatory Plant Breeding, pp. 151–159. Proc Workshop on Participatory Plant Breeding, 26–29 July 1995. Wageningen,The Netherlands.

  • Lenné, J.M. & J.B. Smithson,1994. Varietal mixtures: a viable strategy for sustainable productivity in subsistance agriculture. Asp Appl Biol39:161–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C.Y., 1978.Index selection for genetic improvement of quantitative characters.Theor Appl Genet52:49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, M. & R. Longhurst,1989. New Seeds and Poor People. Unwin Hyman, London, 473 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louette, D. & M. Smale,2000.Farmers' seed selection practices and traditional maize varieties in Cuzalapa, Mexico.Euphytica 113:25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louwaars, N.,2000.Seed regulations and local seed systems. Biotech Devel Mon42:12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, S. (in prep). Farmers' management of sorghum genetic resources in Ethiopia: A basis for participatory plant breeding? In: D. Cleveland & D. Soleri (Eds.), Collaborative Plant Breeding: Integrating Farmers' and Plant Breeders' Knowledge and Practice.Wallingford, CABI.

  • McGuire, S.,2000. Farmers' management of sorghum diversity in eastern Ethiopia. In:C. Almekinders & W. de Boef (Eds.), Encouraging Diversity. The Conservation and Development of Plant Genetic Resources, pp. 43–48. Intermediate Technology Publications, London.

  • Merrick, L., 1989.Crop genetic diversity and its conservation in traditional agro-ecosystems In:M.A. Altieri & S.B. Hecht (Eds.), Agroecology and Small Farm Development, pp.3–11.CRC Press, Boca Raton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noordwijk, M. van, G.H. Dijksterhuis & H. van Keulen,1994.Risk management in crop production and fertiliser use with uncertain rainfall; how many eggs in which baskets.Neth J Agric Sci42: 249–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prain, G., J. Schneider & C. Widiyastuti, 2000.Farmers' maintenance of sweet potato diversity in Irian Jaya. In: C. Almekinders & W. de Boef (Eds.), Encouraging Diversity. The Conservation and Development of Plant Genetic Resources, pp. 54–59. Intermediate Technology Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, E., M. Smale & J.L. Blanco, 1998.Farmers' use of improved seed selection practices in Mexican maize: evidence and issues from the Sierra de Santa Marta.World Devel26(9):1625–1640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosas, J.C., J.J. Alán, E. Flores & M. Smith,1998.Mejoramiento y conservación de maíces criollos con pequeños agricultores en Honduras. In: H. Cárdenas y C. Almekinders (Eds.),Memoria de Seminario Fitomejoramiento participativo: experiencias y opportunidades en Mesoamérica, 16–17 de Marzo, La Heredia, Costa Rica, IDEAS/CPRO-CGN. pp.13–16.

  • Smale, M. & M. R. Bellon, 1999. A conceptual framework for valuing on-farm genetic resources. In: D. Wood & J.M. Lenné (Eds.), Agrobiodiversity. Characterization, Utilization and Management, pp. 387–408. Wallingford, CABI Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.E., Castillo G., F., Gómez, F., 2001.Participatory plant breeding with maize in Mexico and Honduras. Euphytica122: 551–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soleri, D., S.E. Smith & D.A. Cleveland, 2000.Evaluating the potential for farmer and breeder collaboration: a case study of farmer maize selection in Oaxaca, Mexico. Euphytica 116(1): 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, L., J.A. Ashby, M.E. Smith, E. Weltzien & S. McGuire, 2001. A framework for analyzing participatory plant breeding approaches and results.Euphytica122: 439–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, L. & J.A. Ashby,1997.Participatory Plant Breeding: emerging models and future development. In: R. Tripp (Ed.), New Seeds and old Laws, pp 198–213. Regulatory reform and the diversification of national seed systems.IT Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, L., M. Loevinsohn & B. Ntabomvura,1993.Rethinking farmers' role in plant breeding: local bean experts and on-station selection in Rwanda.Exp Agric29:509–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, L., U. Scheidegger & R. Buruchara, 1996.Designing Seed Systems with Small Farmers: Principles Derived from Bean Research in the Great Lakes Region of Africa, Agricultural Research and Extension Network Paper 60. Overseas Development Agency, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sthapit, B.R., K.D. Joshi & J.R. Witcombe, 1996.Farmer participatory crop improvement. III. Farmer participatory plant breeding in Nepal.Exp Agric 32:479–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurston, H.D., J. Salick, M.E. Smith, P. Trutmann, J.L.-Pham & R. McDowell, 1999.Traditional management of agrobiodiversity. In: In: D. Wood & J.M. Lenné (Eds.), Agrobiodiversity. Characterization, Utilization and Management, pp.211–243. Wallingford, CABI Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiele, G., G. Gardner, R. Torrez & J. Gabriel,1997.Farmer involvement in selection of new varieties: potatoes in Bolivia.Exp Agric33:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tin, H.Q., T. Berg & Bjørnstad, 2001.Diversity and adaptation in rice varieties under static (ex situ) and dynamic (in situ) management. A case study in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam.Euphytica 122: 491–502.

  • Toledo Machado, A. & Silvestre Fernandes, M.,2001. Participatory maize breeding for low nitrogen tolerance. Euphytica 122:567–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenbath, B., 1974.Biomass productivity of mixtures.Adv in Agron 26:177–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripp, R., 1997.The structure of the National Seed Systems. In: R. Tripp (Ed.), New Seeds and Old Laws. Regulatory Reform and the Diversification of National Seed Systems, pp. 14–42.IT Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weltzien, E., 2000. Supporting farmers' genetic resource management: experiences with pearl millet in India. In:C. Almekinders & W. de Boef (Eds.), Encouraging Diversity. The Conservation and Development of Plant Genetic Resources, pp. 189–193. Intermediate Technology Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weltzien, E., M.L. Whitaker & M. Dhamotharan, 1996.Diagnostic methods for pearl millet with farmers in Rajasthan. In: L. Sperling & M. Loevinsohn (Eds.), Using Diversity. Enhancing and Maintaining Genetic Resources On-Farm, pp.127–139.Proc of a Workshop held on 19–21 June 1995, New Delhi, India.

  • Wierema, H., C. Almekinders, L. Keune & R. Vermeer,1993. La producción campesina en Centroamérica: los sistemas locales de semilla. IVO, P.O. Box 90153, Tilburg, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witcombe, J.R., K.D. Joshi, R.B. Rana & D.S. Virk,2001.Broadening genetic diversity in high potential production systems by participatory varietal selection.Euphytica122:575–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witcombe, J.R. & D.S. Virk, 2001.Number of crosses and population size for participatory and classical plant breeding.Euphytica 122:451–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witcombe, J.R., and D.S. Virk,1997.New directions for public sector variety testing. In: R. Tripp,New Seeds and Old Laws. Regulatory Reform and the Diversification of National Seed Systems, pp. 59–87. IT Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witcombe, J.R., A. Joshi, K.D. Joshi & B.R. Sthapit, 1996.Farmer participatory crop improvement. I. Varietal Selection and Plant Breeding methods and their impact on biodiversity.Exp Agric 32:445–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, M., 1992.Barley diseases: maintaining the value of our varieties.Barely GenetVI:1055–1067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worede, Melaku, Tesfaye Tesemma & Regassa Feyissa, 1999. Keeping diversity alive: an Ethiopian perspective. In: S.B. Brush (Ed.), Genes in the Field. On-Farm Conservation of Crop Diversity, pp.143–161. IPGRI/IDRC/Lewi Publishers, Boca Raton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, B. & J. Engels,2000.Synthesis: the common goal of conservation of genetic resources. In:C. Almekinders & W. de Boef (Eds.), Encouraging Diversity. The Conservation and Development of Plant Genetic Resources, pp.145–153.Intermediate Technology Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, B. & D. Jarvis,2000. Upscaling approaches to supprt onfarm conservation. In: C. Almekinders & W. de Boef (Eds.), Encouraging Diversity. The Conservation and Development of Plant Genetic Resources, pp. 141–145.Intermediate Technology Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technology and Agrarian Development, Wageningen University, Leeuwenborch, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    C.J.M. Almekinders

  2. Plant Research International, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    A. Elings

Authors
  1. C.J.M. Almekinders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Elings
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Almekinders, C., Elings, A. Collaboration of farmers and breeders: Participatory crop improvement in perspective. Euphytica 122, 425–438 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017968717875

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017968717875

Search

Navigation