Skip to main content

Decentralized Collaborative Plant Breeding for Utilization and Conservation of Neglected and Underutilized Crop Genetic Resources

  • Chapter
Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Breeding, Biotechnology and Molecular Tools

Abstract

Neglected and underutilized species (NUS) are referred to as species with under-exploited potentials with regard to food and nutrition security, health, income generation and environmental services. In the past, most breeding activities have concentrated on major crops, leading to overdependence on a few plant species of worldwide economic importance. The reasons for NUS being underutilized are complex and entail economic and agro-ecological constraints as well as lack of knowledge, awareness and supportive policies. Contextualization, decentralization and collaboration are proposed as important design principles for breeding strategies focusing on NUS. Four case studies illustrate how they are practically implemented in breeding programs. Two case studies focus on improving NUS for adaptation to climate variability and change: participatory breeding programs for sorghum and pearl millet in West Africa and Andean potatoes in Peru are taken as examples. Further case studies concentrate on improving agronomic and nutritional properties of local quinoa and amaranth varieties in Peru, and sensory quality of a less common vegetable crop in Germany. We discuss breeding strategies for NUS based on their objectives, the genetic resources used, breeding processes and techniques, as well as links to value chain development and seed systems. We conclude that breeding strategies for NUS should increasingly be embedded in multi-stakeholder strategies for collaborative learning and to expand the focus of interest from enhancing varieties towards building innovative institutions and partnerships that help develop sustainable food and farming systems and are linked to human needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Annichiarico P (2009) Coping with and exploiting genotype-by-environment interactions. In: Ceccarelli S, Guimarães EP, Weltzien E (eds) Plant breeding and farmer participation. FAO, Rome, pp 519–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby JA, Lilja N (2004) Participatory research: does it work? Evidence from participatory plant breeding. In: New directions for a diverse planet. Proceedings of the 4th international crop science congress, Brisbane, Australia, 26 Sept–1 Oct 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Badstue LB, Hellin J, Berthaud J (2012) Re-orienting participatory plant breeding for wider impact. Afr J Agr Res 7(4):523–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Barahona C, Levy S (2002) How to generate statistics and influence policy using participatory methods in research. Statistical Services Centre working paper. University of Reading, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer D, Kern M, Horneburg B, Fleck M (2006) Erstellung, Erweiterung und qualitative Verbesserung des Pastinakensortiments für den Ökologischen Anbau unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Geschmacks; Weiterentwicklung der entsprechenden Zuchtmethoden. Final report. http://orgprints.org/15268/1/15268-03OE481-kultursaat-fleck-2006-pastinake.pdf

  • Bellon MR, Reeves J (eds) (2002) Quantitative analysis of data from participatory methods in plant breeding. CIMMYT, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley JW, van Mele P, Reece JD (2011) How seed works. In: van Mele P, Bentley JF, Guéi RG (eds) African seed enterprises. Sowing the seeds of food security. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 8–24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bingenheimer Saatgut AG (2014) Online catalogue. http://www.bingenheimersaatgut.de/de/Gemuese/Wurzel-Knollengemuese/Pastinaken

  • Burlingame B, Dernini S (eds) (2012) Sustainable diets and biodiversity, directions and solutions for policy, research and action. In: Proceedings of the international scientific symposium biodiversity and sustainable diets united against hunger, FAO Headquarters, Rome. 3–5 Nov 2010. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli S (2009) Evolution, plant breeding and biodiversity. J Agr Envir Int Dev 103(1/2):131–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli S (2012) Plant breeding with farmers – a technical manual. ICARDA, Aleppo

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli S (2014) Drought. In: Jackson M, Ford-Lloyd B, Parry M (eds) Plant genetic resources and climate change. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 221–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli S, Grando S, Booth RH (1996) International breeding programmes and resource-poor farmers: crop improvement in difficult environments. In: Eyzaguirre P, Iwanaga M (eds) Participatory plant breeding. Proceedings of a workshop on participatory plant breeding, Wageningen, 26–29 Jul 1995. IPGRI, Rome, pp 99–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli S, Grando S, Tutwiler J et al (2000) A methodological study on participatory barely breeding. 1. Selection phase. Euphytica 111:91–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli S, Galie A, Grando S (2013a) Participatory breeding for climate change-related traits. In: Cole (ed) Genomics and breeding for climate-resilient crops, Vol. 1. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 331–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli S, Grando S, Winge T (2013b) Participatory barley breeding in Syria. In: Andersen R, Winge T (eds) Realising farmers’ rights to crop genetic resources: success stories and best practices. Routledge, London/New York, pp 97–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman SC, Hammer GL, Podlich DW, Cooper M (2002) Linking bio-physical and genetic models to integrate physiology, molecular biology and plant breeding. In: Kang MS (ed) Quantitative genetics, genomics and plant breeding. CABI, Wallingford, pp 167–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman S, Cooper M, Podlich D, Hammer G (2003) Evaluating plant breeding strategies by simulating gene action and dryland environment effects. Agron J 95:99–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary P, Sthapit B (2013) Agricultural biodiversity conservation and food security for small farmers. In: Christinck A, Padmanabhan M (eds) Cultivate diversity, A handbook on transdisciplinary approaches to agrobiodiversity research. Margraf Publishers, Weikersheim, pp 53–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary SS, Swain S (2013) Value chain development and the regional branding of Kalajeera rice in Jeypore, India. In: De Boef WS, Subedi A, Peroni N et al (eds) Community biodiversity management. Promoting resilience and the conservation of plant genetic resources, Issues in agricultural biodiversity series. Routledge, London, pp 201–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Christinck A, Weltzien E, Hoffmann V (eds) (2005) Setting breeding objectives and developing seed systems with farmers, A handbook for practical use in participatory plant breeding projects. Margraf Publishers, Weikersheim

    Google Scholar 

  • CIP-UPWARD (2003) Conservation and sustainable use of agricultural biodiversity: a sourcebook. Three volumes. International Potato Center (CIP)/Users Perspectives With Agricultural Research and Development (UPWARD), Los Baños

    Google Scholar 

  • Conroy C, Witcombe JR, Virk DS et al (2009) New upland rice varieties for India. Rainfed Agriculture Impact Study No. 1. Monitoring impact assessment and learning component (MIL) 2.2 of the Research Into Use Programme (RIU). DFID, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper M, Stucker RE, De Lacy IH, Harch BD (1996) Wheat breeding nurseries, target environments, and indirect selection for grain yield. Crop Sci 37:1168–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson IK, Jaenicke H (2006) Underutilised plant species: the role of biotechnology. Position Paper No. 1. International Centre for Underutilised Crops (ICUC), Colombo

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson JC, Murphy KM, Jones SS (2008) Decentralized selection and participatory approaches in plant breeding for low-input systems. Euphytica 160:143–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boef WS, Subedi A, Peroni N et al (eds) (2013) Community biodiversity management. Promoting resilience and the conservation of plant genetic resources, Issues in agricultural biodiversity series. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • De Haan S, Bastos C (2012) Catálogo de nuevas variedades de papa: sabores y colores para el gusto peruano. Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agraria (INIA), Red LatinPapa, Lima, Peru

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Haan S, Juarez H (2010) Land use and potato genetic resources in Huancavelica, central Peru. J Land Use Sci 5(3):179–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Schutter O (2009) Seed policies and the right to food: enhancing agrobiodiversity and encouraging innovation. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food to the General Assembly of the United Nations, 23 Jul 2009. UNO, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Development Fund (2012) Community-based biodiversity management – South Asia Programme (CBM-SA), evaluation report. Norwegian Development Fund, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Diakité L, Sidibé A, Smale M, Grum M (2008) Seed value chains for sorghum and millet in Mali, a state-based system in transition. IFPRI discussion paper 00749. IFPRI, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Döring T, Knapp S, Kovacs G et al (2011) Evolutionary plant breeding in cereals – into a new era. Sustainability 3(10):1944–1971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanzo J, Mattei F (2012) Ensuring agriculture, biodiversity and nutrition remains central to addressing the MDG hunger target. In: Burlingame B, Dernini S (eds) Sustainable diets and biodiversity. FAO, Rome, pp 44–53

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1992) Forests, trees and food. Forestry Department, FAO, Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/006/u5620e/U5620E03.htm

  • FAO (1997) The state of the world’s plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. FAO, Rome. http://apps3.fao.org/wiews/docs/swrfull.pdf

  • FAO (2008) New light on a hidden treasure: an end-of-year review. International year of the potato 2008. FAO, Rome. http://www.fao.org/potato-2008/pdf/IYPbook-en.pdf

  • Fleck M (2013) Kultursaat – frei finanzierte gärtnerische Züchtung. Ein Konzept wird 20 Jahre alt. Lebendige Erde 2013(4):12–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca C, De Haan S, Miethbauer T et al (2011) Selección participativa de variedades de papa en Peru. In: Thiele G, Quirós CA, Ashby J et al (eds) Métodos participativos para la inclusión de los pequeños productores rurales en la innovación agropecuaria. Alianza Cambio Andino, Lima, Peru, pp 169–184 http://cipotato.org/publications/pdf/005888.pdf

  • Galluzzi G, Estrada R, Apaza V et al (2014) Participatory breeding in the Peruvian highlands: opportunities and challenges for promoting conservation and sustainable use of underutilized crops. Renew Agr Food Syst [online]. doi:10.1017/S1742170514000179

  • Gari JA (2004) Plant diversity, sustainable rural livelihoods and the HIV/Aids crisis. FAO/UNDP, Rome/Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • Giraldo D, Juarez H, Pérez W et al (2010) Severity of the potato late blight (Phytophthora infestans) in agricultural areas of Peru associated with climate change. Rev Peruana Geo-Atmos (RPGA) 2:56–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Haussmann BIG, Hess DE, Omanya GO et al (2004) Genomic regions influencing resistance to the parasitic weed Striga hermonthica in two recombinant inbred populations of sorghum. Theor Appl Genet 109(5):1005–1016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haussmann BIG, Rattunde HF, Weltzien-Rattunde E et al (2012) Breeding strategies for adaptation of pearl millet and sorghum to climate variability and change. J Agr Crop Sci 198(5):327–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes JG (1979) Genetic poverty of the potato in Europe. In: Zeven AC, van Harten AM (eds) Proceedings of the conference on broadening the genetic base of crops, Wageningen, 3–7 Jul 1978. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, pp 19–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann V, Probst K, Christinck A (2007) Farmers and researchers: how can collaborative advantages be created in participatory research and technology development? Agr Human Val 24:355–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horneburg B, Bauer D, Bufler G (2009) Züchterische Verbesserung der sensorischen Qualität der Pastinake (Pastinaca sativa L.) im Praxisbetrieb. E-proceedings of the 10th scientific conference on organic farming, Zurich, Switzerland, 11–13 Feb 2009. http://orgprints.org/14145/1/Horneburg_14145.pdf

  • Humphries S, Gallardo O, Jimenez J, Sierra F (2005) Linking small farmers to the formal research sector. Lessons from a participatory bean breeding program in Honduras. AgREN network paper 142. DFID, London

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA (2004) Genetic improvement of neglected and under-utilized crops in low income food deficit countries through irradiation and related techniques. In: Proceedings of a final research coordination meeting organized by the joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture and held in Pretoria, South Africa, 19–23 May 2003 (IAEA-TECDOC-1426). IAEA, Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaenicke H, Hoeschle-Zeledon I (eds) (2006) Strategic framework for underutilized plant species research and development, with special reference to Asia and the Pacific, and to Sub-Saharan Africa. ICUC/GFU, Bogor/Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaenicke H, Pasiecznik N (2009) Making the most of underutilized crops. LEISA Mag 25(1):11–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäger M, Amaya K, Oros R et al (in prep.) Linking genebanks and small farmers to high-value markets through collective action: the case of chili peppers in Bolivia and Peru. Submitted for publication to J Dev Stud

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaboré R, Dabat MH, Brocke K (2010) Coordination et durabilité des nouvelles formes de production semencière vivrière au Burkina Faso. In: Seiny-Boukar L, Boumar P (eds) Actes du colloque Savanes africaines en développement: innover pour durer. Garoua, Cameroun, 20–23 April 2009. CIRAD, Montpellier

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahane R, Hodgkin T, Jaenicke H et al (2013) Agrobiodiversity for food security, health and income. Agron Sust Dev 33(4):671–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann B, Arpke H, Christinck A (2013) From assessing knowledge to joint learning. In: Christinck A, Padmanabhan M (eds) Cultivate diversity! A handbook on transdisciplinary approaches to agrobiodiversity research. Margraf Publishers, Weikersheim, pp 115–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Keding G, Schneider K, Jordan I (2013) Production and processing of foods as core aspects of nutrition-sensitive agriculture and sustainable diets. Food Sec 5(6):825–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoury CK, Bjorkman AD, Dempewolf H et al (2014) Increasing homogeneity in global food supplies and implications for food security. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 111(11):4001–4006

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kroschel J, Sporleder M, Tonnang HEZ et al (2013) Predicting climate-change-caused changes in global temperature on potato tuber moth p (Zeller) distribution and abundance using phenology modeling and GIS mapping. Agr For Meteor 170:228–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruijssen F, Giuliani A, Sudha M (2009) Marketing underutilized crops to sustain agrobiodiversity and improve livelihoods. Acta Hort 806(2):415–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnlein HV (2012) Biodiversity and sustainability of indigenous peoples’ foods and diets. In: Burlingame B, Dernini S (eds) Sustainable diets and biodiversity. Directions and solutions for policy, research and action. Proceedings of the international scientific symposium biodiversity and sustainable diets united against hunger, FAO Headquarters, Rome, 3–5 Nov 2010. FAO, Rome, pp 118–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Kultursaat (2014) www.kultursaat.org

  • Leiser WL, Rattunde HFW, Piepho HP et al (2012) Selection strategy for sorghum targeting phosphorus-limited environments in West Africa: analysis of multi-environment experiments. Crop Sci 52(6):2517–2527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MSSRF (2005) UN millennium development goals – five years later. Agricultural biodiversity and the elimination of hunger and poverty: the Chennai platform for action. MSSRF, Chennai, India. http://www.mssrf.org/bd/ebooks/ebook7.pdf

  • Murphy K, Lammer D, Lyon S et al (2005) Breeding for organic and low-input farming systems: an evolutionary-participatory breeding method for inbred cereal grains. Renew Agr Food Syst 20:48–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustafa Y, Grando S, Ceccarelli S (2006) Assessing the benefits and costs of participatory and conventional barley breeding programs in Syria. ICARDA, Aleppo

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochatt S, Jain SM (2007) Breeding of neglected and under-utilized crops, spices and herbs. Science Publishers, Enfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Oscanoa C, Vilchez J, Narro T, Sevilla R (2004) Participatory breeding and decentralized seed production in maize in the Central Highlands of Peru. CIMMYT, El Batán

    Google Scholar 

  • Padulosi S, Dulloo EM (2012) Towards a viable system for monitoring agrobiodiversity on-farm: a proposed new approach for Red Listing of cultivated species. In: Padulosi S, Bergamini N, Lawrence T (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on-farm conservation of neglected and underutilized species: status, trends and novel approaches to cope with climate change, Frankfurt, 14–16 June 2011. Bioversity International, Rome, pp 171–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Padulosi S, Thompson J, Rudebjer P (2013) Fighting poverty, hunger and malnutrition with neglected and underutilized species (NUS): needs, challenges and the way forward. Bioversity International, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Padulosi S, Amaya K, Jäger M et al (2014) A holistic approach to enhance the use of neglected and underutilized species: the case of Andean grains in Bolivia and Peru. Sustainability 6(3):1283–1312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor S, Fuentealba B, Ruiz M (2008) Cultivos subutilizados en el Perú. Análisis de las políticas públicas relativas a su conservación y uso sostenible. Sociedad Peruana de Derecho Ambiental (SPDA), Lima

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez C, Nicklin C, Dangles O et al (2010) Climate change in the high Andes: implications and adaptation strategies for small scale farmers. Int J Env Cult Econ Soc Sustain 6:71–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Rattunde HFW, Weltzien E, Diallo B et al (2013) Yield of photoperiod-sensitive sorghum hybrids based on guinea-race germplasm under farmers’ field conditions in Mali. Crop Sci 53:2454–2461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sevilla R (2008) Mejoramiento poblacional del maíz en la Sierra. In: Proceedings of the international symposium investigación hacia un desarrollo sostenible, La Molina University, Lima, 16–17 Sept 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Siart S (2008) Strengthening local seed systems: options for enhancing diffusion of varietal diversity of sorghum in southern Mali. Margraf Publishers, Weikersheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds NW (1984) Decentralized selection. Sugar Cane 6:8–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Snapp S (2002) Quantifying farmer evaluation of technologies: the mother and baby trial design. In: Bellon MR, Reeves J (eds) Quantitative analysis of data from participatory methods in plant breeding. CIMMYT, Mexico, pp 8–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Sthapit BR, Shrestha P, Upadhyay MP (eds) (2006) On-farm management of agricultural biodiversity in Nepal: good practices. NARC, LI-BIRD and Bioversity International, Pokhara

    Google Scholar 

  • Suneson CA (1956) An evolutionary plant breeding method. Agron J 48:188–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiele G (1999) Informal seed systems in the Andes: why are they important and what should we do with them? World Dev 27(1):83–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thies E (2000) Promising and underutilized species, crops and breeds. GTZ, Eschborn

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumwegamire S (2011) Genetic variation, diversity and genotype by environment interactions of nutritional quality traits in East African sweet potato. PhD thesis, Makerere University, Kampala

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (2014) Nutrient content of parsnip, raw. National nutrient database for standard reference, Release 26. United States Department of Agriculture. http://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/foods/show/3093

  • vom Brocke K, Trouche G, Hocdé H, Bonzi N (2011) Sélection variétal au Burkina Faso: un nouveau partenariat entre chercheurs et agriculteurs. Grain de Sel 52-53:20–21

    Google Scholar 

  • vom Brocke K, Zougmoré R, Barro C et al (2012) Using indigenous knowledge and participatory plant breeding to improve crop production and regenerate crops and tree species in West Africa. In: Padulosi S, Bergamini N, Lawrence T (eds) On-farm conservation of neglected and underutilized species: status, trends and novel approaches to cope with climate change. Proceedings of an international conference, Frankfurt, 14–16 Jun 2011. Bioversity International, Rome, pp 116–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang F (2011) Genetic diversity of the selected 64 potato germplasm revealed by AFLP markers. Mol Plant Breed 2:22–29

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weltzien E, Smith ME, Meitzner LS, Sperling L (2003) Technical and institutional issues in participatory plant breeding – from the perspective of formal plant breeding: a global analysis of issues, results, and current experience. CIAT, Cali

    Google Scholar 

  • Weltzien E, vom Brocke K, Rattunde F (2005) Planning plant breeding activities with farmers. In: Christinck A, Weltzien E, Hoffmann V (eds) Setting breeding objectives and developing seed systems with farmers, A handbook for practical use in participatory plant breeding projects. Margraf Publishers/CTA, Weikersheim/Wageningen, pp 123–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Weltzien E, Christinck A, Touré A et al (2006) Enhancing farmers’ access to sorghum varieties through scaling-up participatory plant breeding in Mali, West Africa. In: Almekinders C, Hardon J (eds) Bringing farmers back into breeding. Experiences with participatory plant breeding and challenges for institutionalisation, vol 5, Agromisa special. Agromisa, Wageningen, pp 61–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner M, Diarra L, Hülsebusch C, Kaufmann B (2010) Securing food supply by adapting millet growing to climate variability: decision-making rules of Fulani agro-pastoralists in the Mopti region, Mali. In: Proceedings of Deutscher Tropentag World Food System – a contribution from Europe. Zurich, 14–16 Sept 2010. ETH/DITSL, Zurich/Witzenhausen. http://www.tropentag.de/2010/abstracts/links/Werner_jmrIOtsF.php

  • Will M (2006) Promoting value chains of neglected and underutilized species for pro-poor growth and biodiversity. Guidelines and good practices. GFU, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Yiching S, Vernooy R (eds) (1999) Seeds and synergies: innovating rural development in China. Practical Action Publishing, Bourton on Dunsmore, UK and the International Development Research Centre (IDRC), Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude for Dr Salvatore Ceccarelli’s helpful comments on the manuscript. We further thank Dr Eva Weltzien (ICRISAT), as well as Dietrich Bauer and Michael Fleck (Kultursaat e.V.), for their willingness to share information and for clarifying questions regarding the case study examples. Last but not least, Thor Lawrence’s careful editing work is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Camacho-Henriquez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Camacho-Henriquez, A., Kraemer, F., Galluzzi, G., de Haan, S., Jäger, M., Christinck, A. (2015). Decentralized Collaborative Plant Breeding for Utilization and Conservation of Neglected and Underutilized Crop Genetic Resources. In: Al-Khayri, J., Jain, S., Johnson, D. (eds) Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Breeding, Biotechnology and Molecular Tools. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22521-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics