Skip to main content
Log in

The negative response of the flash electroretinogram in glaucoma

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The existence of a negative ERG component following the b-wave has been known for a long time. Recently, in unilateral macaque experimental glaucoma, a negative response in flash electroretinograms under scotopic as well as photopic conditions has been shown to be greatly reduced or absent compared to the healthy fellow eye. The aim of this pilot study was to test whether a late negative electroretinogram component is reduced also in human glaucoma patients under different stimulus conditions. Dark-adapted ganzfeld flash electroretinograms were recorded after 30 min of dark using two test conditions, obtained as optimal in pilot studies on controls. Under the scotopic condition I white Xenon-flashes of intensity 0.53 Log photopic Td s were presented on a low white background of 1.38 Log scotopic Td. Under the more photopic condition II orange flashes of intensity −0.37 Log photopic Td s were presented on a blue-adapting background of 2.5 Log scotopic Td. Nine controls and 18 patients with advanced glaucoma were analyzed. The amplitude of the negative response was not significantly reduced in glaucoma patients (condition I: −28.5±23.7 μV; condition II: −25.2±19.7 μV) compared to controls (condition I: −41.4±36.6 μV; condition II: −31.3±26.2 μV). The peak latency of the responses under condition I and II did not differ significantly between patients and controls. Thus, the late negative electroretinogram component in ganzfeld flash electroretinograms obtained under scotopic and more photopic conditions does not seem to distinguish as easy between human controls and glaucoma patients as animal experiments suggest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leyhecker G. The electroretinogram in glaucomatous eyes.Br J Ophthalmol1950;34: 550-4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Francois J. L'electroretinographie dans le glaucoma.Acta Ophthalmol 1953; 31:205-18.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schmöger B, Zimmer W. Das Elektroretinogramm bei primärem Glaukom.Klin Mbl Augenheilk1965; 146: 122-3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alvis DL. Electroretinographic changes in controlled chronic open-angle glaucoma.Am J Ophthalmol1966;61:121-31.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bartl G. Das Elektroretinogramm und das evozierte Sehrindenpotential bei normalen und bei Glaukom erkrankten Augen.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol1978; 207:243-69.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fazio DT, Heckenlively JR, Martin DA, Christensen RE. The electroretinogram in advanced open-angle glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol1986; 63: 45-54.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lowitzsch K, Welt R. VEP und Elektroretinographie durch Musterumkehrreizung in der Frühdiagnose des glaucoma chronicum simplex.Z EEG EMG1991; 22: 217-23.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vass C, Menapace R, Gottlob I. Veränderungen des Helligkeits-Elektroretinogramms bei Patienten mit glaucoma chronicum simplex.Spektr Augenheilkd 1990; 4/6: 226-9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gur M, Zeevi Y, Bielik M, Neumann E.Changes in the oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram in glaucoma. Cur Eye Res 1987;6: 457-66.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vaegan, Graham SL, Goldberg I, Millar TJ. Selective reduction of oscillatory potentials and pattern electroretinograms after retinal ganglion cell damage by disease in humans or by kainic acid toxicity in cats.Doc Ophthalmol1991;77: 237-53.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sieving PA, Frishman LJ, Steinberg RH. Scotopic threshold response of proximal retina in cat. J Neurophysiol 1986;56:1049-61.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wakabayashi K, Gieser J, Sieving PA. Aspartate separation of the scotopic threshold response (STR) from the photoreceptor a-wave of the cat and monkey ERG.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1988;29:1615-22.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sieving PA, Wakabayashi K.Comparison of rod threshold ERG from monkey, cat and human.Clin Vis Sci1991; 6:171-9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Frishman LJ, Shen FF, Du L, Robson JG, Harwerth RS, Smith III EL, Carter-Dawson L, Crawford LMJ. The scotopic electroretinogram of macaque after retinal ganglion cell loss from experimental glaucoma.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1996; 37: 125-41.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Korth M, Nguyen NX, Horn F, Martus P. Scotopic threshold response and scotopic PII in glaucoma.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1994;35:619-25.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG, Harwerth RS, Smith III EL. The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram: reduction by experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci1999; 40:1124-36.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schweitzer NMJ, Troelstra A. A negative component in the b-wave of the human ERG. Ophthalmologica 1965; 149:230-5.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Troelstra A, Schweitzer NMJ. Nonlinear analysis of electroretinographic b-wave in man. J Neurophysiol1968; 31:588-606.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marmor M, Arden GB, Nilsson SR, Zrenner E. Standard for clinical electroretinography. Arch Ophthalmol1989; 107:816-9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Aguilar M, Stiles WS.Saturation of the rod mechanism of the retina at high levels of stimulation.Optica Acta1954;1: 59-65.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Troelstra A, Schweitzer NMJ. An analysis of the b-wave in the human ERG.Vision Res 1963;3: 213-26.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Troelstra A, Schweitzer NMJ. On the relationship between the single flash ERG and the ERG elicited by more complex stimuli.Doc Ophthalmol 1964;18:114-27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cursiefen, C., Korth, M. & Horn, F.K. The negative response of the flash electroretinogram in glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol 103, 1–12 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017539018387

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017539018387

Navigation