Skip to main content
Log in

Hemodialysis vascular assessment by an ultrasound dilution method (transonic) in patients older than 65 years

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Malfunction of vascular access is one of the most frequent causes of morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis patients (HD). Early diagnosis makes possible the most frequent vascular access (VA) used in HD patients. The arteriovenous fistula (AVF), both autologous or heterologous, is the appropriate correction by an interventional radiologist or by surgery, before thrombosis appears. For this purpose, a follow-up of VA is mandatory. New technologies offer non-invasive methods for this purpose. In HD sessions ultrasound ‘on line’ and ultrasound-dilution techniques permit us to monitor vascular access in HD patients. Also transonic technology has been validated for this purpose, although the limitations of its use among elderly patients is unknown. Using the Transonic HD 01 monitor, we studied vascular access in 45 patients in HD older than 65 years, and compared them with 47 patients who were younger than 65 years. The parameters analyzed were: effective flow Qt, recirculation, venous pressure and access flow. We found no significant differences between these parameters but in both groups found that the effective flow measure by Transonic was lower than that measured by a blood pump. Both groups contained patients who had no recirculation but had an access flow that was lower than expected. To rule out stenosis of VA in those patients, we performed an Eco Doppler confirming that all patients had stenosis. With this method, one can determines the access flow and thus predicts the possibility of future thrombosis. Conclusion: Our data confirm that one can evaluate VA in patients older than 65 years with Transonic HD01 monitor, and also in patients younger than 65 years. Due to the special characteristics of the vessels in elderly patients, Transonic HD01 monitor is a good method by which to monitor VA in them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hakim R, Himmefarlb J. Hemodialysis access failure: a call to action. Kidney Int 1998; 54: 1029–1040.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bouchouareb D, Saveanu A, Bartoli JM, Olmer M. A new approach to evaluate vascular access in hemodialysis patients. Artif Organs 1998; 22: 591–594.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Beathard GA, Settle SM, Shields MW. Salvage of the nonfunctioning arteriovenous fistula. Am J Kidney Dis 1999; 33: 910–916.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Krivinski NM. Theory and validation of access flow measurement by dilution technique during hemodialysis. Kidney Int 1995; 48: 244–250.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Krivinski NM, MacGibbon D, Gleed RD, Dobson A. Accuracy of dilution techniques for access flow measurement during hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1998; 31: 502–508.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Levin NW, Yang PM, Hatch DA, Dubrow AJ, Caraiani NS, Ing TS, Gandhi VC, Alto A, Davila SM, Prosi FR, Polaschegg HD, Megerman J. Initial results of a new access device for hemodialysis. Kidney Int 1998; 54: 1739–1745.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. N Ridao, Polo JR, Perez Garcia R, Sanchez M., Rengel MA, Gomez Campdera FJ. Nefrología 1998; 28: 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sands J, Glidden D, Jacavage W, Jones B. Difference between delivered and prescribed blood flow in hemodialysis. ASAIO J, 1996; 42(5): M 717–719.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shapiro W, Gurevich L. The effect of arterial needle size on dialyzer blood flow as measured by ultrasound dilution (UD). JASN Abstracts 1996; 7(9): 1419.

    Google Scholar 

  10. MacDonald J, Sosa M, Nudo S, Glidden D, Sands JJ. Identifying a new reality: zero access recirculation. Am Nurses Assoc J 1996; 23(2): 172.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bosman PJ, Boereboom FTJ, Eikelboom BC, Koomans HA, Blankestijn PJ. Graft flow as a predictor of thrombosis in hemodialysis grafts. Kidney Int 1998; 54: 1726–1730.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Neira NR, Ikizler TA, May RE, Himmelfarb J, Schulman G, Shyr Y, Hakim RM. Change in access blood flow over time predicts vascular access thrombosis. Kidney Int 1998; 54: 1714–1719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Blankestijn PJ, Smits JHM. How to identify the Hemodialysis access at risk of thrombosis? Are flow measurements the answer? Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999; 14: 1068–1071.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barril, G., Besada, E., Cirugeda, A. et al. Hemodialysis vascular assessment by an ultrasound dilution method (transonic) in patients older than 65 years. Int Urol Nephrol 32, 459–462 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017534317535

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017534317535

Navigation