Skip to main content
Log in

Urine cytology in patients with urinary tract calculosis

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urinary cytological examination was performed on 375 patients suffering from urolithiasis at the Department of Urology, University School of Medical Sciences, Bydgoszcz between 01.01.1991 and 31.12.1992. 189 were female(mean age: 47.5 years), 186 were male (mean age: 53.5 years). We found dysplastic cells in urinary sediments in 25.3% of patients before therapy and in 5.3% of patients after conservative or traditional operation and interventional therapy (ESWL, PCNL). Degenerated cells were found in 72%of patients before therapy and in 30.4% after therapy only. In our group neoplasmatical cells were not found. Inflammatory background was found in 44.5% before and in 21.9% after therapy, pyuria in 19.7% and 0.8%respectively. In urinary sediments we found concrements in 24% of patients before and 7.7% after therapy. However, 20 (51.3%) of 39 patients after interventional therapy (ESWL, PCNL) had concrements in urinary sediments. In conclusion, no abnormality was seen in 85.1% before therapy and in 31.2% after therapy. The significance of cytological examination in management of calculous diseases was discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Urological Association: Report of American Urological Association ad hoc committee to study the safety and clinical efficacy of current technology of percutaneous lithotripsy and non-invasive lithotrypsy. Baltimore, Maryland: American Urological Association, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beyer-Boon ME, Cnypers LHRJ, de Voogt HJ, Brussce JAM. Cytological changes due to urinary calculi: A consideration of the relationship between calculi and the development of urothelial carcinoma. Br J Urol 1978; 50: 81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Borówka A. ESWL-nowa metoda leczenia kamicy górnych dróg moczowych. Urologia 89. Oddz. Warszawski P.T.U., 1990.

  4. Gajda M, Tyloch F, Tyloch J, Skok Z, Spychalska T, Łapuć A, Sujkowksa R. Evaluation of renal function in industrial workers, based on cytologic examination of urine sediments. Med Prac 1993; 44: 29.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gajda M, Tyloch F, Tyloch J, Skok Z, Sujkowska R. The role of the esoinophilic granulocytes in urine sediment in patients treated because of BPH. Urol Pol 1995; 48: 227.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Helpap B. Pathologie der ableitenden Harnwege und Prostata. Springer-Verlag, 1989.

  7. Highman W, Wilson E. Urine cytology in patients with calculi. J Clin Pathol 1982; 35: 350.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoppe E, Kunz B. Diagnostische Problematik der Urinzytologie nach Urographie. GBK. Fortbildung aktuell 1992; 60/61: 39.

    Google Scholar 

  9. James W, Eagon J. Urinary tract cytology. In: Hill GS, editor. Uropathology, 1989.

  10. Jonitz H, Heinz A. Bakterielle Besiedlung von Hamsteinen bei negativer Urinbakteriologie. Akt Urol 1987; 18: 28.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klocke K, Winter P, Schoeneich G. Zur Notwendigkeit der Metaphylaxe von Nierensteinbildnern im Zeitalter der extrakorporalen Stoßwellenbehandlung. Urologe B 1993; 33: 74.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Knapp P, Kulb T, Lingemann J, Newmann D, Mertz J, Mosbaugh P, Stelle R. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsyinduced perirenal hematomas. J Urol 1988; 139: 700.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Oka T, Imazu T, Nishimura K, Tsujimura A, Sugao H, Takaha M. Clinical studies on the need of prophylactic antibiotics during extracorporeal shock ware lithotripsy. Hinyokika Kiyo 1993; 39: 791.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pietrautuono M, Prata SM, Maraone A, Vecchio D. Carcinoma squamocellulare della pelvi renale e calcolosi: descuizione di un caso. Acta Urol Ital 1992; 2: 113.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pfab R, Kleiber W, Kropp W, Hegemann M, Hartung R. Das endoskopisch sichtbare, jedoch radiologisch nicht erkennbare Restkonkrement. Fortschr Urol Nephrol 1988; 26: 292.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Prajsner A, Szkodny A, Noga A, Szewczyk W, Szkodny G. Combination of PCNL and ESWL in treatment of staghorn calculosis of the kidneys. Urol Pol 1992; 45: 176.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schneider HJ. Ätiologie und Pathogenese der Urolithiasis. Urologe A 1980; 19: 195.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sökeland J. Harnsteinleiden. Dt Ärzteblatt 1985; 32: 32.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schubert GE. Niere und ableitende Harnwege. In: Remmele W, editor. Pathologie, Band 3. Springer-Verlag, 1987.

  20. Takahashi H. Farbatlas der onkologischen Zytologie. Fachbuch-Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, 1987.

  21. Tyloch F, Tyloch J, Gajda M, Korenkiewicz J, Sujkowska R. Evaluation of cytological tests results of urinary sediment in patients with suspected neoplasms of the urinary system, treated in the Urological Department of the Medical Academy in Bydgoszcz. Urol Pol 1992; 45: 128.

    Google Scholar 

  22. De Voogt HJ, Rathert P, Beyer-Boon H. Urinary Cytology. Springer-Verlag, 1977.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gajda, M., Tyloch, J., Tyloch, F. et al. Urine cytology in patients with urinary tract calculosis. Int Urol Nephrol 32, 315–320 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017518825573

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017518825573

Navigation