Abstract
The relationship between urinary tract infection caused by urease-producing bacteria and lithiasis due to struvite stones is well established in the literature. However, there is limited knowledge on whether non-urease producing bacteria can also promote crystallization. In our study, we analyzed the association between urinary lithiasis, other than struvite by crystallography and non-ureolytic bacteria, in 153 patients who underwent surgery for urinary stone. The collected samples were sent for crystallographic analysis and culture. Additionally, preoperatory urine culture was collected for combined evaluation with the previous data. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy was the most commonly performed approach (45.8%). Struvite stones were more frequently identified in women (90.3%). Among stones with positive cultures, except struvite, 45.5% were composed of calcium oxalate monohydrate. The difference between urine culture and stone culture was different in 24.8% of the cases. Among stones with positive cultures that did not contain struvite, 86.4% showed non-urease bacteria in their cultures and 47.1% of struvite stones also did not have urease-producing bacteria in their cultures (p < 0.021). Our findings suggest that there is an association between non-ureolytic bacteria and stones that are not composed of struvite.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AMP:
-
Ammonium magnesium phosphate
- CC:
-
Calculi culture
- CC−:
-
Negative calculi culture
- CC+:
-
Positive calculi culture
- COD:
-
Calcium oxalate dihydrate
- COM:
-
Calcium oxalate monohydrate
- MIXED:
-
Double composition, except struvite
- PCNL:
-
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
- PCP:
-
Pure calcium phosphate
- SIRS:
-
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome
- ST−:
-
Negative struvite
- ST+:
-
Positive struvite
- UC:
-
Urine culture
- UHS:
-
Unified health system
- URIC:
-
Uric acid
- UTI:
-
Urinary tract infection
References
Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos DG (2010) Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Rev Urol 12(2–3):e86–e96
Morgan MS, Pearle MS (2016) Medical management of renal stones. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 352:i52. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i52
Heilberg IP, Korkes F, Schor N (2016) Epidemiologia da Litíase urinária no Brasil. In: Heilberg P, Schor N (eds) Cálculo Renal: investigação e terapêutica Ita, 1st edn. Balieiro, São Paulo, pp 1–7
Ramello A, Vitale C, Marangella M (2000) Epidemiology of nephrolithiasis. J Nephrol 13(Suppl 3):S45–S50
Pearle MS, Calhoun EA, Curhan GC (2015) Urologic diseases of America project: urolithiasis. J Urol 173(3):848–857. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000152082.14384.d7
Saigal CS, Joyce G, Timilsina AR (2005) Urologic diseases in America project direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: opportunity for disease management? Kidney Int 68(4):1808–1814. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00599.x
Das P, Gupta G, Velu V et al (2017) Formation of struvite urinary stones and approaches towards the inhibition—a review. Biomed Pharmacother 96:361–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.10.015
Cógáin MR, Lieske JC, Vrtiska TJ et al (2014) Secondarily infected nonstruvite urolithiasis: a prospective evaluation. Urology 84(6):1295–1300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.007
Nickel JC, Olson M, McLean RJ et al (1987) An ecological study of infected urinary stone genesis in an animal model. Br J Urol 59(1):21–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1987.tb04573.x
Grases F et al (2002) Simple classification of renal calculi closely related to their micromorphology and etiology. Clin Chim Acta 322(1–2):29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-8981(02)00063-3
Korkes F, Silva JL, Heilberg IP (2011) Custo do tratamento hospitalar da litíase urinária no sistema público de saúde no Brasil. Einstein 9(4):518–522
Diri A, Diri B (2018) Management of staghorn renal stones. Ren Fail 40(1):357–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2018.1459306
Ziemba JB, Matlaga BR (2017) Epidemiology and economics of nephrolithiasis. Investig Clin Urol 58(5):299–306. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.2017.58.5.299
Lieske JC, Peña de la Vega LS, Slezak JM et al (2006) Renal stone epidemiology in Rochester, Minnesota: an update. Kidney Int 69(4):760–764. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5000150
Cunha TS, Rodrigues A, Heilberg IP (2020) Influence of socioeconomic disparities, temperature and humidity in kidney stone composition. J Bras Nefrol 42(4):454–460. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2019-0206
Meretyk S, Gofrit ON, Gafni O et al (1997) Complete staghorn calculi: random prospective comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy and combined with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 157(3):780–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65039-0
Kirshenbaum EJ, Doshi C, Dornbier R et al (2019) Socioeconomic disparities in the acute management of stone disease in the United States. J Endourol 33(2):167–172. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0760
Ahmad TR, Tzou DT, Usawachintachit M et al (2019) Low income and nonwhite race are strongly associated with worse quality of life in patients with nephrolithiasis. J Urol 202(1):119–124. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000233
Schoenfeld D, Mohn L, Agalliu I, Stern JM (2020) Disparities in care among patients presenting to the emergency department for urinary stone disease. Urolithiasis 48(3):217–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-019-01136-y
Singh I, Shah S, Gupta S, Singh NP (2019) Efficacy of intraoperative renal stone culture in predicting postpercutaneous nephrolithotomy urosepsis/systemic inflammatory response syndrome: a prospective analytical study with review of literature. J Endourol 33(2):84–92. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0842
Ahmed AE, Abol-Enein H, Awadalla A et al (2023) Metabolic stone workup abnormalities are not as important as stone culture in patients with recurrent stones undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis 51(1):47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-023-01422-w
Ripa F, Pietropaolo A, Montanari E et al (2022) Association of kidney stones and recurrent UTIs: the chicken and egg situation. a systematic review of literature. Curr Urol Rep 23(9):165–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-022-01103-y
Flannigan R, Choy WH, Chew B, Lange D (2014) Renal struvite stones–pathogenesis, microbiology, and management strategies. Nat Rev Urol 11(6):333–341. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2014.99
Chutipongtanate S, Sutthimethakorn S, Chiangjong W et al (2013) Bacteria can promote calcium oxalate crystal growth and aggregation. J Biol Inorg Chem 18(3):299–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00775-012-0974-0
Djojodimedjo T, Soebadi DM, Soetjipto, (2013) Escherichia coli infection induces mucosal damage and expression of proteins promoting urinary stone formation. Urolithiasis 41(4):295–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-013-0577-4
Tavichakorntrakool R, Prasongwattana V, Sungkeeree S et al (2012) Extensive characterizations of bacteria isolated from catheterized urine and stone matrices in patients with nephrolithiasis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 27(11):4125–4130. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfs057
Kanlaya R, Thongboonkerd V (2022) Persistent Escherichia coli infection in renal tubular cells enhances calcium oxalate crystal-cell adhesion by inducing ezrin translocation to apical membranes via Rho/ROCK pathway. Cell Mol Life Sci 79(7):381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-022-04414-y
Bazin D, André G, Weil R et al (2012) Absence of bacterial imprints on struvite-containing kidney stones: a structural investigation at the mesoscopic and atomic scale. Urology 79(4):786–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.08.054
Grases F, García-Ferragut L, Costa-Bauzá A (1996) Study of the early stages of renal stone formation: experimental model using urothelium of pig urinary bladder. Urol Res 24(5):305–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00304781
Puia D, Gheorghincă Ş, Radavoi GD et al (2023) Can we identify the risk factors for SIRS/sepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A meta-analysis and literature review. Exp Ther Med 25(3):110. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.11809
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge Dr. Tamara da Silva Cunha for her invaluable contribution in carrying out all crystallographic analyses.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
It is declared that all authors listed in this study contributed intensely to the preparation, execution, data manipulation, writing of the work and critical reading. J.C.M - wrote the main manuscript text, contributed to the preparation of the project, data collection. M.M.D.N - contributed to the preparation of the project, data collection and manuscript text. J.M.R - coordinated the project since its preparation, participated in data collection and contributed to the critical review of the written work. J.E.F.M - coordinated the project since its preparation, participated in data collection and contributed to the critical review of the written work. G.M.V - contributed to the preparation of the project and data collection. A.C.A.C - contributed to the preparation of the project and data collection
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
da Cruz Machado, J., Miguel Renteria, J., Medeiros do Nascimento, M. et al. Association between urinary lithiasis, other than struvite by crystallography and non-ureolytic bacteria. Urolithiasis 52, 28 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-023-01525-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-023-01525-4