Skip to main content
Log in

Association between urinary lithiasis, other than struvite by crystallography and non-ureolytic bacteria

  • Research
  • Published:
Urolithiasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between urinary tract infection caused by urease-producing bacteria and lithiasis due to struvite stones is well established in the literature. However, there is limited knowledge on whether non-urease producing bacteria can also promote crystallization. In our study, we analyzed the association between urinary lithiasis, other than struvite by crystallography and non-ureolytic bacteria, in 153 patients who underwent surgery for urinary stone. The collected samples were sent for crystallographic analysis and culture. Additionally, preoperatory urine culture was collected for combined evaluation with the previous data. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy was the most commonly performed approach (45.8%). Struvite stones were more frequently identified in women (90.3%). Among stones with positive cultures, except struvite, 45.5% were composed of calcium oxalate monohydrate. The difference between urine culture and stone culture was different in 24.8% of the cases. Among stones with positive cultures that did not contain struvite, 86.4% showed non-urease bacteria in their cultures and 47.1% of struvite stones also did not have urease-producing bacteria in their cultures (p < 0.021). Our findings suggest that there is an association between non-ureolytic bacteria and stones that are not composed of struvite.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AMP:

Ammonium magnesium phosphate

CC:

Calculi culture

CC−:

Negative calculi culture

CC+:

Positive calculi culture

COD:

Calcium oxalate dihydrate

COM:

Calcium oxalate monohydrate

MIXED:

Double composition, except struvite

PCNL:

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy

PCP:

Pure calcium phosphate

SIRS:

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome

ST−:

Negative struvite

ST+:

Positive struvite

UC:

Urine culture

UHS:

Unified health system

URIC:

Uric acid

UTI:

Urinary tract infection

References

  1. Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos DG (2010) Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Rev Urol 12(2–3):e86–e96

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Morgan MS, Pearle MS (2016) Medical management of renal stones. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 352:i52. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Heilberg IP, Korkes F, Schor N (2016) Epidemiologia da Litíase urinária no Brasil. In: Heilberg P, Schor N (eds) Cálculo Renal: investigação e terapêutica Ita, 1st edn. Balieiro, São Paulo, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ramello A, Vitale C, Marangella M (2000) Epidemiology of nephrolithiasis. J Nephrol 13(Suppl 3):S45–S50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pearle MS, Calhoun EA, Curhan GC (2015) Urologic diseases of America project: urolithiasis. J Urol 173(3):848–857. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000152082.14384.d7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Saigal CS, Joyce G, Timilsina AR (2005) Urologic diseases in America project direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: opportunity for disease management? Kidney Int 68(4):1808–1814. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00599.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Das P, Gupta G, Velu V et al (2017) Formation of struvite urinary stones and approaches towards the inhibition—a review. Biomed Pharmacother 96:361–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.10.015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cógáin MR, Lieske JC, Vrtiska TJ et al (2014) Secondarily infected nonstruvite urolithiasis: a prospective evaluation. Urology 84(6):1295–1300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nickel JC, Olson M, McLean RJ et al (1987) An ecological study of infected urinary stone genesis in an animal model. Br J Urol 59(1):21–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1987.tb04573.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grases F et al (2002) Simple classification of renal calculi closely related to their micromorphology and etiology. Clin Chim Acta 322(1–2):29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-8981(02)00063-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Korkes F, Silva JL, Heilberg IP (2011) Custo do tratamento hospitalar da litíase urinária no sistema público de saúde no Brasil. Einstein 9(4):518–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Diri A, Diri B (2018) Management of staghorn renal stones. Ren Fail 40(1):357–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2018.1459306

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ziemba JB, Matlaga BR (2017) Epidemiology and economics of nephrolithiasis. Investig Clin Urol 58(5):299–306. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.2017.58.5.299

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lieske JC, Peña de la Vega LS, Slezak JM et al (2006) Renal stone epidemiology in Rochester, Minnesota: an update. Kidney Int 69(4):760–764. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5000150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cunha TS, Rodrigues A, Heilberg IP (2020) Influence of socioeconomic disparities, temperature and humidity in kidney stone composition. J Bras Nefrol 42(4):454–460. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2019-0206

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Meretyk S, Gofrit ON, Gafni O et al (1997) Complete staghorn calculi: random prospective comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy and combined with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 157(3):780–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65039-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kirshenbaum EJ, Doshi C, Dornbier R et al (2019) Socioeconomic disparities in the acute management of stone disease in the United States. J Endourol 33(2):167–172. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahmad TR, Tzou DT, Usawachintachit M et al (2019) Low income and nonwhite race are strongly associated with worse quality of life in patients with nephrolithiasis. J Urol 202(1):119–124. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schoenfeld D, Mohn L, Agalliu I, Stern JM (2020) Disparities in care among patients presenting to the emergency department for urinary stone disease. Urolithiasis 48(3):217–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-019-01136-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Singh I, Shah S, Gupta S, Singh NP (2019) Efficacy of intraoperative renal stone culture in predicting postpercutaneous nephrolithotomy urosepsis/systemic inflammatory response syndrome: a prospective analytical study with review of literature. J Endourol 33(2):84–92. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahmed AE, Abol-Enein H, Awadalla A et al (2023) Metabolic stone workup abnormalities are not as important as stone culture in patients with recurrent stones undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis 51(1):47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-023-01422-w

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ripa F, Pietropaolo A, Montanari E et al (2022) Association of kidney stones and recurrent UTIs: the chicken and egg situation. a systematic review of literature. Curr Urol Rep 23(9):165–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-022-01103-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Flannigan R, Choy WH, Chew B, Lange D (2014) Renal struvite stones–pathogenesis, microbiology, and management strategies. Nat Rev Urol 11(6):333–341. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2014.99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chutipongtanate S, Sutthimethakorn S, Chiangjong W et al (2013) Bacteria can promote calcium oxalate crystal growth and aggregation. J Biol Inorg Chem 18(3):299–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00775-012-0974-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Djojodimedjo T, Soebadi DM, Soetjipto, (2013) Escherichia coli infection induces mucosal damage and expression of proteins promoting urinary stone formation. Urolithiasis 41(4):295–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-013-0577-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tavichakorntrakool R, Prasongwattana V, Sungkeeree S et al (2012) Extensive characterizations of bacteria isolated from catheterized urine and stone matrices in patients with nephrolithiasis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 27(11):4125–4130. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfs057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kanlaya R, Thongboonkerd V (2022) Persistent Escherichia coli infection in renal tubular cells enhances calcium oxalate crystal-cell adhesion by inducing ezrin translocation to apical membranes via Rho/ROCK pathway. Cell Mol Life Sci 79(7):381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-022-04414-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bazin D, André G, Weil R et al (2012) Absence of bacterial imprints on struvite-containing kidney stones: a structural investigation at the mesoscopic and atomic scale. Urology 79(4):786–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.08.054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Grases F, García-Ferragut L, Costa-Bauzá A (1996) Study of the early stages of renal stone formation: experimental model using urothelium of pig urinary bladder. Urol Res 24(5):305–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00304781

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Puia D, Gheorghincă Ş, Radavoi GD et al (2023) Can we identify the risk factors for SIRS/sepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A meta-analysis and literature review. Exp Ther Med 25(3):110. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.11809

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Dr. Tamara da Silva Cunha for her invaluable contribution in carrying out all crystallographic analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

It is declared that all authors listed in this study contributed intensely to the preparation, execution, data manipulation, writing of the work and critical reading. J.C.M - wrote the main manuscript text, contributed to the preparation of the project, data collection. M.M.D.N - contributed to the preparation of the project, data collection and manuscript text. J.M.R - coordinated the project since its preparation, participated in data collection and contributed to the critical review of the written work. J.E.F.M - coordinated the project since its preparation, participated in data collection and contributed to the critical review of the written work. G.M.V - contributed to the preparation of the project and data collection. A.C.A.C - contributed to the preparation of the project and data collection

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jackson da Cruz Machado.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

da Cruz Machado, J., Miguel Renteria, J., Medeiros do Nascimento, M. et al. Association between urinary lithiasis, other than struvite by crystallography and non-ureolytic bacteria. Urolithiasis 52, 28 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-023-01525-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-023-01525-4

Keywords

Navigation