Skip to main content
Log in

The Study of Language in Organizations: A Symbolic Interactionist Stance

  • Published:
Human Relations

Abstract

Very few models have been developed fromresearch on language in organizations, and those thatexist are usually very general. In addition, theassumptions on which they are based are not alwaysexplicit, which means that the limits of the modelsthemselves cannot be seen. After describing thecharacteristics of research that could be done onlanguage from an objectivist and a subjectivist stance,and specifying the limits of these two fundamental views, thispaper proposes an explicit model for understandinglanguage based on a symbolic interactionist stance, withemphasis on ascribing meaning and understanding language in the context of the interactivesituation in which it occurs. The interactive situationcomprises three fundamental components: theenvironmental, cognitive, and emotional contexts. In themodel, the tongue and psycholinguistic schemata of theindividuals concerned inevitably have a restrictiveeffect on the language used, and the language contextmay help make the speaker's remarks meaningful. The assumptions underlying the choice of asymbolic interactionist stance are described, and thepaper ends with some suggested avenues for researchrevealing new topics or new ways of studying oldtopics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aktouf, O. La parole dans la vie de l'entreprise: Faits e t méfaits. Gestion. Revue internationale de gestion, 1986, 11(4), 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andler, D. Calcul et représentation: Les sources. In D. Andler (Ed.), Introduction aux sciences cognitives. Collection “Folio/Essais.” Paris: Gallimard, 1992, pp. 9–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. Productive and counterproductive re asoning proce ss. In S. Srivastva (Ed.), The executive mind. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1983, pp. 25–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. Theory in practice: In creasing profesionnal effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audet, M., Landry, M., & Déry, R. Science et résolution de problème: Liens, difficultés et voies de dépassement dans le champ des science s de l'administration. Philosophy of the Social Sciences/Philosoph ie des Sciences Sociales, 1986, 16, 409–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R, (Ed.). Structure of decision: The cognitive maps of political elites. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Unive rsity Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, B. E., & Moore, L. F. Linking the host culture to organizational variables. In P. J. Frost, L. F. Moore, M. R. Louis, C.C. Lundberg and J. Martin (Eds.), Organizational culture. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1985, pp. 335–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakar, R. M. Language as a means of social power. In R. Romme tveit and R. M. Blakar (Eds.), Studies of language, thought and communication. London: Academic Press, 1979, pp. 104–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. Sociological implications of the thought of George He rbert Mead. American Journal of Sociology, 1966, 71(5), 535–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boden, D. The business of talk. Cambridge, UK: Polity Pre ss, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bougon, M. G. Uncovering cognitive maps: The self-Q technique. In G. Morgan (Ed.),Beyond method. Strategies for social research. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1983, pp. 173–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bougon, M. G. Congregate cognitive maps: A unified dynamic theory of organization and strategy. Journal of Management Studies, 1992, 29(3), 369–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bougon, M. G., Weick, K. E., & Binkhorst, D. Cognition in organizations: An analysis of the Utrecht Jazz Orchestra. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1977, 22, 606–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. London: He inemann Educational Books, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanlat, J.-F. (Ed.). L'individu dans l'organisation: les dimensions oubliées. Collection “Science s de l'administration.” Québec/Paris: Les Presse s de l'Universi té Laval/éditions ESKA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancy, J. J. The in visible powers: The language of business. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J. A. Inspiring others: The language of leadership. Academ y of Managem ent Executive, 1991, 5(1), 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossette, P. (Ed.). Cartes cognitives et organizations. Collection “Science s de l'administration.” Québec/Paris: Les Presses de l'Université Laval/éditions ESKA, 1994. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossette, P. Déve loppement d'une méthode systématique d'aide à la mise au point de la vision stratégique chez le propriétaire-dirigeant de PME: Une étude exploratoire. In Actes de la 39e Conféren ce an nu elle mon diale de l'In ternational Council for Small Business (ICSB). Strasbourg, 1994, pp. 73–82. (b)

  • Cossette, P., & Audet, M. Mapping of an idiosyncratic schema. Journ al of Managem ent Studies, 1992, 29(3), 325–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossette, P., & Audet, M. Qu'est-ce qu'une carte cognitive? In P. Cossette (Ed.), Cartes cognitives et organ isations, Collection “Sciences de l'administration.” Québec/Paris: Le s Presse s de l'Université Laval/éditions ESKA, 1994, pp. 13–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Saussure, F. Cours de linguistique générale (1st éd., 1916). Paris: Payot, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearborn, D. C., & Simon, H. A. Selective perception: A note on the departmental identifications of exe cutive s. Sociometry, 1958, 21, 140–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deetz, S. Metaphors and the discursive production and reproduction of organization. In L. Thayer (Ed.), Communication-organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1986, pp. 168–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, M. Image et cognition. Paris: Presses Unive rsitaires de France, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, S. L., & Lamoureux, G. Initiation à la psychologie du travail. Bouche rville, Québec: Gaëtan Morin, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnellon, A. Language and communication in organizations: Bridging cognition and behavior. In H. P. Sims, Jr. and D. A. Gioia (Eds.), The thinking organization: Dynamics of organizational social cognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986, pp. 136–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnellon, A., Gray, B., & Bougon, M. Communication, me aning and organized action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1986, 31, 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey, H. K., & Brief, A. P. How cognitive structures affect organizational design: Implicit theories of organizing. In H. P. Sims, Jr & D. A. Gioia (Eds.), The thinking organization: Dynamics of organizational social cognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986, pp. 165–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. E., Fahey, L., & Narayanan, V. K. Toward understanding strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic Managem ent Journal, 1983, 4, 307–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., & Huxham, C. Action rese arch for the study of organizations. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies. London: Sage, 1996, pp. 526–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., Jones, S., & Sims, D. Messing about in problems. Oxford: Pergamon, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evered, R. The language of organization: The case of the Navy. In L. R. Pondy, P. J. Frost, G. Morgan, and T. C. Dandridge (Eds.), Organization al symbolism. Gree nwich, CT: JAI Press, 1983, pp. 125–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evered, R., & Louis, M. R. Alternative perspectives in the organizational sciences: “Inquiry from the inside” and “inquiry from the outside. Academy of Managem ent Review, 1981, 6, 385–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiol, C. M., & Huff, A. S. Maps for manage rs: Where are we? Whe re do we go from here? Journal of Man agement Studies, 1992, 29(3), 267–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. D., & Hegarty, W. H. Decision make rs' beliefs about the cause s and e ffects of structure: An exploratory study. Academ y of Management Journal, 1984, 27, 271–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, F. Patterns of individual and organizational learning. In S. Srivastva (Ed.), The executive mind. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1983, pp. 192–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A. Symbols, scripts, and sensemaking: Creating meaning in the organizational experience. In H. P. Sims, Jr. and D. A. Gioia (Eds.), The thinking organ ization: Dynamics of organizational social cognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986, pp. 49–74. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A. Conclusion: The state of the art in organizational social cognition: A personal view. In H. P. Sims, Jr. and D. A. Gioia (Eds.), The thinking organization: dynamics of organizational social cognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986, pp. 336–356. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A., Donnellon, A., & Sims, H. P. Jr. Communication and cognition in appraisal: A tale of two paradigms. Organization Studies, 1994, 10(4), 503–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girin, J. Le siège vertical: Vivre e t communique r dans une tour de bureaux. Annales des mines-Gérer et compren dre, 1987, 9, 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girin, J. Problèmes du langage dans les organisations. In J.-F. Chanlat (Ed.), L'individu dans l'organ isation: Les dimen sions ou bliées. Colle ct ion “Scie nce s de l'administration.” Québec/Paris: Les Presses de l'Université Laval/éditions ESKA, 1990, pp. 37–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B., Bougon, M. G., & Donnellon, A. Organizations as constructions and destructions of meaning. Journal of Management, 1985, 11(2), 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grize, J.-B. Logique nature lle e t représentations sociale s. In D. Jodelet (Ed.), Les représentations sociales. Paris: Pre sse s Unive rsitaires de France, 1989, pp. 152–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isenberg, D. J. The structure and proce ss of understanding. In H. P. Sims, Jr., and D. A. Gioia (Eds.), The thinking organization: Dynamics of organizational social cognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986, pp. 238–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. L. Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: Unive rsity of Chicago Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry, M. A note on the concept of “problem.” Organization Studies, 1995, 16(2), 315–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G., & Foti, R. J. Schema theories, information processing, and organizational behaviors. In H. P. Sims, Jr. and D. A. Gioia (Eds.). The thinking organization: Dynamics of organizational social cognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986, pp. 20–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangham, I. L. Power and performance in organ izations. Oxford: Basic Blackwell, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J., & Simon, H. Organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. The nature of managerial work. New York: Harpe r and Row, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. Qualitative and action based research. In Actes du colloque “Perspective de recherche pour le praticien.” Rouyn: Unive rsité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, 1985, pp. 81–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. Images de l'organisation. Collection “Sciences de l'administration.” Québec: Les Presses de l'Université Laval; Paris: éditions ESKA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici, S. Communications processes and the properties of language. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 3). New York: Academic Press, 1967, pp. 225–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. In L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior. Gree nwich, CT: JAI Press, 1981, pp. 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pondy, L. R. The role of metaphors and myths in organization and in the facilitation of change. In L. R. Pondy, P. J. Frost, G. Morgan, and T. C. Dandridge (Eds.), Organizational symbolism. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1983, pp. 157–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pondy, L. R., & Mitroff, I. I. Beyond open system models of organization. In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1). Gree nwich, CT: JAI Press, 1979, pp. 3–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimé, B. Langage e t communication. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Psychologie sociale. Paris: Presses Universitaire s de France, 1984, pp. 415–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, E. Culture, language and personality. Berkeley: Unive rsity of California Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Josse y-Bass, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. The theory of organizations. New York: Basic Books, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smircich, L. Studying organizations as cultures. In G. Morgan (Ed.), Beyond method. Strategies for social research. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1983, pp. 160–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolenski, P. IA connexionniste, IA symbolique e t ce rveau. In D. Andler (Ed.), In troduction aux sciences cognitives. Collection “Folio/ Essais.” Paris: Gallimard, 1992, pp. 77–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbart, C. I., & Ramaprasad, A. Probing two chief executives schematic knowledge of the U.S. steel industry using cognitive maps. In R. Lamb and P. Shrivastava (Eds.), Advances in strategic managem ent. Greenwich, CT: JAI Pre ss, 1988, pp. 139–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susman, G. I., & Evered, R. D. An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978, 23, 582–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P. La réalité de la réalité. Paris: Seuil, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. The social psychology of organizing. (2nd éd.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., & Bougon, M. G. Organizations as cognitive maps: Charting ways to sucess and failure. In H. P. Sims, Jr. and D. A. Gioia (Eds.), The thinking organization: Dynamics of organizational social cognition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986, pp. 102–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whorf, B. Linguistique et anthropologie. Paris: Denoël-Gonthier, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. Ressemblance et communication. In D. Andler (Ed.), Introdu ction aux sciences cognitives. Collection “Folio/Essais.” Paris: Gallimard, 1992, pp. 219–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T. What does it mean to understand language ? Cognitive Science, 1980, 4, 209–241.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cossette, P. The Study of Language in Organizations: A Symbolic Interactionist Stance. Human Relations 51, 1355–1377 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016998316635

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016998316635

Navigation