Skip to main content
Log in

The Primary Risk

  • Published:
Human Relations

Abstract

In the Tavistock tradition, we understand anorganization by first identifying its primary task. Weask, what is this organization set up to do, how is itorganized to accomplish this objective, and what unconscious dynamics limit or distort itsmembers' ability to do their work? This approach whilepowerful, does not help us understand organizations thatlive at strategic junctures in their life cycles. In these situations, the task is to choose atask. We need a conceptual framework to help usunderstand the psychodynamics of organizing and decidingin these situations. The following article develops the concept of the “primary risk”to explain how organizations behave in these situations.It links the primary risk to the psychoanalytic idea ofambivalence and the gestalt idea of the figure/ground relationship. It draws on case material toilluminate its concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Carlton, J. Apple: The inside story of intrigue, egomania, and business blunders, New York: Random House, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. Formulations on the two principles of mental functioning (standard ed., Vol. 12), pp. 1911, 218–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. Mourning and melancholia (standard ed., Vol. 14), pp. 1917, 243–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. R. Organization design, Reading: Addison-Wesely, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawasaki, G. The Macintosh way: The art of guerrilla management. New York: Harper Perrenial, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, G. Management development: Some ideals, images and realities. In A. D. Colman and M. H. Geller (Eds.), Group relations reader 2, Washington, D.C.: A.K. Rice Institite, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E., & Rice, K. A, Task and sentient systems and their boundary controls, In E. Trist, and H. Murray (Eds.), The social engagement of social science (Vol. 1), Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossberg, W. Apple May Be Ripe for a Takeover. All Things Considered, National Public Radio Transcript, 01–27–1996, Washington, D.C., 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Larry Hirschhorn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hirschhorn, L. The Primary Risk. Human Relations 52, 5–23 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016916315243

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016916315243

Navigation