Skip to main content
Log in

Avian richness and abundance in temperate Danish forests: tree variables important to birds and their conservation

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many studies on avian diversity and forest structure have focused onfiner scale forest variables such as foliage height diversity, foliagediversity, foliage density, vertical distribution of vegetation and horizontalvegetation density. From a conservation and forestry operational point of viewit would be of great interest if tree variables influenced directly by forestrymanagement decisions also had significant influence on avian richness andabundance. The species, age and size of a tree are examples of such treevariables. A great number of studies also have focused on avian diversityindices to reveal relationships with vegetation variables. However, it may bemore appropriate for foresters and conservation officers to operate withrichness and abundance measures directly, because indices complicateinterpretations on the relative importance of the two variables (richness andabundance) constituting the index. Fourteen managed temperate forests in Denmarkwere investigated for avian species richness and abundance and related tomeasures on different tree variables influenced directly by forestry managementdecisions. A rapid assessment method of avian richness and abundance wasemployed. It consisted of point-counts of bird richness and abundance within 1km2 of forest. General linear models were tested byanalyses of variance statistics to reveal the tree variables most important toavian richness and abundance. It was found that more old trees, more treespecies and more tree size-classes correlated with more bird species andindividuals. However, some variation in bird richness and abundance was alsorelated to site quality and/or chance colonization. Moreover, it was shown thatthe guild of cavity-nesting birds correlated positively to age of tree stand.The potential number of bird species in Danish forest is similar to that innearly pristine forest in Poland, and much larger than that recorded in any ofthe forests investigated. Together with the results above, this indicates a highpotential for squeezing in more avian species in a higher quality forest from abiodiversity point of view. Modern Danish forestry affects tree variablesinfluenced directly by forestry management decisions. Such tree variables havegreat influence on avian richness and abundance, but simple measures in forestrypractices can be taken to enhance the conservation of bird richness andabundance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlén I., Anderson Å., Aulen G. and Pettersson B. 1978. Vitryggig hackspett och mellanspett — två hotade arters ekologi. Anser 3: 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold G.W. 1988. The effects of habitat structure and floristics on the densities of bird species in Wandoo Woodland. Australian Wildlife Research 15: 499–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume D. 1977. Die Buntspechte (Gattung Dendrocopos). A. Ziemsen Verlag, Wittenberg Lutherstadt, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brøgger-Jensen S. 1992. Fuglesamfund i naturskove. In: Sørensen P. and Thomsen K. (eds), Danmarks naturskove. Symposium at Aarhus University, 28 March 1992. Regnskovsgruppen Nepenthes, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brøgger-Jensen S. 1996. The influence of forest management on the occurrence and densities of Danish woodland birds, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown J.H. and Kodric-Brown A. 1977. Turnover rate in insular biogeography: effects of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58: 445–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buffington J.M., Kilgo J.C., Sargent R.A., Miller K.V. and Chapman B.R. 1997. Comparison of breeding bird communities in bottomland hardwood forests of different successional stages. Wilson Bulletin 109: 314–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramp S. 1988. The Birds of the Western Palearctic, Vol. 5. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramp S. 1992. The Birds of the Western Palearctic, Vol. 6. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramp S. and Simmons K.E.L. 1982a. The Birds of the Western Palearctic, Vol. 1. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramp S. and Simmons K.E.L. 1982b. The Birds of the Western Palearctic, Vol. 2. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geodætisk Institut 1960a. Danmark 1:100,000. Generalstabskort II. Det sydlige Jylland og Fyn. Geodætisk Institut, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geodætisk Institut 1960b. Danmark 1:100,000. Getineralstabskort III. Øerne øst for Store Bælt. Geodætisk Institut, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geodætisk Institut 1961. Danmark 1:100,000. Generalstabskort I. Det nordlige Jylland. Geodætisk Institut, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geodætisk Institut 1982. Danmark 1:100,000. Topografisk Atlas. Geodætisk Institut, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grell M.B. 1998. Fuglenes Danmark. Gads Forlag, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hågvar S., Hågvar G. and Mønnes E. 1990. Nest site selection in Norwegian woodpeckers. Holarctic Ecology 13: 156–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan J.M., McKinley P.S., Meehan A.L. and Grove S.L. 1997. Diversity and abundance of landbirds in a northeastern industrial forest. Journal of Wildlife Management 61: 718–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen P. 1989. Finker, Smådrosler. In: Meltofte H. and Fjeldsa J. (eds), Fuglene i Danmark 2. Gyldendal, Copenhagen, pp. 177–188, 291–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hino T. 1990. Palaearctic deciduous forests and their bird communities: comparisons between East Asia and West Central Europe. In: Keast A. (ed.), Biogeography and Ecology of Forest Bird Communities. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, the Netherlands, pp. 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • James F.C. and Wamer N.O. 1982. Relationships between temperate forest bird communities and vegetation structure. Ecology 63: 159–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenny L. 1983. Habitatnutzung, narungserwerb und nahrung von Mittel-und Buntspecht (Dendrocopus medius und D. major) sowie bemerkungen zur verbreitungsgeschichte des Mittelspechts. Ornitologische Beobachter 80: 29–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joensen A.H. 1965. En undersøgelse af fuglebestanden i fire løvskovsområder på Als i 1962 og 1963. Dansk Ornitologisk Forenings Tidsskrift 59: 116–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • King D.I. and DeGraaf R.M. 2000. Bird species diversity and nesting success in mature, clearcut and shelterwood forest in northern New Hampshire, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 129: 227–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komdeur J., Gabrielsen L. and Hounissen J.P. 1993. The role of forest structure and management for woodland birds in Denmark. Technical Report no. 76. National Environment Research Institute, Kalø, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krabbe E. 1987. En sammenlignende økologisk feltundersøgelse af Munk Sylvia atricapilla (Linnaeus) og Havesanger Sylvia borin (Boddaert) på ynglepladsen, M.Sc. Thesis, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropil R. 1996. Structure of the breeding bird assemblage of the fir-beech primeval forest in the West Carpathians (Badin Nature Reserve). Folia Zoologica 45: 311–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kujawa K. 1997. Relationships between the structure of mid-field woods and their breeding bird communities. Acta Ornithologica 32: 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurlavicius P. 1995. Birds of Forest Islands in South-East Baltic Region. Baltic ECO,Vilnius, Lithuania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laursen K. 1989. Sangere. In: Meltofte H. and Fjeldså J. (eds), Fuglene i Danmark 2. Gyldendal, Copenhagen, pp. 200–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder P. and Östlund L. 1998. Structural changes in three mid-boreal Swedish forest landscapes, 1885–1996. Biological Conservation 85: 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur R.H. and MacArthur J.W. 1961. On bird species diversity. Ecology 42: 594–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller A.P. 1989. Silkehale, Vandstær, Gærdesmutte, Jernspurv. In: Meltofte H. and Fjeldså J. (eds), Fuglene i Danmark 2. Gyldendal, Copenhagen, pp. 167–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller P.F. 1997a. Natural woodland in Denmark. In: Møller P.F. (ed.), Biodiversity in Danish Natural Forests. A Comparison Between Unmanaged and Managed Woodlands in East Denmark.WWF and GEUS, Copenhagen, pp. 14–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller P.F. 1997b. Differences between natural, virgin and cultural forest. In: Møller P.F. (ed.), Biodiversity in Danish Natural Forests. A Comparison Between Unmanaged and Managed Woodlands in East Denmark. WWF and GEUS, Copenhagen, pp. 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Forest and Nature Agency 1994a. Strategy for Sustainable Forest Management. Ministry of the Environment, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Forest and Nature Agency 1994b. Strategy for Natural Forests and other Forest Types of High Conservation Value in Denmark. Ministry of the Environment, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson S.G. 1979. Density and species richness of some forest bird communities in South Sweden. Oikos 33: 392–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck K.M. 1989. Tree species preferences shown by foraging birds in forest plantations in Northern England. Biological Conservation 48: 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulsen B.O. and Krabbe N. 1997. Avian rarity in ten cloud-forest communities in the Andes of Ecuador: implications for conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 1365–1375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulsen B.O. and Krabbe N. 1998. Avifaunal diversity of five high-altitude cloud forests on the Andean western slope of Ecuador: testing a rapid assessment method. Journal of Biogeography 25: 83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice J., Ohmart R.D. and Anderson B.W. 1983. Habitat selection attributes of an avian community: a discriminant analysis investigation. Ecological Monographs 53: 263–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risberg B. 1997. Revirtathet och artdiversitet bland fåglar håckande i Ångermanlandsk skogsmark. Ornis Svecica 7: 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotenberry J.T. 1985. The role of habitat in avian community composition: physiognomy or floristics? Oecologia 67: 213–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Røv N. 1975. Breeding bird community structure and species diversity along an ecological gradient in deciduous forest in western Norway. Ornis Scandinavica 6: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvig J. 1991. Fuglelivet i 3 jyske skove: Høstemark Hov og Nedergaard Skove — skovstrukturer og ynglefuglebestande. Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser, Kalø, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sändstrom U. 1992. Cavities in trees: their occurrence, formation and importance for hole-nesting birds in relation to silvicultural practise. Report 23. Institut for Viltekologi, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, Uppsala, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS 1989–1996. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6.12. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherzinger W. 1998. Sind Spechte 'gute' Indikatoren der ökologischen situation von Waldern? Vogelwelt 119: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmiegelow F.K.A., Machtans C.S. and Hannon S.J. 1997. Are boreal birds resilient to forest fragmentation? An experimental study of short-term community responses. Ecology 78: 1914–1932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skov-og Naturstyrelsen 1994. Strategi for bæredygtig skovdrift. Betænkning nr. 1267. Miljøministeriet, Copenhagen.

  • Stolt B.E. 1972. On the occurrence of the nightjar. Vår Fågelvarld 31: 111–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson S. 1978. Storlek och isolering hos naturreservat: synspunkter på tillämpning av ekologisk teori. Anser 3: 225–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson I.D., Hogan H.A. and Montevecchi W.A. 1999. Avian communities of mature Balsam Fir forests in New Foundland: age-dependence and implications for timber harvesting. Condor 101: 311–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjernberg M. 1983. Habitat and nest site features of Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos (L.), in Sweden. Swedish Wildlife Research 12: 131–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomiałojć L. and Wesołowski T. 1990. Bird communities of the primaeval temperate forest of Białowieza, Poland. In: Keast A. (ed.), Biogeography and Ecology of Forest Bird Communities. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, the Netherlands, pp. 141–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twedt D.J., Wilson R.R., Henne-Kerr J.L. and Hamilton R.B. 1999. Impact of forest type and management strategy on avian densities in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 123: 261–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valkama J. and Lehikoinen E. 1994. Present occurrence and habitat selection of the Wood lark Lullula arborea in SW Finland. Ornis Fennica 71: 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter H. 1985. Vegetation of the Earth. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh C.J.E. and Healy W.M. 1993. Effects of even-aged timber management on bird species diversity and composition in northern hardwoods of New Hampshire. Wildlife Society Bulletin 21: 143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson M.F. 1974. Avian community organization and habitat structure. Ecology 55: 1017–1029.

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF 1999. The European Forest Scorecards 2000. WWF, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poulsen, B.O. Avian richness and abundance in temperate Danish forests: tree variables important to birds and their conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 11, 1551–1566 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016839518172

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016839518172

Navigation