Skip to main content
Log in

Conformation and electrostatic potential surfaces of opiates: Relationship to µ- and λ-site binding

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Molecular mechanics energy minimization and electrostatic potential surface calculations have been used to examine a series of opioid compounds that interact with the µ opoid receptor and a recently discovered high-affinity naloxone binding site (the λ site). The compounds studied include members of the morphinan, 4,5-epoxymorphinan, and benzomorphan families. All compounds bind with a high affinity at the µ opiate receptor site, but only the 4,5-epoxymorphinans bind tightly at the λ site. The results suggest that conformational differences in the various families do not satisfactorily explain the observed trends in binding affinity at the λ site. However, electrostatic potential surfaces for a representative subset of these opioids exhibit patterns that allow us to classify members as high-affinity or low-affinity λ-site ligands in good agreement with the experimental results. The procedures used in this work may be useful in defining characteristics that impart selectivity for opiate receptor subtypes such as the µ, δ, and κ receptors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. G. Wipff, J. Blaney, P. Weiner, A. Dearing, and P. A. Kollman. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105:997–1005 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. M. Blaney et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104:6424–6434 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. P. Lybrand, S. C. Brown, R. H. Schafer, and P. A. Kollman. Submitted for publication (1985).

  4. K. J. Miller, R. Brudzinsky, and S. Hall. Biopolymers 19:2091–2121 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. R. Pack and G. H. Loew. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 519:163–172 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Hansch, R. Li, J. M. Blaney, and R. Langridge. J. Med. Chem. 25:777–784 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Froimowitz, P. Salva, G. J. Hite, G. Gianutsos, P. Suzdak, and R. Heyman. J. Comput. Chem. 5:291–301 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. E. Klunk, B. L. Kalman, J. A. Ferrendelli, and D. F. Covey. Mol. Pharmacol. 23:511–518 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Humblet and G. R. Marshall. Drug Dev. Res. 1:409–434 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. K. Burt, G. H. Loew, and G. M. Hashimoto. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 367:219–239 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Weinstein, R. Osman, J. P. Green, and S. Topiol. In P. Politzer and D. G. Truhlar (eds.), Chem. Appl. At. Mol. Electrostat. Potentials, Proc. Symp. Role Electrostat. Potentials Chem., 1981, pp. 309–334.

  12. M. Froimowitz. J. Med. Chem. 25:1127–1133 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Weiner, J. Blaney, R. Langridge, R. Schaefer, and P. Kollman. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79:3754–3758 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Grevel and W. Sadée. Science 221:1198–1201 (1983); V. C. Yu, A. E. Jacobson, K. C. Rice, and W. Sadée. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 101:161–162 (1984); J. Grevel, V. C. Yu, and W. Sadée. J. Neurochem. 44:1647–1656 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. C. Perry and W. Sadée. Abstract, Int. Narcotics Res. Conf., North Falmouth, Mass. (1985).

  16. P. Weiner and P. A. Kollman. J. Comput. Chem. 2:287–303 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  17. N. L. Allinger and Y. H. Yun. User's Manual for MM2 and MM2P (1980).

  18. A. Hopfinger. Conformational Properties of Macromolecules, Academic Press, New York, 1973, pp 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  19. I. L. Karle. Acta Cryst. B30:1682–1686 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. J. Sime, M. Dobler, and R. L. Sime. Acta Cryst. B32:2937–2940 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Canfield, J. Barrick, and B. C. Giessen. Acta Cryst. B35:2806–2809 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  22. T. G. Cochran and J. E. Abola. Acta Cryst. B31:919–921 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  23. I. L. Karle, R. D. Gilardi, A. V. Fratini, and J. Karle. Acta Cryst. B25:1469–1479 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  24. L. Gallo, C. Huang, and T. Ferrin. UCSF, MIDAS Molecular Interactive Display and Simulation, University of California, San Francisco.

  25. M. Connolly. QCPE Bull. 1:75–76 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  26. D. S. Fries and P. S. Portoghese. J. Med. Chem. 19:1155–1158 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. E. Jacobson. In L. S. Harris (ed.), Problems of Drug Dependence, NIDA Research Monograph 43, 1982, pp. 389–398.

  28. K.-J. Chang, E. Hazum, and P. Cuatrecasas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:4469–4473 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  29. E. A. Barnard and C. Demoliou-Mason. Br. Med. Bull. 39:37–45 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  30. P. L. Wood, S. E. Charleson, D. Lane, and R. L. Hudgin. Neuropharmacology 20:1215–1220 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  31. S. H. Snyder, C. B. Pert, and G. W. Pasternak. Ann. Intern. Med. 81:534–540 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  32. P. L. Wood, C. Pilapil, M. Thakur, and J. W. Richard. Pharm. Res. 1:46–48 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  33. C. B. Nash and R. W. Caldwell. FACEB Abstract 3987 (1984).

  34. E. Freye, E. Hartung, and G. K. Schenk. Pharmacology 26:110–116 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  35. E. F. Hahn, M. Carroll-Buatti, and G. W. Pasternak. J. Neurosci. 2:572–576 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lybrand, T.P., Kollman, P.A., Yu, V.C. et al. Conformation and electrostatic potential surfaces of opiates: Relationship to µ- and λ-site binding. Pharm Res 3, 218–224 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016338730077

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016338730077

Navigation