Skip to main content
Log in

The Holiness of Yiddish: Who Says Yiddish is Holy and Why?

  • Published:
Language Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The pace of sanctifying profane vernaculars is speeding up and the process is spreading outside of its European primary base. The sanctification of Yiddish as revealed in writing about the language suggests a number of distinctions within sanctity as well as crucial associations with special individuals, literary works, kinship relationships and heightened suffering which are tied to ascriptions of sanctity, by secular as well as religious spokespersons. However, two profiles emerge,which differ in details which are highly revealing of the bases upon which Jewish secularists and religionists ascribe sanctity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bik, Yankev Shmuel ([1807] 1833). In defense of Mendl Lefin. Kerem Khemed, 1, 96–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile ([1912 French] 1915). Elementary forms of the religious life. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faynberg, Leyb ([1954] 1975). Mizmer shir lemame-yidish. Reprinted in Sh. Rollansky (Ed), Fun revolutsye tsu tshuve: Musterverk fun der yidisher literature, Vol. 64 (pp. 141–142). Buenos Aires: Ateneo Literario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, Joshua A. (1972). Language and nationalism. Boston: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, Joshua A. (1991). Yiddish: Turning to life. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, Joshua A. (1997). In praise of the beloved language. Berlin: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glinert, Lewis H. & Shilhav, Yoseph (1991). Holy land, holy language: A study of an Ultraorthodox Jewish ideology. Language in Society, 20, 59–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glinert, Lewis H. (1999). We never changed our language: Attitudes toward Yiddish acquisition among Hasidic educators in Britain. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 138, 31–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, Samuel C. (1989). Cosmopolitans and parochials: Modern Orthodox Jews in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, Samuel C. (1992). Defenders of the faith: Inside Ultra-Orthodox Jewry. New York: Schocken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyesin, Avrohom ([1922] 1967). Der nes. Reprinted in Sh. Rollanski (Ed), Yidish in lid: Musterverk fun der yidisher literatur, Vol. 33 (pp. 57–59). Buenos Aires: Ateneo Literario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, Rudolf (1917). Das Heilige. Munchen: C. H. Beck. [The Idea of the Holy. NewYork: Oxford University Press].

    Google Scholar 

  • Roback, A.A. (1958). Yidish-koydesh. In Di Imperye Yidish (pp. 107–110). Mexico City: Mendleson Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Sore (Di sulitser rebitsin) (1992). Ascend higher: Speak mame-loshn. Dos yidishe vort, 52.

  • Sawyer, J.F.A. & Simpson, J.M.Y. (2001). Language and religion. London: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneerson, Menakhem-Mendl ([1981] 1991). Hoysofe, Bs'd. Misikhes shel parshe yisro, htshm'a. In Lekutey sikhes al parshiyos hashavue (pp. 10–15). New York: Likutey Sikhes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenirer, Sore (1931). Yidishkeyt un yidish. Beys-yankev, 8, 71–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloveitchik, Joseph (1961). Vegn yidish. Der tog, February 24, 4.

  • Steinschnider, Moritz (1903). Die kanoinischen Zahlen 70–73. Zeitschrift der deutschen Morgenlandischen Gesellschaft, 57, 479–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaynraykh, Maks (Max Weinreich) 1974. Di geshikhte fun der yidisher shprakh, 4 volumes. New York: YIVO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fishman, J.A. The Holiness of Yiddish: Who Says Yiddish is Holy and Why?. Language Policy 1, 123–141 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016181810717

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016181810717

Navigation