Abstract
This article examines the attitudes of prospective Kazakhstani parents towards the language in which their children would be raised, based on a survey of 857 Kazakhstani college students. “Mankurtism” is the russification of the elite of non-Russian nationalities. This article examines linguistic mankurtism in light of one goal of Kazakhstani language policy, that all citizens master Kazakh. Results indicating the desire to raise children in Kazakh include male gender, rural residence, and Kazakh as maternal language. The gender and residence results may indicate that urbanites, in particular young couples, will demonstrate mankurtism. Given the primacy accorded mother tongue, the relative disinclination among young Kazakh women to raise their prospective children in Kazakh,which parallels patterns of language choice among women in minority language communities in Austria, Brittany, and East Sutherland,poses a challenge to the spread of Kazakh.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aitmatov, Chingiz (1983). The day lasts more than a hundred years. Trans. Katerina Clark. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Arenov, Muram & Kalmykov, Sergej (1997). Sovremennaja jazykovaja situacija v respublike Kazaxstan, po rezul'tatam sociologièeskogo issledovanija [The current language situation in the Republic of Kazakhstan-results of a sociological research project]. Sajasat (January), 21–30; (February), 29–34.
Broeder, Peter & Extra, Guus (1997). Minority groups and minority languages in the Netherlands: Empirical facts and educational policy. In Theo Bongaerts & Kees de Bot (Eds), Perspectives on foreign-language policy: Studies in honour of Theo van Els (pp. 157–179). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Constantinidou, Evi (1994). The ‘death’ of East Sutherland Gaelic: Death by women? In Pauline Burton, Ketaki Dyson & Shirley Ardener (Eds), Bilingual women. Anthropological approaches to second-language use (pp. 111–127). Oxford/Providence: Berg.
Davé, Bhavna (1996). National revival in Kazakhstan: Language shift and identity change. Post-Soviet Affairs, 12(1), 51–72.
Davé, Bhavna (1997). Politics of language revival: National identity and state building in Kazakhstan. Unpublished Dissertation. Syracuse: Syracuse University.
Dorian, Nancy (1987). The value of language maintenance efforts which are unlikely to succeed. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 68, 57–68.
Fishman, Joshua (1966). Language loyalty in the united states: The maintenance and perpetuation of non-English mother tongues by American ethnic and religious groups. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
Fishman, Joshua (1991). Reversing language shift: Theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Fishman, Joshua (2001). Why is it so hard to save a threatened language? In Joshua Fishman (Ed), Can threatened languages be saved? (pp. 1–22). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Gal, Susan (1978). Peasant men don't get wives: Language and sex roles in a bilingual community. Language in Society, 7, 1–17.
Grimes, Barbara (Ed) (2000). Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 14th edn. Dallas, Texas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
Haarman, Harald & Holman, Eugene (1997). Acculturation and communicative ability among former Soviet nationalities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 17, 113–137.
Kopylenko, Mosei (1997). Gosudarstvennyj jazyk i oficial'nyj jazyk: razgranièenije ponjatija, [The state language and the official Language: A differential definition]. Sajasat (May), 37–39.
Kreindler, Isabelle (1997). Multilingualism in the successor states of the Soviet Union. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 17, 91–112.
Laitin, David (1998). Identity in formation: The Russian-speaking populations in the near abroad. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
McDonald, Maryon (1994). Women and linguistic innovation in Brittany. In Pauline Burton, Ketaki Dyson & Shirley Ardener (Eds), Bilingual women. Anthropological approaches to second-language use (pp. 85–110). Oxford/Providence: Berg.
Oud de Glas, Maria (1979). Les besions langagiers aux Pays-Bas, compte rendu d'un projet des recherches. Étude de linguistique appliquée, 3, 86–94.
Šajmedrenov, E., Èbilova, G., Matyžanov, K., Orazov, N. & Tujaxbaev, T. (1999). Jazykovaja politika v Respublike Kazaxstan [Language policy in the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Astana, Kazakhstan: Ministry of Culture and Information.
Shohamy, Elana (1997). Attitudes, stereotypes, and priorities of different languages: The case of Israel. National Foreign Language Center Policy Seminar, Washington DC, October 8.
Shohamy, Elana & Donista-Schmidt, Smadar (1998). Jews vs. Arabs: Language attitudes and stereotypes. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University, the Tami Steinmetz Center for Peace Research.
Sulejmenova, Èleonora (1995). Jazykovaja politika v Kazaxstane (1921–1990 gody). Sbornik dokumentov [Language policy in Kazakhstan (1921–1990). A reader]. Almaty, Kazakhstan: Kazakh University.
Spolsky, Bernard & Shohamy, Elana (1999). The dynamics of Israeli language policy, NFLC Reports. Washington, DC: The National Foreign Language Center.
Tabyshalieva, Anara (1999). The challenge of regional cooperation in Central Asia: Preventing ethnic conflict in the Ferghana Valley. In Peaceworks 28.Washington: United States Institute of Peace.
Weber, Eugen (1977). Peasants into Frenchmen. London: Chatto and Windus.
Weltens, Bert & de Bot, Kees (1995). Is Dutch just another Berber? An investigation into the language preferences of immigrants in the Netherlands. Language, Culture, and Curriculum, 8(2), 133–140.
Williams, Colin (1997). Territory, identity, and language. In Michael Keating & John Laughlin (Eds), The political economy of regionalism (pp. 112–138). New York: Frank Cass.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rivers, W.P. Attitudes towards Incipient Mankurtism among Kazakhstani College Students. Language Policy 1, 159–174 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016167118081
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016167118081