Abstract
What is the slope of a(linear) function? Due to the ubiquitous use of mathematical software, this seemingly simple question is shown to lead to some subtle issues that are not usually addressed in the school curriculum. In particular, we present evidence that there exists much confusion regarding the connection between the algebraic and geometric aspects of slope, scale and angle. The confusion arises when some common but undeclared default assumptions, concerning the isomorphism between the algebraic and geometric systems, are undermined. The participants in the study were 11th-grade students, prospective and in-service secondary mathematics teachers, mathematics educators and mathematicians — a total of 124 people. All participants responded to a simple but non-standard task, concerning the behavior of slope under a non-homogeneous change of scale. Analysis of the responses reveals two main approaches, which we have termed ‘analytic’ and ‘visual’, as well as some combinations of the two.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Clement, J.: 1989, 'The concept of variation and misconception in Cartesian graphing', FOCUS on Learning Problems in Mathematics 11(2), 77–87.
Demana, F. and Waits, B.K.: 1988, 'Pitfalls in graphical computation, or why a single graph isn't enough', College Mathematics Journal 19(2), 177–183.
Goldenberg, P.E.: 1988, 'Mathematics, metaphors and human factors: Technical and pedagogical challenges in the educational use of graphical representation of functions', Journal of Mathematical Behavior 7(2), 135–173.
Freudenthal, H.: 1983, Didactical Phenomenology of Mathematical Structures, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.
Hillel, J., Lee, L., Laborde, C. and Linchevski, L.: 1992, 'Basic functions through the lens of computer algebra systems', Journal of Mathematical Behavior 11, 119–158.
Kerslake, D.: 1981, 'Graphs', in K. Hart (ed.), Children's Understanding of Mathematics: 11-16, John Murray, London, pp. 120–136.
Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O. and Stein, M.K.: 1990, 'Functions, graphs and graphing: Tasks, learning and teaching', Review of Educational Research 60(1), 1–64.
Ma, L.: 1999, Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics, LEA, New York.
Nemirovsky, R.: 1992, Students' Tendency to Assume Resemblences between a Function and its Derivative, Working paper 2-92, TERC Communications.
Nemirovsky, R.: 1997, 'On mathematical visualization and the place where we live', Educational Studies in Mathematics 33, 99–131.
Pimm, D.: 1987, Speaking Mathematically - Communications in Mathematics Classrooms, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
Pimm, D.: 1995, Symbols and Meaning in School Mathematics, Routledge, London.
Rasslan, S. and Vinner, S.: 1995, 'The graphical, the algebraical and their relation - The notion of slope', in L. Meira and D. Carraher (eds.), Proceedings of the 19 th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 2, Recife, Brazil, pp. 264–271.
Schoenfeld, A.H., Smith, J.P. and Arcavi, A.: 1993, 'Learning: The microgenetic analysis of one student's evolving understanding of a complex subject matter domain', in R. Glaser (ed.), Advances in Instructional Psychology: Vol. 4, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 55–175.
Sela, H.: 2000, Changing the Scale on the Axes as a Springboard to Rethinking the Notion of Slope, Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, Technion, Haifa, Israel (in Hebrew).
Yerushalmy, M.: 1991, 'students' perceptions of aspects of algebraic function using multiple representation software', Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 7, 42–57.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zaslavsky, O., Sela, H. & Leron, U. Being sloppy about slope: The effect of changing the scale. Educational Studies in Mathematics 49, 119–140 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016093305002
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016093305002