Skip to main content
Log in

Physiological root responses of iron deficiency susceptible and tolerant tomato genotypes and their reciprocal F1 hybrids

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By using two tomato genotypes line 227/1 (Fe chlorosis susceptible) and Roza (Fe chlorosis tolerant) and their reciprocal F1hybrid, some root morphological changes, pH changes of nutrient solution, reduction capacity of FeIII and uptake and root-to-shoot translocation of 59Fe were studied under controlled environmental conditions in nutrient solution with 3 different Fe supplies as Fe EDDHA (i.e., 10−7 M, severe Fe deficiency; 10−6 M, intermediate Fe deficiency; 10−4 M, adequate Fe supply). Tolerant parent `Roza' was less affected by low Fe supply than susceptible parent `line 227/1' as judged from the severity of leaf chlorosis. Under both Fe deficient conditions there were no differences between the reciprocal hybrids concerning the appearance of chlorosis. Under intermediate Fe deficiency, reciprocal F1 hybrids (`line 227/1 × Roza' and `Roza × line' 227/1) showed an intermediate chlorosis between tolerant and susceptible parents. However, under severe Fe deficiency the reciprocal hybrids were more chlorotic than the tolerant parent irrespective of which parent was the cytoplasm contributor. A decreased Fe supply during preculture enhanced FeIII reduction capacities of the parents and reciprocal hybrids. Differences in the tolerance to Fe deficiency always were better correlated with FeIII reduction capacity of the genotypes than the Fe deficiency-induced release of H+ ions. Under both Fe deficient conditions the tolerant parent Roza had a much higher FeIII reduction capacity than the susceptible parent line 227/1. The reduction capacity of the hybrids `Roza × line 227/1' was very similar to the capacity of the parent Roza, but higher than the capacity of the hybrids `line 227/1×Roza' at both Fe-deficient conditions. Under both Fe deficient conditions tolerant parent had higher number of lateral roots than the susceptible parent. Among the reciprocal hybrids `Roza × line 227/1' possessed more lateral roots than the `line 227/1 × Roza' under both Fe deficient conditions. Low Fe nutritional status resulted in marked increase in root uptake of 59Fe. At adequate Fe supply, reciprocal hybrids and their parents did not differ in uptake and root-to-shoot translocation of Fe. However, under Fe-deficient conditions uptake and root-to-shoot translocation of 59Fe were significantly higher in the Fe chlorosis tolerant than the susceptible parent. Based on the reduction capacity of FeIII and uptake and root-to-shoot translocation of Fe, the F1 hybrids obtained from the cross in which the maternal genotype was Roza appeared to be more tolerant than when the maternal genotype was the susceptible line 227/1. Uptake and translocation ratio of the F1 hybrids obtained from `Roza × line 227/1' were similar to those of the parent Roza, but higher than the F1 hybrids obtained from `line 227/1 × Roza', particularly under intermediate Fe deficiency. The results indicate that FeIII reduction show a better relationship to Fe efficiency than Fe deficiency induced release of H+ ions. The inheritance of Fe deficiency tolerance of Roza seems not to be simple monogenic. It might be characterised by both, nuclear and extranuclear heredity. The intermediate responses of the reciprocal hybrids of the `line 227/1 × Roza' indicates that the Fe deficiency tolerance character of Roza is transferable by nuclear heredity. The better responses of the hybrids of `Roza × line 227/1' than the hybrids of `line 227/1 × Roza' may be due to maternal transmission from the parent Roza besides the nuclear transmission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bavaresco L, Fregoni M and Fraschini P 1991 Investigations on iron uptake and reduction by excised roots of different grapevine rootstocks and a V. Vinifera cultivar. Plant Soil 130, 109-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bienfait H F, Van den Briel W and Mesland-Mul N T T 1985 Free space iron pools in roots. Germination and mobilizaiton. Plant Physiol. 78, 596-600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bienfait H F 1989 Preventation of stress in iron metabolism of plants. Acta Bot. Neerl. 38, 105-129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown J C, Chaney R L and Ambler J E 1971 A new tomato mutant inefficient in the transport of iron. Physiol. Plant. 25, 48-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown J C and Wann V 1982 Breeding for Fe efficiency: use of indicator plants. J. Plant Nutr. 5, 623-635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown J C and Ambler I E 1974 Iron stress response in tomato. Physiol. Plant. 31, 221-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaney R L 1988 Recent progress and needed research in plant Fe nutrition. J. Plant Nutr. 11, 1589-1603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaney R L, Brown L C and Tiffin J C 1972 Obligatory reduction of ferric chelates in iron uptake by soybeans. Plant Physiol. 50, 208-213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cianzio S R 1999 Breeding crops for improved nutrient efficiency: soybean and wheat as case studies. In Mineral Nutrition of Crops: Fundamental Mechanisms and Implications. Ed. Zdenko Rengel. pp 267-287. Food Products Press, an imprint of The Haworth Press, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinelli F and Viti R 1995 Practical use of root cation exchange capacity as a predictive marker of lime induced chlorosis tolerance in Prunus cersifera L. rootstocks. J. Plant Nutr. 18, 65-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgan H Y, Abak K and Cakmak I 1999 Genotypical Differences in tomatoes for the resistance of Fe deficiency. Proceedings of 3rd National Horticulture Congress 12-16.

  • Ellsworth J W, Jolley V D, Nuland D S and Blaylock A D 1997 Screening for resistance to iron deficiency chlorosis in dry bean using iron reduction capacity. J. Plant Nutr. 20, 1489-1502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth J W, Jolley V D, Nuland D S and Blaylock A D 1998 Use of hydrogen release or a combination of hydrogen release and iron reduction for selecting iron-efficient dry bean and soybean cultivars. J. Plant Nutr. 21, 2639-2651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming A L, Chaney R L and Coulombe B A 1984 Bicarbonate inhibits Fe-stress response and Fe uptake-translocation of chlorosis-susceptible soybean cultivars. J. Plant Nutr. 7, 699-714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han Z H, Shen T, Korcak R F and Baligar V C 1998 Iron absorption by iron efficient and iron inefficient species of apples. J. Plant Nutr. 21, 181-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolley V D, Cook K A, Hansen N C and Stevens W B 1996 Plant physiological responses for genotypic evaluation of iron efficiency in strategy-I and Strategy-II plants-a review. J. Plant Nutr. 19, 1241-1255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolley V D, Fairbanks D J, Stewens W B, Terry R E and Orf J H 1992 Root iron reduction capacity for genotypic evaluation of iron efficiency in soybean. J Plant Nutr. 15, 1679-1690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H 1995 Function of mineral nutrients: micronutrients. In Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. pp 313-324. Academic press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H and Romheld V 1994 Strategies of plants for acquisition of iron. Plant and soil 165, 261-274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H, Romheld V and Kissel M 1986 Different strategies in higher plants in mobilization and uptake of iron. J. Plant Nutr. 9, 695-713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mengel K 1994 Iron availability in plant tissues-iron chlorosis on calcareous soils. Plant Soil 165, 275-283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolic M and Römheld V 1999 Mechanism of Fe uptake by the leaf symplast: is Fe inactivation in leaf a cause of Fe efficiency chlorosis? Plant Soil 215, 229-237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romera F J, Alcántara E and De la Guardia M D 1991 Characterization of the tolerance to iron chlorosis in different peach rootstocks grown in nutrient solution I. Effect of bicarbonate and phosphate. Plant Soil 130, 115-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Römheld V and Marschner H 1981 Iron deficiency stress induced morphological and physiological changes in root tips of sunflower. Physiol. Plant 53, 357-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Römheld V 2000 The chlorosis paradox: Fe inactivation as a secondary event in chlorotic leaves of grapevine. Plant Soil 23, 1629-1643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vose P B 1982 Iron nutrition in plants: a world overview. J. Plant Nut. 5, 233-249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wann E V and Hills W A 1973 The genetics of boron and iron transport in tomato. J. Heredity 64, 370-371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei L C, Ocumpaugh W R and Loeppert R H 1994 Plant-growth and nutrient-uptake characteristics of Fe-deficiency chlorosis susceptible and resistant subclovers. Plant Soil 165, 235-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei L C, Loeppert R H and Ocumpaugh W R 1997 Iron deficiency stress response in Fe deficiency resistant and susceptible subterranean clover-importance of induced H+ release. J. Exp. Bot. 48, 329-246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch R M, Norwell W A, Schaeffer S S, Shaff J E and Kochian L V 1993 Induction of iron (III) and copper (II) reduction in pea (Pisum sativum L.) roots by Fe and Cu status: does the root-cell plasmalemma Fe(III) chelate reductase perform a general role in regulating cation uptake? Planta 190, 555-561.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Yildiz Dasgan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

H. Yildiz Dasgan, Römheld, V., Cakmak, I. et al. Physiological root responses of iron deficiency susceptible and tolerant tomato genotypes and their reciprocal F1 hybrids. Plant and Soil 241, 97–104 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016060710288

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016060710288

Navigation