Abstract
In spite of its popularity, it has not been possible to vindicate the conventional wisdom that classical mechanics is a limiting case of quantum mechanics. The purpose of the present paper is to offer an alternative formulation of mechanics which provides a continuous transition between quantum and classical mechanics via environment-induced decoherence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
J. von Neumann, Mathemetical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, translated by R. T. Beyer (Princeton University Press, 1955).
E. Joos and H. D. Zeh, “The emergence of classical properties through interaction with the environment,” Z. Phys. B 59, 223 (1985).
W. H. Zurek, “Pointer basis of quantum apparatus: Into what mixture does the wave packet collapse?,” Phys. Rev. D 24, 1516 (1981); “Environment-induced superselection rules,” Phys. Rev. D 26, 1862 (1982).
W. H. Zurek, “Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical,” Phys. Today 44, 36 (October 1991).
D. Bohm and B. J. Hiley, The Undivided Universe (Routledge, Chapman &;;; Hall, 1993).
P. R. Holland, Quantum Theory of Motion (Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 224–229.
P. Ghose and Manoj K. Samal, “Continuous transition between quantum and classical mechanics (II),” following paper.
S. Weinberg, “Precision tests of quantum mechanics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 485 (1989).
N. Gisin, “Weinberg's non-linear quantum mechanics and superluminal communications,” Phys. Lett. A 143, 1 (1990). J. Polchinski, “Weinberg's nonlinear quantum mechanics and the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 397 (1991).
G. C. Ghirardi, A. Rimini, and T. Weber, “Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems,” Phys. Rev. D 34, 470 (1986).
M. Brune, E. Hagley, J. Dreyer, X. Maître, A. Maali, C. Wunderlich, J. M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, “Observing the progressive decoherence of the ‘meter’ in a quantum measurement,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4887 (1996).
P. Ghose, “Relativistic quantum mechanics of spin-0 and spin-1 bosons,” Found. Phys. 26, 1441 (1996). P. Ghose and M. K. Samal. “Lorentz-invariant superluminal tunneling,” Phys. Rev. E 26, 036620 (2001).
N. Kemmer, “The particle aspect of meson theory,” Proc. Roy. Soc. A 173, 91 (1939).
Harish-Chandra, “The correspondence between the particle and the wave aspects of the meson and the photon,” Proc. Roy. Soc. A 186, 502 (1946).
J. A. Wheeler, in Battelle Rencontres, C. M. DeWitt and J. A. Wheeler, eds. (Benjamin, New York, 1968), pp. 242–307. B. S. DeWitt, “Quantum theory of gravity. I. The canonical theory,” Phys. Rev. 160, 1113 (1967).
P. R. Holland, Ref. 6, p. 279.
M. Toda, R. Kubo, and N. Saitô, Statistical Physics I, 2nd ed. (Springer, 1995).
N. D. Mermin, “Extreme quantum entanglement in a superposition of macroscopically distinct states,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1838 (1990). S. M. Roy and V. Singh, “Tests of signal locality and Einstein–Bell locality for multiparticle systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2761 (1991). N. Gisin and A. Peres, “Maximal violation of Bell's inequality for arbitrarily large spin,” Phys. Lett. A 162, 15 (1992). P. D. Drummond, “Violations of Bell's inequality in cooperative states,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1407 (1993). D. Home and A. S. Majumdar, “Incompatibility between quantum mechanics and classical realism in the ‘strong’ macroscopic limit,” Phys. Rev. A 52, 4959 (1995).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ghose, P. A Continuous Transition Between Quantum and Classical Mechanics. I. Foundations of Physics 32, 871–892 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016055128428
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016055128428