Skip to main content
Log in

Nonlinear Distribution of Atenolol Between Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Long Evans rats were given atenolol doses ranging from 0.27 to 5.4 mg/kg by intraperitoneal injection. Animals were dosed once every 2 hr for a total of five doses. Atenolol concentrations 1 hr after the last dose were measured from simultaneously obtained plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples. CSF concentrations of atenolol were not proportional to plasma concentrations. The ratio of CSF/plasma concentrations was higher (0.33) at lower plasma atenolol levels (<100 ng/ml) than at the higher atenolol plasma levels (0.05) (P < 0.001). The relationship between plasma and cerebrospinal fluid atenolol concentrations was best described by the sum of a Michaelis–Menten and linear function. Animals were also given atenolol doses and then subjected to global cerebral ischemia. The relationship of atenolol concentrations from plasma and CSF in these animals was linear, with a constant partition ratio of 0.02. Together these data show that atenolol partitioning between plasma and CSF is nonlinear and possibly an energy-dependent process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. P. B. Woods and M. L. Robinson. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 33: 172–173 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. M. Cruickshank, G. Neil-Dwyer, M. Cameron, and J. McAinish. Clin. Sci. 59:453S–455S (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. A. Taylor, D. Jefferson, J. D. Carrol, and P. Turner. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 12:549–559 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Neil-Dwyer, J. Bartlett, J. McAinish, and J. M. Cruickshank. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 11:549–553 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. B. Kostis and R. C. Rosen. Circulation 75:204–212 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. A. Betts and C. Alford. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 28 (Suppl.):65–68 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Van Gelder, M. Alpert, and W. H. Tsui. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 28 (Suppl.):101–103 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. M. Gengo, L. Huntoon, and W. B. McHugh. Arch. Intern. Med. 147:39–43 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. M. Gengo, S. C. Fagan, A. dePadova, J. K. Miller, and P. R. Kinkel. Arch. Intern. Med. (in press) (1988).

  10. O. Lyngstam and L. Ryden. Acta Med. Scand. 209:261–266 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. A. Salem and D. G. McDivitt. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 33:52–57 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. N. Middlemis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 120:51–56 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. F. Morgan and T. W. Stone. Neurosci. Lett. 29:159–162 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. M. Pardridge, R. Sakiyama, and G. Fierer. Am. J. Physiol. 247:R582–R588 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. W. Schneck, J. F. Pritchard, and A. H. Hayes. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 203:621–629 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. A. Pulsinelli and J. B. Brierley. Stroke 10:267–272 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  17. F. M. Gengo, M. A. Ziemniak, W. R. Kinkel, and W. B. McHugh. J. Pharm. Sci. 73 (7):961–963 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. Lemmer, K. Bathe, P. H. Lang, G. Neumann, and H. Winkler. J. Am. Coll. Toxicol. 2 (6):347–358 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  19. L. Edvinsson. In F. Clifoford Rose (eds.), Advances in Headache Research, John Libbey & Co. Ltd., 1987.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gengo, F.M., Pagan, S.C., Hopkins, L.N. et al. Nonlinear Distribution of Atenolol Between Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid. Pharm Res 6, 248–251 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015973719096

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015973719096

Navigation