Skip to main content
Log in

Optimized Inhalation Aerosols. I. The Effects of Spherical Baffle Size and Position upon the Output of Several Pressurized Nonaqueous Suspension Formulations

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Baffles contained in conventional actuators may be a convenient alternative to some of the extension devices used presently with metered-dose inhalers (MDIs). Actuators were modified to determine whether baffles could be used to decrease the output of large “nonrespirable” droplets. These actuators were tested using a series of nonaqueous suspension aerosols containing 0.1 to 2.0% micronized disodium fluorescein (DF) as the model drug, stabilized by sorbitan trioleate in a constant blend of fluorocarbons 11, 12, and 114. A 25-µl metering volume was used throughout. Aerosol output was characterized by cascade impaction. Baffle size and position had pronounced effects on actuator retention and aerosol output. Increasing baffle size resulted in increased retention in the actuator. The total output of the MDI in the “respirable” range (aerodynamic diameter, D ae, <5.5 µm) was greater in the unbaffled actuator than in all baffled actuators. However, all baffles increased the respirable fraction (DF with D ae <5.5 µm: total DF leaving the actuator), R, when compared to their unbaffled controls. For example, for a 0.1% DF, 0.14% surfactant formulation, R was increased from 0.40 (unbaffled) to 0.71 by incorporation of a 0.6-cm-diameter sphere 1.3 cm from the jet of the actuator. In these cases, aerosol segregation occurred due to droplet inertia in the high velocity gas flows. Increasing the respirable fraction at the expense of the total respirable output may obviate undesirable clinical effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. P. R. Byron. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 12:993–1015 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. P. Newman. Deposition and Effects of Inhalation Aerosols, Astra Pharmaceuticals, Lund, 1983, pp. 66–72.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. R. Byron. Pharm. Tech. 11:42–56 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. R. Byron. J. Pharm. Sci. 75:433–438 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. J. Hickey and P. R. Byron. J. Pharm. Sci. 76:338–340 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. P. Newman. In S. W. Clarke and D. Pavia (eds.), Aerosols and the Lung: Clinical and Experimental Aspects, Butterworths, London, 1984, pp. 197–224.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. N. Dalby and P. R. Byron. Pharm. Res. 5:36–39 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. J. Hickey, R. N. Dalby, and P. R. Byron. Int. J. Pharm. 40:267–270 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. P. Polli, W. M. Grim, F. A. Bacher, and M. H. Yunker. J. Pharm. Sci. 58:484–486 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  10. I. Gonda. Int. J. Pharm. 27:99–116 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. Dombrowski and G. Munday. In N. Blakebrough (ed.), Biochemical and Biological Engineering Sciences, Academic Press, London, 1968, pp. 209–320.

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. R. Lane. Ind. Eng. Chem 43:1312–1317 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. D. Gordon. J. Appl. Phys. 30:1759–1761 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. J. Zajac. Droplet Breakup in Accelerating Gas Flows, NASA CR-134479, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA., 1973, pp. 1–59.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. M. Clay, D. Pavia, S. P. Newman, and S. W. Clarke. Thorax 38:755–759 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. V. Groom. Ph.D. thesis, University of Aston, Birmingham, U.K., 1981.

  17. S. V. Hering, S. K. Friedlander, J. J. Collins, and L. W. Richards. Env. Sci. Tech. 13:184–188 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. W. Rance. J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 25:545–561 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. P. Newman, D. Pavia, F. Moren, N. F. Sheahan, and S. W. Clarke. Thorax 36:52–55 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Konig. Chest 88:276–284 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Byron, P.R., Dalby, R.N. & Hickey, A.J. Optimized Inhalation Aerosols. I. The Effects of Spherical Baffle Size and Position upon the Output of Several Pressurized Nonaqueous Suspension Formulations. Pharm Res 6, 225–229 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015913500441

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015913500441

Navigation