Abstract
An expression of community social psychology based on the need to transform social reality, and to consider people as the constructors of that reality, is examined from an epistemological point of view. Dualism, the position considering that object and subject are separate entities, and monism, the perspective stating that there is only one substance, are discussed. The consequences of both conceptions for community social psychology, and their incompatibility, as well as the notions of reality and truth are analyzed. That analysis deals with the problems of defining reality, of separating subject and object of knowledge, of language's role, and of relativism and truth. Finally, a constructionist view of monism based on relatedness, and action, is proposed, stating the mutually influencing union of subject and object in the construction of reality.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Augustine (ca. 400/1952). Confessions (pp. 1-25). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Baudrillard, J. (1991). Las estrategias fatales [Fatal strategies]. Barcelona, Spain: Anagrama.
Bhaskar, R. (1989). Reclaiming reality: A critical introduction to contemporary philosophy. London: Verso.
Derrida, J. (1967). De la grammatologie [On grammatology]. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
Freire, P. (1964). La educación como práctica de libertad [Education as the practice of freedom]. Mexico: Siglo XXI.
Ibáñez, T. (1993). Naturaleza y efectos del conocimiento psicológico [Nature and effects of psychological knowledge]. Psicología, XIX(12), 92-101.
Ibáñez, T. (1994). La construcción del conocimiento desde una perspectiva socioconstruccionista [The construction of knowledge from a socio-constructionist perspective]. In M. Montero (Ed.), Conocimiento, realidad e ideología [Knowledge, reality and ideology] (Fascículo No 6, pp. 37-48). Caracas, Venezuela: AVEPSO.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Le visible et l'invisible [The visible and the invisible]. Paris: Gallimard.
Montero, M. (1984). La psicología comunitaria: Orígenes, principios y fundamentos teíricos [Community Psychology. Origins, principles and theoretical foundations]. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 16(3), 387-400.
Montero, M. (1994). Investigación-acción participante. La unión entre conocimiento popular y conocimiento científico [Participatory action-research. The union between ordinary and scientific knowledege]. Revista de Psicología, VI(1), 31-45.
Much, N. (1992). The analysis of discourse as methodology for a semiotic psychology. American Behavioral Scientist, 36(1), 52-72.
Parker, I. (1992). Discourse dynamics [Critical analysis for social and individual psychology]. London: Sage.
Putnam, H. (1991). El significado y las ciencias morales [Meaning and the moral sciences]. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico.
Rappaport, J. (1978). Community psychology: Values, research and action. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Ricoeur, P. (1986). Du texte à l'action (Essays d'hermeneutique II ) [From text to action (Hermeneutical Essays)]. Paris: Seuil/Esprit.
Serrano-García, I., & Irizarry, A. (1979). Intervención en la investigación [Intervention in research]. Boletín de la AVEPSO, II(3), 6-21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Montero, M. On the Construction of Reality and Truth. Towards an Epistemology of Community Social Psychology. Am J Community Psychol 30, 571–584 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015864103005
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015864103005