Skip to main content
Log in

Adenosine myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomographic stress testing 24–72 h after uncomplicated myocardial infarction

  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Safety of performing adenosine myocardial perfusion stress testing as early as 24 h after acute uncomplicated myocardial infarction is not known. We evaluated 31 (14 females and 17 males, average age 72, range 46–89 years) consecutive patients with uncomplicated myocardial infarction, who underwent adenosine myocardial perfusion stress imaging, 24–72 h after infarction for risk stratification. Adenosine was infused at a rate of 140 μg/kg/min for 6 min. Twenty patients were presented with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eleven patients were admitted with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Patients were monitored for signs of complication during and immediately after the stress test. The average time from admission to performance of stress tests was 51 ± 19 h, ranging from the minimum of 24 h to maximum 72 h. No complications related to adenosine infusion were detected. In conclusion, our data suggest that a further large study of early adenosine myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging may be safe in a carefully selected group of patients after uncomplicated myocardial infarction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Braunwald E, Antman EM, RO, Smith SC Jr, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36(3): 970–1062.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Crawford MH, et al. Outcomes in patients with acute non-Q-wave myocardial infarction randomly assigned to an invasive as compared with a conservative management strategy. Veterans Affairs Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies in Hospital (VANQWISH) Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 1998; 338(25): 1785–1792.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cerqueira MD, Verani MS, Iskandrian AS, et al. Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: results from the adenoscan multicenter trial registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23(2): 384–389.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Samuels B, Kiat H, Friedman JD, Berman DS. Adenosine pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion tomographic imaging in patients with significant aortic stenosis. Diagnostic efficacy and comparison of clinical, hemodynamic and electrocardiographic variables with 100 age-matched control subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25(1): 99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mahaffey KW, Puma JA, Granger CB, et al. Adenosine as an adjunct to thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: results of a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial: the acute myocardial infarction study of adenosine (AMISTAD) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34(6): 1711–1720.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Effects of tissue plasminogen activator and a comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Results of the TIMI IIIB Trial Circulation 1994; 89(4): 1545–1556.

  7. Brown KA, Beller GA, Haber SB, et al. Early dipyridamole (99m) Tc-sestamibi single photon emission computed tomographic imaging 2 to 4 days after an acute myocardial infarction predicts in-hospital and post-discharge cardiac events: comparison with submaximal exercise imaging. Circulation 1999; 100(20): 2060–2066.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Braunwald. Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, 5th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moser GH, Schrader J, Deussen A. Turnover of adenosine in plasma of human and dog blood. Am J Physiol 1989; 256(4 Pt 1): C799–C806.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mahmarian JJ, Pratt CM, Nishimura S, Abreu A, Verani MS. Quantitative adenosine 201Tl single-photon emission computed tomography for the early assessment of patients surviving acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1993; 87(4): 1197–1210.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bouvier F, Hojer J, Hulting J, Ruiz H, Samad B, Jensen-Urstad M. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy single photon emission computer tomography during adenosine stress can be performed safely early on after thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Clin Physiol 1998; 18(2): 97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Heller GV, Brown KA, Landin RJ, Haber SB. Safety of early intravenous dipyridamole technetium 99m sestamibi SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging after uncomplicated first myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1997; 134: 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kulhanek, J., Sorrell, V.L., Ershadi, R.E. et al. Adenosine myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomographic stress testing 24–72 h after uncomplicated myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 18, 269–272 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015525311510

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015525311510

Navigation