Skip to main content
Log in

Biomethanation of plant materials and agricultural residues using dung samples as wild population of microbes and also with isolated methanogens

  • Published:
Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recycling of plant materials and agricultural residues for biomethanation was attempted in vials. The methanogenic activities of certain sewage samples have also been tested. Both sterilized and non-sterilized biomasses were used. Biomethanation was carried out with dung samples (cow, goat, buffalo, piggery wastes and poultry wash) as wild populations of microbes and in combination with other microbial isolates (isolated in the laboratory).

Biomethanation had been observed to be good in most cases and particularly with the sterilized biomass. Mixed inoculum (dung samples and poultry wash) was found to be best for biomethanation. Of the microbe isolates, isolates from buffalo, pig and paper mill wastes appear to be most effective. Pretreated sawdust and rice straw were found to be good subtrates for biomethanation. Of the different plant biomass used Spirogyra (algae), Ipomea and water hyacinth were most effective whereas Jatropa gossypifolia and Parthenium sp. were the least effective. Biomethanation of Spirogyra was carried out both in anoxic and oxic conditions. Though methane production decreased enormously under oxic conditions, definite methane production continued indicating that the biomethanation process is not exclusively anoxic. Similarly, biomethanation of sewage samples from different sewage treatment plants were carried out with and without isolated methanogens and methane production was found to be moderate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bachman, J.S., Petitdemange, E. and Prost C. (1984) Influence of an Enriched Inoculum with Selected Anaerobic Bacteria(cellulolytic or methanogenic) on the Methane Fermentation of Cellulosic Material by a Wild Microbial Population in Anaerobic Digestion and Carbohydrate Hydrolysis of Waste, pp. 235–44. London and New York: Elsevier Applied Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravorty, N., Sarkar, G.M. and Lahiri, S.C. (1996) Competitive biomethanation using substrates in combination and by cross inoculation. The Environmentalist 16, 111–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, N., Sarkar, G.M. and Lahiri, S.C. (2000a) Cellulose degrading capabilities of cellulolyticbacteria isolated from the intestinal fluids of the silver cricket. The Environmentalist 20, 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, N., Sarkar, G.M. and Lahiri, S.C. (2000b) Methane emission from rice paddy soils, aerotolerance of methanogens and global thermal warming. The Environmentalist 20(4), 343–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demuynck, M. and Nyns, E. (1984) Biogas plants in Europe. J. International Solar Energy 2(6), 477–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero, G.L., Ferranti, M.P. and Naveau, H. (ed.) (1984) Anaerobic Digestion and Carbohydrate Hydrolysis of Waste, p.517.London and New York: Elsevier Applied Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, S., Bak, F. and Cornad, R. (1993) Sensitivity of methanogenic bacteriafrom paddy soil to oxygen and desiccation. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 12, 107–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerritse, J.and Gottschal, C.J.(1993) Two-membered mixed cultures of methanogenic and aerobic bacteria in O2-limited chemostats. J. General Microbiology 139, 1853–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, P.N. (1984) Production of biogas from agricultural wastes.In Advance in Agricultural Microbiology (N.S. Subba Rao, ed.) pp.523–48. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, E.C. (1956) Mineral components and ash analysis. In ModernMethods of Plant Analysis (K. Paech and M.V. Tracey, eds.) vol.1; pp. 468–502. Berlin, Gottingen-Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasali, G.B. (1990) Solid-state refuse methanogenic fermentation: Control and promotion by water addition. Letters in Applied Microbiology 11(1), 22–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klass, D.L. and Ghosh, S. (1980) Methane production by anaerobic digestion of water hyacynth (Eichhornia crassipes).Prep. Rap. Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Fuel Chem. 25(4), 221–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, S.C. (1999) Biogas generation: Some salient features. Proc.Renewable Energy Congress, Kalyani University, India, pp. 28–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palz, W., Chartier, P. and Hall D.O. (eds.) (1982) Energyfrom Biomass (1st European Communities Conference) p. 982. London and New York: Applied Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranade, D.R., Meher, K.K. and Gadre, R.V. (1991) Microbial pretreatment of biomass for biogas production. Biovigyanam 17, 61–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranade, D.R., Yeole, T.Y. and Godbole, S.H. (1987) Production of biogas from market wastes. Biomass 13, 147–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strub, A., Chartier, P.and Schlesser, G.(1983) Energy from Biomass (2nd European Communities Conference) p. 1148. London and New York: Applied Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Buren, A. (ed.) (1979) A Chinese Biogas Manual, Popularizing Technology in the Country Side(M.Cook, Translator) pp. 1–135. London: Intermediate Technology Publication Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vlugat, A.J. and Rulkens, W.H. (1984)Biogas production from a domestic waste fraction. In Anaerobic Digestion and Carbohydrate Hydrolysis of Waste, pp. 245–50. London and New York: Elsevier Applied Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vimal, O.P. and Tyagi, P.D. (1984) Energy from Biomass, Part 2, pp. 213–336.New Delhi: Agricole Publishing Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimpenny, J.W.T. and Abdollahi, H. (1991) Growth of mixed cultures of Puracoccusdenitrificans and Desulfovibrio desulfuricans in homogeneous and heterogeneous culture systems. Microbial Ecology 22, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chakraborty, N., Sarkar, G. & Lahiri, S. Biomethanation of plant materials and agricultural residues using dung samples as wild population of microbes and also with isolated methanogens. The Environmentalist 22, 173–182 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015346119325

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015346119325

Navigation