Skip to main content
Log in

Scaling patterns of biomass and soil properties: an empirical analysis

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We argue that studies at multiple scales must necessarilychange the extent of measurements, not just the spacing, in order toeffectivelycapture information regarding processes at multiple scales. We have implementeda multi-scale sampling scheme using transects of 10 cm, 1m, 10 m, 100 m, and 1 km ateach of four sites along an elevational gradient from dry foothills forest toalpine tundra in the Front Range of Colorado; these four sites form anadditional transect of 22 km. Along each of these transects wetookten equally spaced soil cores and measured variables important in determiningboth microbial and plant community structure: soil water content, organicmattercontent, pH, and total soil biomass. With this sampling scheme we are able totreat scale as an independent variable in our analyses, and our data show thatboth particular sites and particular variables can determine whether estimatesof mean values are scale-dependent or not. A geostatistical analysis using allof our data shows common relationships between scales across ecologicallydiverse sites; biomass shows the most complex pattern of distribution acrossscales, as measured by fractal dimension. Our analyses also reveal theinadequacy of several standard geostatistical models when applied to data frommultiple scales of measurement – we recommend the use of the boundedpowerlaw model in such cases. We hypothesize that because biological communitiesmustrespond simultaneously to multiple variables with differing patterns of spatialvariation, the spatial variation of biological communities will be at least ascomplex as the most complex environmental variable at any given site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amarasekare P. 1994. Spatial population structure in the bannertailed kangaroo rat, Dipodomys spectabilis. Oecologia 100: 166-174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett R.J. and Ross D.S. 1988. Colorimetric determination of oxidizable carbon in acid soil solutions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52: 1191-1192.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berntson G.M. and Stoll P. 1997. Correcting for finite spatial scales of self-similarity when calculating the fractal dimensions of real-world structures. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 264: 1531-1537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bian L. and Walsh S.J. 1993. Scale dependencies of vegetation and topography in a mountainous environment of Montana. Prof. Geog. 45: 1-11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosofske K.D., Chen J., Crow T.R. and Saunders S.C. 1999. Vegetation responses to landscape structure at multiple scales across a northern Wisconsin, USA, pine barrens landscape. Plant Ecol. 143: 203-218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrough P.A. 1981. Fractal dimensions of landscapes and other environmental data. Nature 294: 240-242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrough P.A. 1983a. Multiscale sources of spatial variation in soil. I. The application of fractal concepts to nested levels of soil variation. J. Soil Sci. 34: 577-597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough P.A. 1983b. Multiscale sources of spatial variation in soil. II. A non-Brownian fractal model and its application in soil survey. J. Soil Sci. 34: 599-620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns D.M. 1999. Multi-scale analysis of soil nutrients at alpine treeline in Glacier National Park, Montana. Phys. Geog. 20: 256-271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilés, Jean-Pau1 and Pierre Delfiner 1999. Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, Noel, Douglas M. and Hawkins 1980. Robust estimation of the semivariogram: I. Math. Geol. 12: 115-125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinan V.I., Simmons M.A. and Thomas J.M. 1997. A Bayesian test of hierarchy theory: scaling up variability in plant cover from field to remotely sensed data. Lands. Ecol. 12: 273-285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker K.L.M., Boerner R.E.J. and Morris S.J. 1999. Scale-dependent patterns of soil enzyme activity in a forested landscape. Can. J. For. Res. 29: 232-241.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greenland D. 1989. The climate of Niwot Ridge, Front Range, Colorado, U.S.A. Arct. Alp. Res. 21: 380-381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson R.B. and Caldwell M.M. 1993. Geostatistical patterns of soil heterogeneity around individual perennial plants. J. of Ecol. 81: 683-692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotilar N.B. 1996. Scale dependency and the expression of hierarchical structure in Delphinium patches. Vegetatio 127: 117-128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipson D.A., Schmidt S.K. and Monson R.K. 1999. Links between microbial population dynamics and nitrogen availability in an alpine ecosystem. Ecology 80: 1623-1631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loehle C. and Li B. 1996. Statistical properties of ecological and geological fractals. Ecol. Modell. 85: 271-284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark D.M. and Aronson P.B. 1984. Scale-dependent fractal dimensions of topographic surfaces: an empirical investigation, with applications in geomorphology and computer mapping. Math. Geol. 16: 671-683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marr J.W. 1961. Ecosystems of the East Slope of the Front Range in Colorado. University of Colorado Studies Series in Biology. Vol. 8. University of Colorado Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne B.T. 1988. Measuring the fractal geometry of landscapes. Appl. Math. Comp. 27: 67-79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris S.J. 1999. Spatial distribution of fungal and bacterial biomass in souther Ohio hardwood forest soils: fine scale variability and microscale patterns. Soil Biol. Biochem. 31: 1375-1386.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriquez-Iturbe I., Vogel G.K. and Rigon R. 1995. On the spatial organization of soil moisture fields. Geophys. Res. Lett. 22: 2757-2760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers D.L., Millar C.I. and Westfall R.D. 1999. Fine-scale genetic strcture of whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis): associations with watershed and growth form. Evolution 53: 74-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker D.A., Halfpenny J.C., Walker M.D. and Wessman C.A. 1993. Long term studies of snow-vegetation interactions. Bioscience 43: 287-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western A.W. and Blöschl G. 1999. On the spatial scaling of soil moisture. J. Hydrol. 217: 203-224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J., Hammer R.D. and Blanchar R.W. 1995. Microscale pH spatial distribution in the Ap horizon of Mexico silt loam. Soil Sci. 160: 371-375.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yost R.S., Uehara G. and Fox R.L. 1982. Geostatistical analysis of soil chemical properties of large land areas. 1. Semi-semivariograms. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46: 1028-1032.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oline, D.K., Grant, M.C. Scaling patterns of biomass and soil properties: an empirical analysis. Landscape Ecol 17, 13–26 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015276723949

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015276723949

Navigation