Abstract
We argue that studies at multiple scales must necessarilychange the extent of measurements, not just the spacing, in order toeffectivelycapture information regarding processes at multiple scales. We have implementeda multi-scale sampling scheme using transects of 10 cm, 1m, 10 m, 100 m, and 1 km ateach of four sites along an elevational gradient from dry foothills forest toalpine tundra in the Front Range of Colorado; these four sites form anadditional transect of 22 km. Along each of these transects wetookten equally spaced soil cores and measured variables important in determiningboth microbial and plant community structure: soil water content, organicmattercontent, pH, and total soil biomass. With this sampling scheme we are able totreat scale as an independent variable in our analyses, and our data show thatboth particular sites and particular variables can determine whether estimatesof mean values are scale-dependent or not. A geostatistical analysis using allof our data shows common relationships between scales across ecologicallydiverse sites; biomass shows the most complex pattern of distribution acrossscales, as measured by fractal dimension. Our analyses also reveal theinadequacy of several standard geostatistical models when applied to data frommultiple scales of measurement – we recommend the use of the boundedpowerlaw model in such cases. We hypothesize that because biological communitiesmustrespond simultaneously to multiple variables with differing patterns of spatialvariation, the spatial variation of biological communities will be at least ascomplex as the most complex environmental variable at any given site.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amarasekare P. 1994. Spatial population structure in the bannertailed kangaroo rat, Dipodomys spectabilis. Oecologia 100: 166-174.
Bartlett R.J. and Ross D.S. 1988. Colorimetric determination of oxidizable carbon in acid soil solutions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52: 1191-1192.
Berntson G.M. and Stoll P. 1997. Correcting for finite spatial scales of self-similarity when calculating the fractal dimensions of real-world structures. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 264: 1531-1537.
Bian L. and Walsh S.J. 1993. Scale dependencies of vegetation and topography in a mountainous environment of Montana. Prof. Geog. 45: 1-11.
Brosofske K.D., Chen J., Crow T.R. and Saunders S.C. 1999. Vegetation responses to landscape structure at multiple scales across a northern Wisconsin, USA, pine barrens landscape. Plant Ecol. 143: 203-218.
Burrough P.A. 1981. Fractal dimensions of landscapes and other environmental data. Nature 294: 240-242.
Burrough P.A. 1983a. Multiscale sources of spatial variation in soil. I. The application of fractal concepts to nested levels of soil variation. J. Soil Sci. 34: 577-597.
Burrough P.A. 1983b. Multiscale sources of spatial variation in soil. II. A non-Brownian fractal model and its application in soil survey. J. Soil Sci. 34: 599-620.
Cairns D.M. 1999. Multi-scale analysis of soil nutrients at alpine treeline in Glacier National Park, Montana. Phys. Geog. 20: 256-271.
Chilés, Jean-Pau1 and Pierre Delfiner 1999. Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, New York, USA.
Cressie, Noel, Douglas M. and Hawkins 1980. Robust estimation of the semivariogram: I. Math. Geol. 12: 115-125.
Cullinan V.I., Simmons M.A. and Thomas J.M. 1997. A Bayesian test of hierarchy theory: scaling up variability in plant cover from field to remotely sensed data. Lands. Ecol. 12: 273-285.
Decker K.L.M., Boerner R.E.J. and Morris S.J. 1999. Scale-dependent patterns of soil enzyme activity in a forested landscape. Can. J. For. Res. 29: 232-241.
Greenland D. 1989. The climate of Niwot Ridge, Front Range, Colorado, U.S.A. Arct. Alp. Res. 21: 380-381.
Jackson R.B. and Caldwell M.M. 1993. Geostatistical patterns of soil heterogeneity around individual perennial plants. J. of Ecol. 81: 683-692.
Kotilar N.B. 1996. Scale dependency and the expression of hierarchical structure in Delphinium patches. Vegetatio 127: 117-128.
Lipson D.A., Schmidt S.K. and Monson R.K. 1999. Links between microbial population dynamics and nitrogen availability in an alpine ecosystem. Ecology 80: 1623-1631.
Loehle C. and Li B. 1996. Statistical properties of ecological and geological fractals. Ecol. Modell. 85: 271-284.
Mark D.M. and Aronson P.B. 1984. Scale-dependent fractal dimensions of topographic surfaces: an empirical investigation, with applications in geomorphology and computer mapping. Math. Geol. 16: 671-683.
Marr J.W. 1961. Ecosystems of the East Slope of the Front Range in Colorado. University of Colorado Studies Series in Biology. Vol. 8. University of Colorado Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Milne B.T. 1988. Measuring the fractal geometry of landscapes. Appl. Math. Comp. 27: 67-79.
Morris S.J. 1999. Spatial distribution of fungal and bacterial biomass in souther Ohio hardwood forest soils: fine scale variability and microscale patterns. Soil Biol. Biochem. 31: 1375-1386.
Rodriquez-Iturbe I., Vogel G.K. and Rigon R. 1995. On the spatial organization of soil moisture fields. Geophys. Res. Lett. 22: 2757-2760.
Rogers D.L., Millar C.I. and Westfall R.D. 1999. Fine-scale genetic strcture of whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis): associations with watershed and growth form. Evolution 53: 74-90.
Walker D.A., Halfpenny J.C., Walker M.D. and Wessman C.A. 1993. Long term studies of snow-vegetation interactions. Bioscience 43: 287-301.
Western A.W. and Blöschl G. 1999. On the spatial scaling of soil moisture. J. Hydrol. 217: 203-224.
Yang J., Hammer R.D. and Blanchar R.W. 1995. Microscale pH spatial distribution in the Ap horizon of Mexico silt loam. Soil Sci. 160: 371-375.
Yost R.S., Uehara G. and Fox R.L. 1982. Geostatistical analysis of soil chemical properties of large land areas. 1. Semi-semivariograms. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46: 1028-1032.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oline, D.K., Grant, M.C. Scaling patterns of biomass and soil properties: an empirical analysis. Landscape Ecol 17, 13–26 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015276723949
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015276723949