Abstract
I attempted to characterize spatial units of local dynamics and dispersal in banner-tailed kangaroo rats (Dipodomys spectabilis), to determine if spatial structure influenced population dynamics in the way predicted by current metapopulation models. D. spectabilis exhibited a hierarchical spatial structure. “Local populations” that appeared as discrete entities on a scale of kilometers were subdivided into clusters of mounds on a scale of meters. This structure, however, cannot be characyerized in terms of the discrete habitat patches envisioned by the metapopulation models. Occupied areas were statistically distinguishable from the surrounding matrix, but this difference was only quantitative. There were no discrete boundaries between occupied areas and the matrix. Habitat within occupied areas was heterogeneous, and occupied areas in different locations were statistically distinguishable from each other. High heterogeneity within occupied areas, and high contrast among them, make it difficult to define what is a suitable habitat patch for D. spectabilis. On a smaller spatial scale, there was significant aggregation of resident mounds within occupied areas. These aggregations, however, do not correspond to discrete habitat patches. Rather, they appear to result from an interaction between fine-scale habitat heterogeneity and limited dispersal due to natal philopatry and low adult vagility. These complications make it difficult to identify habitat patches independent of the species' distribution. For species like D. spectabilis that are patchily distributed but do not occupy discrete habitat patches, a patch occupancy approach does not seem appropriate for describing spatial structure. Hierarchical spatial structure underscores the need for a framework that incorporates multiple scales of spatial structure, rather than one that pre-imposes a single spatial scale as being important for population dynamics. A framework that (i) considers patchiness as a combination of both habitat heterogeneity, and life-history and behavioral characteristics, and (ii) incorporates hierarchical spatial structure, appears to be the most suitable for conceptualizing spatial dynamics of behaviorally complex vertebrates such as D. spectabilis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bowers MA, Brown JH (1982) Body size and coexistence in desert rodents: chance or community structure? Ecology 63: 391–400
Boyce MS (1992) Population viability analysis. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23: 481–506
Brown JH, Gibson AC (1983) Biogeography. Mosby, St. Louis
Caughley G (1994) Directions in conservation biology. J Anim Ecol 63: 215–244
Davis GJ, Howe RW (1992) Juvenile dispersal limited breeding sites, and the dynamics of metapopulations. Theor Popul Biol 41: 184–207
Doak DF, Mills LS (1994) A useful role for theory in conservation. Ecology 75: 615–626
Doak DF, Marino PC, Kareiva PM (1992) Spatial scale mediates the influence of habitat fragmentation on dispersal success: implications for conservations. Theor Popul Biol 41: 315–336
Gilpin ME (1987) Spatial structure and population vulnerability. In: Soule ME (ed) Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 125–140
Gilpin ME (1991) A spatially structured model for Stephens' kangaroo rat reserve design. In: Report on the reserve design model developed for the long-term habitat conservation plan for the Stephens' kangaroo rat in western Riverside County University of California, San Diego, pp 107–129
Gotelli NJ, Kelly WG (1993) A general model of metapopulation dynamics. Oikos 68: 36–44
Gyllenberg M, Hanski I (1992) Two general metapopulation models and the core-satellite hypothesis. Am Nat 142: 17–41
Hanski I (1982) Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis. Oikos 38: 210–221
Hanski I (1985) Single species spatial dynamics may contribute to long-term rarity and commonness. Ecology 66: 335–343
Hanski I (1991) Single-species metapopulation dynamics: concepts, models and observations. Biol J Linn Soc 42: 17–38
Hanski I (1994a) Patch-occupancy dynamics in fragmented landscapes. Trends Ecol Evol 9: 131–135
Hanski I (1994b) A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. J Anim Ecol 63: 151–162
Hanski I (1994c) Metapopulation dynamics and conservation—a spatially explicit model applied to butterflies. Biol Conserv 68: 167–180
Hanski I, Gilpin ME (1991) Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain. Biol J Linn Soc 42: 3–16
Hanski I, Gyllenberg M (1993) Single-species metapopulation dynamics: a structured model. Theor Popul Biol 42: 35–61
Harrison SP (1989) Long-distance dispersal and colonization in the bay checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas editha bayensis. Ecology 70: 1236–1243
Harrison SP (1991) Local extinction in a metapopulation context: an empirical evaluation. Biol J Linn Soc 42: 73–88
Harrison SP (1993) Metapopulations and conservation. In: Edwards PJ, May RM (eds) Large-scale ecology and conservation biology. Blackwell Scientific Publ. London, pp 111–128
Hassell MP, Comins HN, May RM (1991) Spatial structure and chaos in insect population dynamics. Nature 353: 255–258
Jones WT (1982) Natal nondispersal in kangaroo rats. PhD thesis, Purdue University, Indiana, USA
Jones WT (1986) Survivorship and philopatric and dispersing kangaroo rats (Dipodomys spectabilis). Ecology 67: 202–207
Jones WT (1987) Dispersal patterns in kangaroo rats (Dipodomys spectabilis). In: Chepko-Sade BD, Halpin ZT (eds) Mammalian dispersal patterns: the effect of social structure on population genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 119–127
Jones WT (1988a) Variation in sex ratios of banner-tailed kangaroo rats in relation to population density. J Mammal 69: 303–310
Jones WT (1988b) Density-related changes in survival of philopatric and dispersing kangaroo rats. Ecology 69: 1474–1478
Jones WT, Waser PM, Elliott LF, Link NE and Bush BB (1988) Philopatry, dispersal and habitat saturation in the banner-tailed kangaroo rat, Dipodomys spectabilis. Ecology 69: 1466–1473
Kareiva PM (1986) Patchiness, dispersal and species interactions. In: Diamond J, Case TJ (eds) Community ecology. Harper and Row, New York, pp 192–206
Kareiva PM (1990) Population dynamics in spatially complex environments: theory and data. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 330: 175–190
Kitching R (1971) A simple simulation model of dispersal of animals among units of discrete habitats. Oecologia 7: 95–116
Kotliar NB, Wiens JA (1990) Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure—a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos 59: 253–260
Levins R (1969) Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull Entomol Soc Am 15: 237–240
Levins R (1970) Extinction. In: Gerstenhaber M (ed) Some mathematical problems in biology. American Mathematical Society, Providence, pp 77–107
McKelvey K, Noon BR, Lamberson RH (1992) Conservation planning for species occupying fragmented landscapes: the case of the northern spotted owl. In: Kareiva PM, Kingslover JG, Huey RB (eds) Biotic interactions and global change. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp. 42
Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H (1974) Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New York
Murdoch WM, Briggs CL, Nisbet RM, Gurney WSC, Stewart-Oaten A (1992) Aggregation and stability in metapopulation models. Am Nat 140: 41–58
Murrey JD (1989) Mathematical biology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Pielou EC (1977) Mathematical ecology. Wiley, New York
Pulliam HR (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am Nat 132: 652–661
Pulliam HR, Danielson BJ (1992) Sources, sinks and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics. Am Nat 137: S50-S66
Roos AM, McCauley E, Wilson WG (1991) Mobility versus density-limited predator-prey dynamics on different spatial scales. Proc R Soc Lond B 246: 117–122
Rotenberry JT, Wiens JA (1980) Habitat structure, patchiness, and avian communities in North American steppe vegetation: a multivariate analysis. Ecology 61: 1228–1250
SAS Institute (1990) SAS User's Guide, version 6.03. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. Freeman, New York
Taylor AD (1988) Large-scale spatial structure and population dynamics in arthropod predator-prey systems. Ann Zool Fenn 25: 63–74
Waser PM, Elliott LF (1991) Dispersal and genetic structure in banner-tailed kangaroo rats, Dipodomys spectabilis. Evolution 45: 935–943
Waser PM, Jones WT (1989) Heritability of dispersal in banner-tailed kangaroo rats, Dipodomys spectabilis. Anim Behav 37: 987–991
Waser PM, Jones WT (1991) Survival and reproductive effort in banner-tailed kangaroo rats, D. spectabilis. Ecology 72: 771–777
Winer BJ, Brown DR, Michaels KM (1991) Statistical analysis in experimental design. McGraw-Hill, New York
Wooten JT, Bell DA (1992) A metapopulation model of the peregrine falcon in California: viability and management strategies. Ecol Appl 2: 307–321
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Amarasekare, P. Spatial population structure in the banner-tailed kangaroo rat, Dipodomys spectabilis . Oecologia 100, 166–176 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317143
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317143