Skip to main content
Log in

Tax Structure Turbulence in OECD Countries

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyses whether and to what extent politiciansmanipulate tax structures strategically in order to winelections or for ideological purposes. We introduce anindicator for tax structure turbulence which measures thedegree to which a country's tax structure changes from oneyear to another. Using data on 18 OECD countries over theperiod 1965–1995, we find clear evidence of a politicalbudget cycle in national tax structures. More precisely, wefind that in election years, tax structures are changedsignificantly less than in other years. Further, thedispersion of political power significantly lowers the abilityof governments to change the tax structure. We do not,however, find any evidence of partisan budget cycles innational tax systems following political regime changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina, A. and Roubini, N. (1992). Political cycles in OECD economies. Review of Economic Studies 59: 663–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Cohen, G.D. and Roubini, N. (1992). Macroeconomic policy and elections in OECD democracies. Economics and Politics 5: 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Cohen, G.D. and Roubini, N. (1993). Electoral business cycles in industrial democracies. European Journal of Political Economy 9: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Roubini, N. and Cohen, G.D. (1997). Political cycles and the macroeconomy. London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, J.S. and Heyndels, B. (2000). Politicians' opinions on tax reform. Public Choice 103: 117–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. (1979). On the determinants of public debt. Journal of Political Economy 87: 940–971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, Y. (1975). The years of plenty and the years of famine: A political business cycle? Kyklos 28: 400–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizer, D.S. and Durlauf, S.N. (1990). Testing the positive theory of government finance. Journal of Monetary Economics 26: 123–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A. and Nadeau, R. (1992). The electoral budget cycle. Public Choice 74: 389–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breusch, T. and Pagan, A. (1980). The LM test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies 47: 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, J. and Sturm, J.-E. (1997). Political and economic determinants of OECD budget deficits and government expenditures: A reinvestigation. European Journal of Political Economy 13: 739–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deininger, K. and Squire, L. (1996). A new data set measuring income inequality. The World Bank Economic Review 10: 565–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edin, P. and Ohlsson, H. (1991). Political determinants of budget deficits: Coalition effects versus minority effects. European Economic Review 35: 1597–1603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, K.J. (2000). A reassessment of the relationship between inequality and growth. American Economic Review 100: 869–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. and Schneider, F. (1978). An empirical study of politico-economic interaction in the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics 60: 174–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R.J. (1989). Political and economic determinants of budget deficits in the industrial democracies. European Economic Review 33: 934–938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W.H. (1993). Econometric analysis. 2nd edition. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grilli, V., Masciandaro, D. and Tabellini, G. (1991). Political and monetary institutions and public policies in the industrial countries. Economic Policy 13: 341–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46: 1251–1271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettich, W. and Winer, S. (1997). The political economy of taxation. In C. Mueller (Ed.), Perspectives on public choice, 481–505. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettich, W. and Winer, S. (1999). Democratic choice and taxation: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S. and Pashigian, P. (1962). Turnover of firms as a measure of market behavior. Review of Economics and Statistics 44: 82–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Im, K.S., Peseran, M.H. and Shin, Y. (1997). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Mimeo. Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge.

  • Kontopoulos, Y. and Perotti, R. (1998). Government fragmentation and fiscal policy outcomes: Evidence from OECD countries. In J.M. Poterba and J. von Hagen (Ed.), Fiscal institutions and fiscal performance, 81–102. (NBER Conference Report). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A. and Lin, C.-F. (1992). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. University of California, San Diego, Discussion Paper 92093-0508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, A. and Lin, C.-F. (1993). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. University of California, San Diego, Discussion Paper 93-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, N.G. (1987). The optimal collection of seignorage, theory and evidence. Journal of Monetary Economics 20: 327–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messere, K. (1993). Tax policy in OECD countries. Amsterdam: IBFD Publications BV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikesell, J.L. (1978). Election periods and state tax policy cycles. Public Choice 33: 99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. (1988). On the nature and measurement of fiscal illusion: A survey. In G. Brennan et al. (Eds.), Taxation and fiscal federalism: Essays in honour of Russell Mathews, 65–82. Sydney: Australian National University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pack, J.R. (1988). The Congress and fiscal policy. Public Choice 58: 101–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paldam, M. (1979). Is there an electional cycle? A comparative study of national accounts. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 81: 323–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, M.N. (1979). The dynamics of European party systems: Changing patterns of electoral volatility. European Journal of Political Research 7: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (1999). The size and scope of government: Comparative politics with rational politicians. European Economic Review 43: 699–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B.G. (1980). Choices in taxation policy. In T.R. Dye and V. Gray (Eds.), The determinants of public policy. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pommerehne, W.W. and Schneider, W. (1983). Does government in a representative democracy follow a majority of voters' preferences: An empirical examination. In H. Hanush (Ed.), Anatomy of government deficiencies, 61–88. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poterba, J.M. (1994). State responses to fiscal crises: The effects of budgetary institutions and politics. Journal of Political Economy 102: 799–821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open government have bigger governments? Journal for Political Economy 106: 997–1032.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, K. (1990). Equilibrium political budget cycles. American Economic Review 80: 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. (1985). Maximizing tax revenue while minimizing political costs. Journal of Public Policy 5: 289–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubini, N. and Sachs, J.D. (1989). Political and economic determinants of budget deficits in the industrialised democracies. European Economic Review 33: 903–933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmo, S. (1993). Taxation and democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E.R. (1978). Political control of the economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkerink, B. and de Haan, J. (1999). Political and institutional determinants of the tax mix: An empirical investigation for OECD countries. SOM research Report 99E05.

  • Wagner, R.E. (1971). The fiscal organization of American federalism. Chicago: Markham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R.E. (1976). Revenue structure, fiscal illusion and budgetary choice. Public Choice 25: 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woldendorp, J., Keman, H. and Budge, I. (1993). Party government in 20 democracies. European Journal of Political Research, Special Issue 24: 000–000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y. (1996). Are real exchange rates nonstationary?: Evidence from a panel-data test. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 28: 54–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, K.R. (1998). Intervention analysis of electoral tax cycle: The case of Japan. Public Choice 96: 241–258.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ashworth, J., Heyndels, B. Tax Structure Turbulence in OECD Countries. Public Choice 111, 347–376 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014957130671

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014957130671

Keywords

Navigation