Abstract
This article examines some key characteristics of science, under the headings of: the elimination of the personal; demarcation from ethics; and the denial of reflexivity. It relates these characteristics to an instrumental criterion of knowing, which, it is argued, is pervasive in science. The relationship between this complex whole and the interpretative emphasis within both science and the humanities is then examined. The article suggests that these characteristics may underlie the difficulties which science experiences in the curriculum, and that contemporary curricular innovations can be construed as an attempt to address these difficulties by introducing a more thoroughgoing personal, interpretative and humane dimension to the science curriculum. It suggests that there are severe limits to this project.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aikenhead, G.S.: 1996, ‘Science Education: Border Crossing into the Sub-culture of Science’, Studies in Science Education 27, 1-52.
American Association for the Advancement of Science: 1993, Benchmarks for Science Literacy, Oxford University Press, New York.
Bacon, F.: 1857–70, ‘Meditationes Sacrae. De Hæresibus’, in James Spedding, Robert Leslie Ellis & Douglas Denon Heath (eds), The Works of Francis Bacon, Vol. VIII (part II), Longman & Co, London.
Barbour, I.: 1992, Ethics in an Age of Technology, SCM Press, London.
Black, P. & Atkin, J.M.: 1996, Changing the Subject. Innovations in science, mathematics and technology education, Routledge/OECD, London.
Burtt, E.A.: 1932, The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
Churchland, P.M.: 1989, A Neurocomputational Perspective on the Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Dawkins, R.: 1998, Unweaving the Rainbow. Science Delusion and the Appetite for Wonder, Allen Lane, London.
DES/WO: 1991, Science in the National Curriculum (1991), HMSO, London.
DfEE/QCA: 1999, Science. The National Curriculum for England, HMSO, London.
Dirac, P.A.M.: 1963, 'The Physicist's Picture of Nature, Scientific American 208(5), 45-53.
Donnelly, J.F.: 1998, ‘The Place of the Laboratory in Science Teachers' Work’, International Journal of Science Education 20, 585-596.
Donnelly, J.F.: 1999, ‘Interpreting Differences: The Educational Aims of Teachers of Science and History, and Their Implications’, Journal of Curriculum Studies 31, 17-41.
Donnelly, J.F.: 1999, 'Schooling Heidegger: On Being in the Classroom, Teaching and Teacher Education 15, 933-949.
Donnelly, J.F., Buchan, A., Jenkins, E., Laws, P. & Welford, G.: 1996, Investigations by Order. Policy, Curriculum and Science Teachers' Work under the Education Reform Act, Studies in Education, Driffield.
Eger, M.: 1993a, ‘Hermeneutics as an Approach to Science, part I’, Science & Education 2, 1-30.
Eger, M.: 1993b, ‘Hermeneutics as an Approach to Science, part II’, Science & Education 2, 303-328.
Finley, F. et al.: 1995, Proceedings, Third International History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching Conference, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Ford, S. & Baxter, M: 1998. ‘Comments from the 11–16 Committee’, Education in Science 179, 29.
Frazer, M.J. & Kornhauser, A.: 1986, Ethics and Social Responsibility in Science Education, Pergamon/ICSU, Oxford.
Fullick, P. & Ratcliffe, M.: 1996, Teaching Ethical Aspects of Science, Bassett Press, Southampton.
Giddens, A.: 1983, The Constitution of Society, Polity, Cambridge Press.
Giddens, A.: 1991, Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
Goldman, A.I.: 1999, Knowledge in a Social World, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Gooding, D., Pinch, T. & Schaffer, S. (eds): 1989, The Uses of Experiment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Gooding, D.: 1990, Experiment and the Making of Meaning, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Habermas, J.: 1972, Knowledge and Human Interests, Heinemann, London.
Hacking, I.: 1999, The Social Construction of What?, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Head, J.: 1985, The Personal Response to Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Heidegger, M.: 1962, Being and Time, Blackwell, London.
Heidegger, M.: 1978, ‘The Question Concerning Technology’, in Basic Writings, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp. 283-318.
Herget, D.E.: 1989, The History and Philosophy of Science and Science Teaching, Proceedings of the First International Conference, Science Education and Department of Philosophy, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.
Hills, S.: 1992, The History and Philosophy of Science in Science Education, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the History and Philosophy of Science and Science Teaching, Faculty of Education, Queens University at Kingston, Ontario.
Hodson, D.: 1998, Teaching and Learning Science: Towards a Personalized Approach,Open University Press, Buckingham.
Ihde, D.: 1998, Expanding Hermeneutics. Visualism in Science, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL.
Irzik, G.: 1998, ‘Philosophy of Science and Radical Intellectual Islam in Turkey’, in W.A. Cobern (ed.), Socio-cultural Perspectives on Science Education. An International Dialogue, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Jenkins, E.W.: 1996, ‘The ‘Nature of Science’ as a Curriculum Component’, Journal of Curriculum Studies 28, 2, 137-50.
Kim, J.: 1998, ‘The Mind-body Problem after Fifty Years’, in A. O'Hear (ed.), Current Issues in Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3-23.
Lacey, H.: 1999, ‘Scientific Understanding and the Control of Nature’, Science & Education 8(1), 13-35.
Lacey, H.: 1999, Is Science Value Free? Values and Scientific Understanding, Routledge, London.
Lorimer, D.: 1998, The Spirit of Science. From Experiment to Experience, Floris Books, Edinburgh.
MacIntyre, A.: 1987, After Virtue. A Study in Moral Theory, Duckworth, London.
Maxwell, N.: 1984, From Knowledge to Wisdom. A Revolution in the Aims and Methods of Science, Blackwell, Oxford.
McComas, W.F.: 1998, The Nature of Science in Science Education, Rationales and Strategies, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
McDowell, J.: 1996, Mind and World, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Merton, R.K.: 1973, ‘The Normative Structure of Science’, in The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 267-278.
Moran, D.: 2000. ‘Husserl and the Crisis of European Science’, in M.W.F. Stone & J. Wolff (eds), The Proper Ambition of Science, Routledge, London, pp., 122-150.
Nagel, T.: 1986, The View from Nowhere, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
O'Hear, A.: 1989, Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Ogborn, J.: 1995, ‘Recovering Reality’, Studies in Science Education 25, 25-38.
Pickering, A.: 1995, The Mangle of Practice. Time, Agency, and Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Poole, M.: 1995, Beliefs and Values in Science Education, Open University Press, Buckingham, UK.
Radder, H.: 1988, The Material Realization of Science, van Gorcum, Maastricht.
Reiss, M. & Straughan, R.: 1996, Improving Nature? The Science and Ethics of Genetic Engineering, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rorty, R.: 1980, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Blackwell, Oxford.
Science & Education: 1999, Special Issue on Values in Science and in Science Education 8(1).
Solomon, J. & Aikenhead, G.: 1994, STS Education. International Perspectives on Reform, Teachers College Press, New York.
Turner, S. & Sullenger, K.: 1999, ‘Kuhn in the Classroom, Lakatos in the Lab: Science Educators Confront the Nature of Science Debate’, Science, Technology and Human Values 24, 5-30.
Williams, B.: 1985, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, Fontana/Collins, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Donnelly, J. Instrumentality, Hermeneutics and the Place of Science in the School Curriculum. Science & Education 11, 135–153 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014474422345
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014474422345