Abstract
As traditional secrecy surrounding adoption has waned, the behavioral sciences, particularly the mental health community, have remained largely silent, particularly on postadoption issues. Reasons for this silence are suggested. Research on adoption is difficult to conduct. The mental health community may desire to see adoption as professional problem-solving and as a “favor” done to all involved. Problems in adoption thus represent both a failure on the part of those professionals and a favor gone bad. Fear that discussing adoption-related problems will lead to adoption itself being labeled as pathological is also likely operating to support the silence. Privacy issues for the adoptive and birth families are also important. Sexuality and childbirth have long been areas not sufficiently addressed, but with the addition of the “illegitimacy” common in adoption they are even more controversial. Issues of poverty, powerlessness, social class, and race also are difficult to face, as is the business aspect of adoption. Acknowledging the reasons for the silence may be the first step in addressing it. Other steps, such as continuing education programs and publication of information on postadoption issues are also suggested.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
American Psychological Association. (1995). Guidelines and principles for the accreditation of programs in professional psychology. Washington, DC: Author.
Andersen, R., & Tucker, R. (2000). Conflict resolution on the bridge less traveled. Paper presented at the 2000 American Adoption Congress Convention, Nashville, TN.
Brodzinsky, D. M. (1990). A stress and coping model of adoption adjustment. In D. Brodzinsky & M. Schechter (Eds.), The psychology of adoption. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brodzinsky, D. M., & Schechter, M. (1992). Being adopted: The lifelong search for self. New York: Doubleday.
Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute. (1997, November). Benchmark adoption survey: Report on the findings. Princeton Survey Research Associates. New York: Author.
Henderson, D. B. (1994). Test your adoption knowledge. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point.
Henderson, D. B. (2000). Adoption issues in perspective: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 9, 261-272.
Holt, M. I. (1992). The orphan trains: Placing out in America. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.
Kessler, R. C., McGonagle, K. A., Zhao, S., Nelson, C., Hughes, M., & Eshleman, S. (1994). Lifetime and 12 month prevalence of DSMIIIR psychiatric disorders in the United States. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 8-19.
Kirschner, D. (1990). The adopted child syndrome: Considerations for psychotherapy. Psychotherapy in Private Practice, 8(3), 93-100.
Kirschner, D. (1992). Understanding adoptees who kill: Dissociation, patricide, and the psychodynamics of adoption. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 36(4), 323-333.
Learn, S., & Heinz, S. (1998, December 6). Adoption fight pits diverse groups. The Oregonian.
Lifton, B. J. (1994). Journey of the adopted self: A quest for wholeness. New York: Basic Books.
National Committee For Adoption. (1995a). Ohio Governor misled that there is a consensus on open records. National Adoption Reports, 16(10), 10-11.
National Committee ForAdoption. (1995b). Attacks onAdoption: More from Reuben Pannor. National Adoption Reports, 16(5), 11.
National Committee For Adoption. (1997a). MD set to open records. National Adoption Reports, 18(2), 4.
National Committee For Adoption. (1997b). Open records and antiadoption groups hail “Secrets and Lies.” National Adoption Reports, 18(2), 4.
National Committee For Adoption. (1997c). PBS slams confidentiality. National Adoption Reports, 18(2), 3.
Nydam, R. (1999). Adoptees come of age. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.
Pavao, J. M., Groza, V., & Rosenberg, K. F. (1998). Treatment issues in adoption practice from a triad and system perspective. In V. Groza & K. F. Rosenberg (Eds.), Clinical and practice issues in adoption. New York: Praeger.
Pierce, W. (1997). Who stands for adoption? National Adoption Reports, 18(2), 1-2.
Post, D. E. (1999). Adoption in the college classroom: Who is training clinicians about the particular issues of adoption triad members? Paper presented at the 1999 meeting of the American Adoption Congress, McLean, VA.
Post, D. E. (2000). Adoption in clinical psychology: A review of the absence, ramifications and recommendations for change. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 9, 361-372.
Ross, C.A. (1991). Epidemiology ofmultiple personality disorder and dissociation. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 14, 503-517.
Sass, D. A., & Henderson, D. B. (1999). Adoption issues: Preparation of psychologists and an evaluation of the need for continuing education. Paper presented at the 1999 meeting of the American Adoption Congress, McLean, VA.
Sass, D. A., & Henderson, D. B. (2000).Adoption issues: Preparation of psychologists and an evaluation of the need for continuing education. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 9, 349-359.
Sass, D. A., Webster, J. M., & Henderson, D. B. (2000). An investigation of triad members' therapeutic experiences related to adoption. Paper presented at the 2000 meeting of the American Adoption Congress, Nashville, TN.
Wegar, K. (1997). Adoption, identity, and kinship: The debate over sealed birth records. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Henderson, D.B. Challenging the Silence of the Mental Health Community on Adoption Issues. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless 11, 131–141 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014311817729
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014311817729