Skip to main content

Adoption: Right to Information Versus Right to Confidentiality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Child Safety, Welfare and Well-being

Abstract

It is now widely recognized that the knowledge of origin is extremely important to many adoptees, because they see this knowledge as vital to their identity. The ICPS (Integrated Child Protection Scheme) accedes to this idea. However, by virtue of the right to respect the privacy and family life, the families of origin have the right not to want to be known or even to be contacted. For example, some mothers or families have no wish to revive the past because of the surrounding taboo, or of the acute suffering that the incident might trigger. There are also cases in which a mother has completely hidden the abandonment of her child from her family and cannot divulge the secret for fear of her own security and also of her family. Indeed, the right of the adoptee to search for his roots or identity stands in radical contrast with the birth mother’s right to secrecy and confidentiality of her identity. The “search” threatens to spark serious repercussions on the emotional well-being of the adoption triad, that is, the adoptee, the birth parent, and the adoptive parents. This article will discuss various issues related to the root search of adopted children and the challenges involved in it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brodzinsky, D. M., Schechter, M. D., & Henig, R. (1992). Being adopted: The lifelong search for self. Toronto: Anchor Books, Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freundlich, M. (2000). Adoption and ethics: The market forces in adoption (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidelines Governing the Adoption of Children. (2011) http://www.adoptionindia.nic.in.

  • Hague Convention on Inter-country Adoption. (1993) (http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=69).

  • Krueger, M., Jago, J. & Hanna, F. J. (1997). Why adopted persons search: An existential treatment perspective. Journal of Counseling and Development, 75. Retrieved December 2, 2006, from the Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, L. K. vs. Union of India case of 1982, Supreme Court of India website.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letter to CARA from Maharastra based adoption agencies on root search. (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifton, B. J. (1994). Journey of the adopted self: A quest for wholeness. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, J. (2013). Ethnic and racial socialization and self-esteem of Asian adoptees: The mediating role of multiple identities. Journal of Adolescence, 36(1), 161–170. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, R. A. (1994). Stages of emotion: An adult adoptee’s post reunion perspective. Child Welfare Journal, 73, 249–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickman, S. L., Rosenfeld, A. A., Fine, P., MacIntyre, J. C., Pilowsky, D. J., Howe, R. A., & Sveda, S. A. (2005). Children in adoptive families: Overview and update. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 44(10), 987–995. doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000174463.60987.69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickman, S. L. (1985). Losses in adoption: The need for dialogue. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 40, 365–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco, F., & Eme, R. (1993). An outcome study of the reunion between adoptees and biological parents. Child Welfare, 72, 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachel, H. & Peter, N. (2002). Implementation handbook for the convention on the rights of the child. UNICEF, USA (http://www.holtintl.org/ethics.shtml).

  • Report and Conclusions of the Second Special Commission on the Practical Operation of the Hague Convention of 29 May 1993 on protection of children and co-operation in respect of intercountry adoption (17–23 September 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Case for Transracial Adoption (afabcwebsite).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Convention on Rights of the Child. (UNCRC 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF guidance note on inter-country adoption in the CEE/CIS region. September 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jagannath Pati .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pati, J. (2016). Adoption: Right to Information Versus Right to Confidentiality. In: Deb, S. (eds) Child Safety, Welfare and Well-being. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2425-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2425-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2424-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2425-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics