Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 1–9 | Cite as

Miracles and the limits of medical knowledge

  • William E. Stempsey


In considering whether medical miracles occur, thelimits of epistemology bring us to confront ourmetaphysical worldview of medicine and nature ingeneral. This raises epistemological questions of ahigher order. David Hume's understanding of miraclesas violations of the laws of nature assumes thatnature is completely regular, whereas doctrines suchas C. S. Peirce's ``tychism'' hold that there is anelement of absolute chance in the workings of theuniverse. Process philosophy gives yet another viewof the working of nature. Physicians have noepistemological grounds for declaring any cure to bemiraculous. Miracles are theological (orphilosophical) entities, and not medical entities. All physicians can do is to determine whether or nota cure is scientifically inexplicable according to thecurrent epistemological standards of medical science. As these standards change, what is currentlyunexplainable may become explainable. However, we canalso come to realize that our current explanations arein fact unsatisfactory. Our justifications ofknowledge claims about miracles will depend on ourviews about determinism and indeterminism. If theuniverse is not a deterministic one, we should be opento the possibility of encountering what appear to usas sui generis events. These would not beviolations of immutable laws of nature, butmanifestations of the true workings of nature, andcertainly causes for wonder.

determinism epistemology Hume laws of nature metaphysics miracle Peirce Whitehead 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ai, A.L., R.E. Dunkle, C. Peterson and S.F. Bolling: 1998, 'The Role of Private Prayer in Psychological Recovery Among Midlife and Aged Patients Following Cardiac Surgery', Gerontologist 38, 591-601.Google Scholar
  2. Aquinas, St. Thomas: 1928, Summa Contra Gentiles, book 3, trans. the English Dominican Fathers from the latest Leonine ed. London: Burns Oates & Washbourne.Google Scholar
  3. Aquinas, St. Thomas: 1975, Summa Theologiae, vol. 14, trans. T. C. O'Brien. London: Blackfriars.Google Scholar
  4. Augustine, St.: 1982, The Literal Meaning of Genesis, trans. J.H. Taylor. New York: Newman Press.Google Scholar
  5. Catholic News Service: 1997, 'Cure of Brockton Girl Recognized as Miracle', The Pilot 168(15), April 11.Google Scholar
  6. Flew, A.: 1990, 'Fogelin on Hume on Miracles', Hume Studies 16, 141-144.Google Scholar
  7. Fogelin, R.J.: 1990, 'What Hume Actually Said About Miracles', Hume Studies 16, 81-86.Google Scholar
  8. Hartshorne, C.: 1968, Beyond Humanism: Essays in the Philosophy of Nature. Lincoln: Bison, University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hartshorne, C.: 1991, 'A Reply to My Critics', in: L.E. Hahn (ed.), The Philosophy of Charles Hartshorne. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court, pp. 569-731.Google Scholar
  10. Holland, P.F.: 1965, 'The Miraculous', American Philosophical Quarterly 2, 43-51.Google Scholar
  11. Houston, J.: 1994, Reported Miracles: A Critique of Hume. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hume, D.: 1996, 'Of Miracles', Part 10 of An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1748), reprinted in Hume on Miracles, ed. and introduced by S. Tweyman. Bristol, England: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
  13. Levin, J.S.: 1996, 'How Prayer Heals: A Theoretical Model', Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine 2, 66-73.Google Scholar
  14. Lewis, C.S.: 1978, Miracles. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
  15. Manning, S. and L.J. Schneiderman: 1996, 'Miracles or Limits: What Message from the Medical Marketplace?', H E C Forum 8, 103-108.Google Scholar
  16. McKinnon, A.: 1967, ' "Miracle" and "Paradox" ', American Philosophical Quarterly 4, 308-314.Google Scholar
  17. O'Laoire, S.: 1997, 'An Experimental Study of the Effects of Distant, Intercessory Prayer on Self-esteem, Anxiety, and Depression', Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine 3, 38-53.Google Scholar
  18. Peirce, C.S.: 1931, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, ed. C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss, 6 volumes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Roberts, L., I. Ahmed, S. Hall, C. Sargent and C. Adams: 1998, 'Intercessory Prayer for Ill Health: A Systematic Review', Forschende Komplementarmedizin 5 Suppl. S1, 82-86.Google Scholar
  20. Swinburne, R.: 1970, The Concept of Miracle. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
  21. Tillich, P.: 1967, Systematic Theology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Whitehead, A.N.: 1929, Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Whitehead, A.N.: 1933, Adventures of Ideas. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Whitehead, A.N.: 1958, Modes of Thought. New York: Capricorn Books.Google Scholar
  25. Woodward, K.L.: 1996, Making Saints: How the Catholic Church Determines Who Becomes a Saint, Who Doesn't, and Why. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • William E. Stempsey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyCollege of the Holy CrossWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations