Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical Relationships between Solar, Interplanetary, and Geomagnetospheric Disturbances, 1976–2000

  • Published:
Cosmic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within the framework of the Space Weather program, 25-year data sets for solar X-ray observations, measurements of plasma and magnetic field parameters in the solar wind, and D st index variations are analyzed to reveal the factors that have had the greatest influence on the development of magnetospheric storms. The correlation between solar flares and magnetic storms practically does not exceed a level of correlation for random processes. In particular, no relation was found between the importance of solar flares and the minimum of the D st index for storms that could be connected with considered flares by their time delay. The coronal mass ejections (CME; data on these phenomena cover a small part of the interval) result in storms with D st < –60 nT only in half of the cases. The most geoeffective interplanetary phenomena are the magnetic clouds (MC), which many believe to be interplanetary manifestations of CMEs, and compressions in the region of interaction of slow and fast streams in the solar wind (the so-called Corotating Interaction Region, CIR). They correspond to about two-thirds of all observed magnetic storms. For storms with –100 < D st < –60 nT, the frequencies of storms from MC and CIR being approximately equal. For strong storms with D st < – 100 nT, the fraction of storms from MC is considerably higher. The problems of reliable prediction of geomagnetic disturbances from observations of the Sun and conditions in interplanetary space are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Solar Drivers of Interplanetary and Terrestrial Disturbances, Balasubramaniam, K.S., Keil, S.L., and Smartt, R.N., Eds., ASP Conference Series, 1996.

  2. Webb, D.F., Coronal Mass Ejections: The Key to Major Interplanetary and Geomagnetic Disturbances, Rev. Geophys. Suppl., 1995, p. 577.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gonzalez, W.D., Tsurutani, B.T., and Clua de Gonzalez, A.L., Interplanetary Origin of Geomagnetic Storms, Space Sci. Rev., 1999, vol. 88, p. 529.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crooker, N.U., Solar and Heliospheric Geoeffective Disturbances, J. of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 2000, vol. 62, p. 1071.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Petrukovich, A.A. and Klimov, S.I., The Use of Solar Wind Measurements for the Analysis and Prediction of Geomagnetic Activity, Kosm. Issled., 2000, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 463-468.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gosling, J.T., McComas, D.J., Phillips, J.L., and Bame, S.J., Geomagnetic Activity Associated with Earth Passage of Interplanetary Shock Disturbances and Coronal Mass Ejections, J. Geophys. Res., 1991, vol. 96, p. 7831.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gosling, J.T. and Pizzo, V.J., Formation and Evolution of Corotating Interaction Regions and Their Three-Dimensional Structure, Space Sci. Rev., 1999, vol. 89, p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Miroshnichenko, L.I., Solar-Terrestrial Links, in Fizika kosmosa: malen'kaya entsiklopediya (Physics of Space: A Small Encyclopedia), Syunyaev, R.A., Ed., Moscow: Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya, 1986, p. 629.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gosling, J.T., The Solar Flare Myth, J. Geophys. Res., 1993, vol. 98, p. 18937.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Webb, D.F., Cliver, E.W., Crooker, N.U., et al., Relationship of Halo Coronal Mass Ejections, Magnetic Clouds, and Magnetic Storms, J. Geophys. Res., 2000, vol. 105, p. 7491.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Burlaga, L.F.E., Magnetic Clouds vol. 2 of Physics of the Inner Magnetosphere, Schwenn, R. and Marsch, E., Eds., New York: Springer, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Burlaga, L., Fitzenreiter, R., Lepping, R., et al., A Magnetic Cloud Containing Prominence Material: January 1997, J. Geophys. Res., 1998, vol. 103, p. 277.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shodhan, S., Crooker, N.U., Kahler, S.W., et al., Counterstreaming Electrons in Magnetic Clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 2000, vol. 105, p. 27261.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Russell, C.T. and McPherron, R.L., Semiannual Variation of Geomagnetic Activity, J. Geophys. Res., 1973, vol. 78, p. 241.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yermolaev, Yu.I., Zastenker, G.N., and Nikolaeva, N.S., The Earth's Magnetosphere Response to Solar Wind Events according to the INTERBALL Project Data, Kosm. Issled., 2000, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 563-576.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gopalswamy, N., Lara, A., and Lepping, R.P., et al., Interplanetary Acceleration of Coronall Mass Ejections, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2000, vol. 27, p. 145.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Webb, D.F., Geomagnetic Storms and Heliospheric CMEs as Viewed from HELIOS, in Solar Drivers of Interplanetary and Terrestrial Disturbances, ASP Conference Series, 1996, vol. 95, p. 167.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yermolaev, Yu.I., Strong Geomagnetic Disturbances and Their Correlation with Interplanetary Phenomena during the Operation of the INTERBALL Project Satellites, Kosm. Issled., 2001, vol. 39, no. 3, p. 324-331.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lindsay, G.M., Russell, C.T., and Luhman, J.G., Coronal Mass Ejection and Stream Interaction Region Characteristics and Their Potential Geomagnetic Effectiveness, J. Geophys. Res., 1995, vol. 100, p. 16999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yermolaev, Y.I., Yermolaev, M.Y. Statistical Relationships between Solar, Interplanetary, and Geomagnetospheric Disturbances, 1976–2000. Cosmic Research 40, 1–14 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014233732330

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014233732330

Keywords

Navigation