Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Productivity in word formation (WF): A morphological approach

  • Published:
Acta Linguistica Hungarica

Abstract

Grammatical productivity of the potential system of WF (1) is distinguishedfrom type frequency (on the level of language as institution) and token frequency(level of performance), where pragmatic factors intervene (2). It is a hyponymof legal regularity and creativity, different from default, probability ofWFR application, e.g., in rule competition, and analogy. Restrictions on actualvs. potential domains do not restrict productivity itself, as shown by ordinalnumber formation (3) and German feminine motion (4). The main part focusseson qualitative gradation of grammatical productivity (5), its theoreticalbases and methodological consequences (6), including stratified lexica (7).External evidence from poetic license is adduced in 10 . Hierarchical paradigmaticorganization of WF (8) includes the levels of derivational paradigm, microclass,class, and their higher sets. Typologically, agglutinating WF (e.g., Hungarian)is richer than in ecting WF (9). This contribution represents a plea (a) forthe analytic separation of grammar and pragmatics also in the area of productivity,(b) for the unity of inflection and derivation, (c) for the close connectionbetween morphological meaning and form.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alloni-Feinberg, Y. 1977. Linguistic and socio-demographic factors influencing the acceptance of Hebrew neologisms. PhD thesis, University of Jerusalem.

  • Anderson, S.R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • André, J. 1971. Emprunts et suffixes nominaux en latin. Droz, Genève.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, M. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, R.H. 1989. A corpus-based approach to morphological productivity. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit te Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, R.H. 1992. Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. In: Yearbook of Morphology 1991, 109-49. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, R.H. 1994. Productivity in language production. In: Language and Cognitive Pro-cesses 9: 447-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, R.H.-Lieber, R. 1991. Productivity and English derivation: a corpus-based study. In: Linguistics 29: 801-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, R.H.-Neijts, A. 1997. Productivity incontext: a case study in a Dutch suffix. In: Linguistics 35: 565-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, R.H.-Renouf, A. 1996. Chronicling the Times: productive lexical innovations in an English newspaper. In: Language 72: 69-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barz, I. 1988. Nomination durch Wortbildung. Enzyklopädie, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barz, I. 1998. Neologie und Wortbildung: Zum Neuheitswert von Wortbildungen. In: Teubert, W. (ed.): Neologie und Korpus, 11-30. Narr, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, L. 1983. English word-formation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, L. 1997. Derivational paradigms. In: Yearbook of Morphology 1996, 243-56. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beard, R. 1995. Lexeme-morpheme base morphology. State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, R. A. 1987. Productivity in the lexicon: new-word formation in the lexicon. In: Folia Linguistica 21: 425-61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrendonner, A.-Clavier, V. 1997. Examen d'une série morphologique dite-improductive-en francais: les noms dénominaux en -age. In: Corbin et al., 35-44.

  • Booij, G. 1977. Dutch morphology. Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristofidou, A. 1994. Okkasionalismen in poetischen Texten. Narr, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clahsen, H. et al. 1996. Morphological structure and the processing of inflected words. In: Essex research reports in linguistics 13: 1-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, D. 1987. Morphologie dérivationnelle et structuration du lexique. Niemeyer, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, D. (ed.) 1991. La formation des mots: structures et interpretations. Presses universitaires de Lille.

  • Corbin, D. 1997a. Entre les mots possibles et les mots existants: les unités lexicales-a faible probabilité d' actualization. In: Corbin et al., 79-90.

  • Corbin, D. 1997b. La représentation d'une-famille-de mots dans le Dictionnaire déri-vationnel du francais et ses corrélats théoriques, méthodologiques et descriptifs. In: Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 26: 5-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, D. et al. (eds). 1997. Mots possibles et mots existants. Silexicales 1. Université de Lille.

  • Coseriu, E. 1975. System, Norm und Rede. In: Coseriu, E.: Sprachtheorie und allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, 11-101. Fink, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dal, G. 1997. Tous les mots existants sont-ils possibles? In: Corbin et al., 91-100.

  • Doleschal, U. 1992. Movierung im Deutschen. Lincom Europa, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, W.U. 1981. General principles of poetic licence in word formation. In: Albrecht, J. (ed.): Logos Semanticos, Festschrift Coseriu, 423-31. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, W.U. 1989. Prototypical diérences between inflection and derivation. In: Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 42: 3-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, W.U. 1993. Word-formation: poetic license. In: Asher, R.-Simpson, J. (eds): The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 5028-9. Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, W.U. 1997. On productivity and potentiality in inflectional morphology. CLASNET Working Paper 7. Université de Montréal.

  • Dressler, W.U.-Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. 1997. Polish inflection classes within Natural Morphology. In: Bulletin de la Société Polonaise de Linguistique 53: 95-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, W.U.-Lad-anyi, M. 1998. On grammatical productivity of word formation rules (WFRs). In: Wiener linguistische Gazette 62-63: 29-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, W.U.-Mayerthaler, W.-Panagl, O.-Wurzel, W.U. 1987. Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, W.U.-Merlini Barbaresi, L. 1994. Morphopragmatics. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressler, W.U.-Thornton, A.M. 1996. Italian nominal inflection. In: Wiener linguistische Gazette 55-57: 1-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erben, J. 1993. Einführung in die deutsche Wortbildungslehre. Schmidt, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erben, J. 1996. Vorstöße oder Verstöße: Versuch einer Einsch.atzung von A. Kerrs Neologis-men. In: König, W.-Ortner, L. (eds): Sprachgeschichtliche Untersuhungen zum älteren und neueren Deutsch, Festschrift H. Wellmann, 1-11. Winter, Heidelberg.

  • Erben, J. 1997. Zum Problem der Nominationsvarianten. Bemerkungen zu Benennungsver-suchen in Theaterkritiken Alfred Kerrs. In: Barz, I.-Schröder, M. (eds): Nominations-forschung im Deutschen, Festschrift W. Fleischer, 399-406. Lang, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frauenfelder, U.H.-Schreuder, R. 1992. Constraining psycholinguitic models of morphologi-cal processing and representation: the role of productivity. In: Yearbook of Morphology 1991, 165-83. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrhop, N. 1998. Grenzfälle morphologischer Einheiten. Stauénburg, Tübingen (in print).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacken, P. ten 1994. Defining morphology. Olms, Hildesheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastovsky, D. 1982. Wortbildung und Semantik. Francke, Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, F. 1998. How to combine functional and formal approaches. Unpublished paper given in Prague (March 1998).

  • Kilani-Schoch, M. 1988. Introduction ä la morphologie naturelle. Lang, Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirscher-Durand, Ch. 1997. Mots possibles et mots existants dans une langue morte comme le latin. In: Corbin et al., 173-80.

  • Köpcke, K.-M. 1993. Schemata bei der Pluralbildung im Deutschen: Versuch einer kognitiven Morphologie. Narr, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladänyi, M. 2000. Productivity as a sign of category change: the case of Hungarian verbal prefixes. In: Dressler, W.U.-Pfeiér, O.E.-Pöchtrager, M.A.-Rennison, J.R. (eds): Morphological analysis in comparison (Current issues in linguistic theory, 201), 113-41. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima, S.D.-Corrigan, R.L.-Iverson, G.K. (eds) 1994. The reality of linguistic rules. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marle, J. van 1985. On the paradigmatic dimension of morphological creativity. Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marle, J. van 1988. On the role of semantics in productivity change. In: Yearbook of Morphology 1988, 139-54. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marle, J. van 1992. The relationship between morphological productivity and frequency: a comment onBaayen's performance-oriented conception of morphological productivity. In: Yearbook of Morphology 1991, 151-63. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matussek, M. 1994. Wortneubildung im Text. Buske, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayerthaler, W. 1977. Studien zur französischen und theoretischen Morphologie. Niemeyer, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, E.A. 1975. Verb borrowing. In: Wiener linguistische Gazette 8: 3-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, E.A. 1978. Language contact. In: Greenberg, J.H. (ed.): Universals of human language, 95-122. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motsch, Wolfgang. 1981. Der kreative Aspekt in der Wortbildung. In: Lipka, L. (ed.): Wortbildung, 94-118. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osman, N. 1994. Kleines Lexikon untergegangener Wörter. Beck, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petralli, A. 1996. Neologismi e nuovi media. CLUEB, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilhak, L. 1975. Das Adjektiv in den Dichtungen Georg Trakls: Untersuchungen zur Syntax, Wortbildung und Semantik. PhD thesis, University of Innsbruck.

  • Pinker, S.-Prince, A. 1994. Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammar. In: Lima, S.D. et al. (eds), 321-51.

  • Plag, I.-Dalton-Puér, C.-Baayen, H. 2000. Morphological productivity across speech and writing. Ms.

  • Pöchtrager, M.-Bodó, Cs.-Dressler, W.U.-Schweiger, T. 1998. On some inflectional properties of the agglutinating type, illustrated from Finnish, Hungarian and Turkish inflection. In: Wiener linguistische Gazette 62-63: 57-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poitou, J. 1997. Régularité, analyses quantitatives et productivité: quelques remarques. In: Corbin et al., 221-30.

  • Pounder, A. 1987. Systemangemessenheit in der Wortbildung am Beispiel desubstantivischer Adjektivableitung im Deutschen. PhD thesis, University of Vienna.

  • Rainer, F. 1988. Towards a theory of blocking: The case of Italian and German quality nouns. In: Yearbook of Morphology 1988, 155-85. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainer, F. 1993. Spanische Wortbildungslehre. Niemeyer, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainer, F. 1996. Copernicano e Luterano: sul ruolo del latino nella derivazione deantropo-nimica italiana. In: Lingua Nostra 57: 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainer, F. 1997a. Vers une contrainte sur les stades dérivationnelles virtuelles. In: Corbin et al., 231-40.

  • Rainer, F. 1997b. Allomorfia e analogia: le condizioni d'impiego dell'allomorfo in-u-(tipo man-u-ale) in latino e in italiano. Ms.

  • Sánchez Miret, F.-Koliadis, A.-Dressler, W.U. 1997. Connectionism vs. rules in diachronic morphology. In:Folia Linguistica Historica 18: 149-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandra, D. 1994. The morphology of the mental lexicon: internal word structure viewed from a psycholinguistic perspective. In: Language and Cognitive Processes 9: 227-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J.R. 1991. Linguistic categorizations: prototypes in linguistic theory. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, M. 1996. Pour une sémantique des mots construits. Septentrion, Villeneuve d'Ascq.

  • Thymé, A.-Ackerman, F.-Elman, J. 1994. Finnish nominal inflection: paradigmatic patterns and token analogy. In: Lima, S.D. et al. (eds), 445-66.

  • Ülkü, V. 1980. Affixale Wortbildung im Deutschen und Türkischen. Ankara Üniversitesi Basmevi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uluxanov, I.S. 1977. Slovoobrazovatel'naja semantika v russkom jazyke. Nauka, Moskva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellmann, H. 1975. Deutsche Wortbildung: Typen und Tendenzen in der Gegenwartssprache II: Das Substantiv. Schwann, Düsseldorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurzel, W.U. 1984. Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin. [English translation: 1989. Inflectional morphology and naturalness. Kluwer, Dordrecht.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Wüster, E. 1979. Einführung in die allgemeine Terminologielehre und Terminologische Lexikographie. Springer, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemskaja, E.A. 1973. Sovremennyj russkij jazyk. Proveščenie, Moskva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemskaja, E.A. 1992. Slovoobrazovanije kak dejatel'nost'. Nauka, Moskva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemskaja, E.A. (ed.) 1996. Russkij jazyk konca XX stoletija (1985-1995). Jazyki Russkoj Kul'tury, Moskva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemskaja, E.A.-Kitajgorodskaja, M.V.-Širjaev, E.N. 1981. Russkaja razgovornaja reč. Nauka, Moskva.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut fü ur Sprachwissenschaft, Universitäat Wien, Berggasse, 11 1090, Wien, Austria. E-mail

    Wolfgang U. Dressler

  2. Általáanos és Alkalmazott Nyelvészeti Tanszék Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem, P.O.Box 107, 1364, Budapest, Hungary. E-mail

    Mária Ladányi

Authors
  1. Wolfgang U. Dressler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mária Ladányi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dressler, W.U., Ladányi, M. Productivity in word formation (WF): A morphological approach. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 47, 103–145 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014010530824

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014010530824

Keywords

Search

Navigation