Skip to main content
Log in

A case-based reasoning approach for automating disassembly process planning

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the first processes for preparing a product for reuse, remanufacture or recycle is disassembly. Disassembly is the process of systematic removal of desirable constituents from the original assembly so that there is no impairment to any useful component. As the number of components in a product increases, the time required for disassembly, as well as the complexity of planning for disassembly rises. Thus, it is important to have the capability to generate disassembly process plans quickly in order to prevent interruptions in processing especially when multiple products are involved. Case-based reasoning (CBR) approach can provide such a capability. CBR allows a process planner to rapidly retrieve, reuse, revise, and retain solutions to past disassembly problems. Once a planning problem has been solved and stored in the case memory, a planner can retrieve and reuse the product's disassembly process plan at any time. The planner can also adapt an original plan for a new product, which does not have an existing plan in case memory. Following adaptation and application, a successful plan is retained in the case memory for future use. This paper presents the procedures to initialize a case memory for different product platforms, and to operate a CBR system, which can be used to plan disassembly processes. The procedures are illustrated using examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldwin, C. Y. and Clark, K. B. (1997) Managing in the age of modularity. Harvard Business Review, 75(5), 84-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, D. and Chopra, M. (1997) A case-based NC code generating system for prismatic parts. International Journal of Production Research, 35(7), 1925-1943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, L., Gupta, S. M. and Taleb, K. (1994) Operations planning issues in an assembly/disassembly environment. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 14(9), 57-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, P. and Smyth, B. (1997) Case-based reasoning in scheduling: Reusing solution components. International Journal of Production Research, 35(11), 2947-2961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, P. S. (1994) Salvageability by design. IEEE Spectrum, August 18–21.

  • Grenchus, E., Keene, R. and Nobs, C. (1997) Demanufacturing of information technology equipment. Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, May 5–7, San Francisco, California, pp. 157-160.

  • Gungor, A. and Gupta, S. M. (1999) Issues in environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery: A survey. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 36(4), 811-853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. M. and McLean C. R. (1996) Disassembly of products. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 31, 225-228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. M. and Taleb, K. (1994) Scheduling disassembly. International Journal of Production Research, 32(8), 1857-1866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. M. and Veerakamolmal, P. (2000) Environmental issues: Reuse and recycling in manufacturing systems. Encyclopedia of Production and Manufacturing Management, Paul Swamidass (ed.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 192-197. ISBN: 0-7923-8630-2.

  • Hammond, K. J. (1989) Case-Based Planning, Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, J. (1993) Case-Based Reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusiak, A. (1991) Planning, scheduling, and control of flexible manufacturing systems. Handbook of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, Jha, N. K. (ed.), Academic Press, London, pp. 1-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, M. L., Balachandran, M. B. and Zhang, D. M. (1995) Case-Based Reasoning in Design, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. H. and Lehnerd, A. P. (1997) The Power of Product Platforms: Building Value and Cost Leadership, The Free Press, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meziane, F., Vadera, S., Kobbacy, K. and Proudlove, N. (2000) Intelligent systems in manufacturing: Current developments and future prospects. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 11(4), 218-238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyer, L. and Gupta, S. M. (1997) Environmental concerns and recycling/disassembly effects in the electronics industry. Journal of Electronics Manufacturing, 7(1), 1-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridder, C. and Scheidt, L. G. (1998) Practical experiences in the Sony disassembly evaluation workshop. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, May 4–6, Oak Brook, Illinois, pp. 94-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, K. and Gupta, S. M. (1997) Disassembly of multiple product structures. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 32(4), 949-961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, K., Gupta, S. M. and Brennan, L. (1997) Disassembly of complex products with parts and materials commonality. Production Planning and Control, 8(3), 255-269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veerakamolmal, P. and Gupta, S. M. (1998a) Design of an integrated component recovery system. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, Oak Brook, Illinois, 264-269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veerakamolmal, P. and Gupta, S. M. (1998b) High-mix/low-volume batch of electronic equipment disassembly. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 35(1–2), 65-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veerakamolmal, P. and Gupta, S. M. (1998c) Optimal analysis of lot size balancing for multi-products selective disassembly. International Journal of Flexible Automation and Integrated Manufacturing, 6(3/4), 245-269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veerakamolmal, P. and Gupta, S. M. (1999a) Analysis of design efficiency for the disassembly of modular electronic products. Journal of Electronics Manufacturing, 9(1), 79-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veerakamolmal, P. and Gupta, S. M. (1999b) Automating multiple products disassembly process planning with case-based reasoning. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Operations and Quantitative Management, Ahmedabad, India, January 3–6, pp. 24-33.

  • Veerakamolmal, P., Gupta, S. M. and McLean C. R. (1997) Disassembly process planning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design and Automation, Bangkok, Thailand, March 18–21, pp. 162-165.

  • Watson, I. (1997) Applying Case-Based Reasoning: Techniques for enterprise systems, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeid, I., Gupta, S. M. and Bardasz, T. (1997) A case-based reasoning approach to planning for disassembly. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 8, 97-106.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Veerakamolmal, P., Gupta, S.M. A case-based reasoning approach for automating disassembly process planning. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 13, 47–60 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013629013031

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013629013031

Navigation