Abstract
This paper presents details of the methodology developed by the United Kingdom's Environmental Change Network for the long-term monitoring of macrophytes in rivers and streams. The methodology is based on techniques first proposed by the Standing Committee of Analysts (1987) and later adapted by the National Rivers Authority (NRA) and Environment Agency, but differs in splitting the surveyed 100 m stretch of waterinto sections to provide an objective measure of the frequencyof occurrence of individual species in place of the moresubjective estimation of cover. A pilot study of the ECN methodology took place at five sitesin 1997. The results of this study, including a few practicaldifficulties in the application of the methodology, are presented and discussed. For all but one of the sites strongassociations were found between the number of species observedand the physical characteristics of the watercourse. The most important characteristics were degree of shading, substrate type, depth and clarity. The frequency of occurrence of individual species within sections of the watercourse was foundto be strongly related to the log of the overall estimates of cover. Because the use of sections, rather than a single overall coverestimate, enables variation in the pattern of vegetation over surveyed stretches to be detected and related to watercourse characteristics, the precision with which change can be detected is increased, and the possibility of determining the causes of change is thereby enhanced. Moreover the use of sections allows within-site variation to be calculated and hence the accuracy of estimated changes to be quantified.In general implementation of the ECN methodology was not found to be particularly onerous or difficult. As a result of the pilot study some changes in the ECN methodology have been made, primarily to reduce the workload so that sites can be surveyed comfortably in a single day.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AFRC: 1991, Rothamsted Experimental Station Guide to the Classical Field Experiments, Harpenden: AFRC.
Ali, M. M., Murphy, K. J. and Abernethy, V. J.: 1999, ‘Macrophyte functional variables versus species assemblages as predictors of trophic status in flowing waters’, Hydrobiol. 415, 131–138.
Boon, P. J., Holmes, N. T. H, Maitland, P. S., Rowell, T. A. and Davies, J.: 1997, ‘A System for Evaluating Rivers for Conservation (‘sERCON’): Development, Structure and Function’, in P. J. Boon and D. L. Howell (eds), Freshwater Quality: Defining the Indefinable?, HMSO: Edinburgh.
Burt, T. P.: 1994, ‘Long-term study of the natural environment – perceptive science or mindless monitoring?’ Progr. Phys. Geo. 18(4), 475–596.
Butcher, R. W.: 1933, ‘Studies on the ecology of rivers: I. On the distribution of macrophytic vegetation in the rivers of Britain’, J. Ecol. 21, 58–91.
Canfield, D. E. and Hoyer,M. V.: 1988, ‘Influence of nutrient enrichment and light availability on the abundance of aquatic macrophytes in Florida streams’, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45, 1467–1472.
Carr, G. M.: 1996, ‘The Role of Phosphorus and Nitrogen in Regulating the Growth of Rooted Macrophytes in Prairie Rivers’, M. Sc. thesis, University of Alberta.
Carr, G. M., Duthie, H. C., Taylor, W. D.: 1997, ‘Models of aquatic plant productivity: a review of the factors that influence growth’, Aqua. Bot. 59, 195–215.
Casey, H. and Westlake, D.F.: 1974, ‘Growth and Nutrient Relationships of Macrophytes in Sydling Water, a Small Unpolluted Chalk Stream’, in Proceedings of the European Weed Research Society, 4th International Symposium on Aquatic Weeds, Vienna, Austria.
Chambers, P. A., Prepas, E. E., Hamilton, H. R. and Bothwell, M. L.: 1991, ‘Current velocity and its effect on aquatic macrophytes in flowing waters’, Ecol. Appl. 1, 249–257.
Dawson, F. H. and Kern-Hansen, U.: 1978, ‘Aquatic weed management in natural streams: the effects of shade by the marginal vegetation’, Proc. Int. Assoc. Theo. Appl. Limnol. 20, 1451–1456.
Dawson, F. H. and Kern-Hansen, U.: 1979, ‘The effects of natural and artificial shade on the macrophytes of lowland streams and the use of shade as a management technique’, Int. Rev. Gesamten Hydrobiol. 64, 437–455.
Devenish, M.: 1986, The United Kingdom Precipitation Monitoring Network, Warren Spring Laboratory: Stevenage. LR 561 (AP).
Environment Agency: 1996, ‘Methodology for the Assessment of Freshwater Riverine Macrophytes for the Purposes of the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive’ (UWWTD), EA.
Environment Agency.: 1998, River Habitat Quality: River Habitat Survey Report No 2, EA.
Harper, D. M.: 1986, ‘The effects of artificial enrichment upon the planktonic and benthic communities in a mesotrophic loch series in lowland Scotland’, Hydrobiol. 137, 9–19.
Holmes, N.: 1983, Typing Rivers, According to their Flora. Focus on Nature Conservation No 4, NCC: Peterborough.
Holmes, N. and Whitton, B.A.: 1977, ‘Macrophyte vegetation of the River Swale, Yorkshire’, Freshw. Biol. 7, 545–558.
Johnston, A. E.: 1991, ‘Benefits from Long-Term Ecosystem Research’ in P.G. Risser (ed.), Long-Term Ecological Research: an International Perspective, Wiley: Chichester, pp. 89–114.
Kelly, M. G. and Whitton, B. A.: 1998, ‘Biological monitoring of eutrophication in rivers’, Hydrobiol. 384, 55–67.
Lehmann, A. and Lachavanne, J. B.: 1999, ‘Changes in the water quality of Lake Geneva indicated by submerged macrophytes’, Freshw. Biol. 42(3), 457–466.
Leigh, R. A. and Johnston, A. E. (eds).: 1994, Long-term Experiments in Agricultural and Ecological Sciences, CAB International: Wallingford.
National Rivers Authority (Anglian Region).: 1994, ‘Standard Methodologies: Assessment of Freshwater Riverine Environments using Macrophytes’, (Final Draft), NRA.
National Rivers Authority (Anglian Region): 1996, ‘Standard Methodologies: Assessment of Freshwater Riverine Environments using Macrophytes Project Report’, NRA.
National Rivers Authority: 1995, ‘River Habitat Survey: Field Methodology Guidance Manual’, NRA.
Nature Conservancy Council: 1989, Guidelines for the Selection of Biological SSSIs, NCC: Peterborough.
Pain, R. T.: 1986, ‘Benthic community – water column coupling during the 1982–1983 El Nino’, Are community changes at high latitudes attributable to cause or coincidence? Limonol. Oceano. 31, 351–360.
Patrick, S., Waters, D., Juggins, S. and Jenkins, A.: 1991, United Kingdom Acid Waters Monitoring Network: Site Descriptions and Methodology Report, ENSIS Ltd, University College: London.
Pearsall, W.H.: 1921, ‘The development of vegetation in the English Lakes’, J. Ecol. 6, 259–284.
Rodwell, J. S., Sykes, J. M. and Helps, M. B.: 1996, ‘Vegetation Protocol’, in J. M. Sykes and A. M. J. Lane (eds), The United Kingdom Environmental Change Network: Protocols for Standard Measurements at Terrestrial Sites. The Stationery Office: London.
Sayer, C., Roberts, N., Sadler, J., David, C. and Wade, P.M.: 1999, ‘Biodiversity changes in a shallow lake ecosystem: a multi-proxy palaeolimnological analysis’, J. Biogeo. 26(1), 97–114.
Spence, D. H. N.: 1967, ‘Factors controlling the distribution of freshwater macrophytes with particular reference to the lochs of Scotland’, J. Ecol. 55, 147–170.
Standing Committee of Analysts.: 1987, Methods for the Use of Aquatic Macrophytes for Assessing Water Quality 1985–86. HMSO: London.
Sykes, J. M., Horrill, A. D. and Mountford, M. D.: 1983, ‘Use of visual cover assessments as quantitative estimators of some british woodland taxa’, J. Ecol. 71(2), 437–450.
Sykes, J. M, and Lane, A. M. J. (eds.): 1996, The United Kingdom Environmental Change Network: Protocols for Standard Measurements at Terrestrial Sites. The Stationery Office: London.
Sykes J. M, Lane, A. M. J. and George D. G. (eds): 1999, The United Kingdom Environmental Change Network: Protocols for Standard Measurements at Freshwater Sites. Abbots Ripton: Institute of Terrestrial Ecology.
Thiebaut, G. and Muller, S.: 1999, ‘A macrophyte communities sequence as an indicator of eutrophication and acidification levels in weakly mineralised streams in north-eastern France’, Hydrobiol. 410, 17–24.
Tremp, H. and Kohler, A.: 1995, ‘The usefulness of macrophyte monitoring-systems, exemplified on eutrophication and acidification of running waters’, Acta Bot. Gall. 142(6), 541–550.
Whitton, B. A., Boulton, P. N. G., Clegg, E. M., Gemmell, J. J., Graham, G. G., Gustar, R. and Moorhouse, T. P.: 1998, ‘Long-term changes in macrophytes of British rivers: 1. River Wear’, Sci. Tot. Environ. 210–211, 411–426.
Woiwod, I. P. and Harrington, R.: 1994, ‘Flying in the Face of Change: the Rothamsted Insect Survey’, in R. A. Leigh and A. E. Johnston (eds), Long-term Experiments in Agricultural and Ecological Sciences, pp. 321–342, CAB International: Wallingford.
Wolfe-Murphy, S. A. Lawrie, E. A. Smith, S. J. and Gibson, C. E.: 1991, ‘Survey Methodologies: Data Collection Techniques’, Northern Ireland Lakes Survey report.
Wong, S. L. and Clark, B.: 1976, ‘Field determination of the critical nutrient concentrations for Cladophora in streams’, J. Fish Res. Board Can. 33, 85–92.
Wright, R. M. and McDonnell, A. J.: 1986a, ‘Macrophyte growth in shallow streams: field investigations’, J. Environ. Eng. 112, 953–966.
Wright, R. M. and McDonnell, A. J.: 1986b, ‘Macrophyte growth in shallow streams: field investigations’, J. Environ. Eng. 112, 967–981.
Ziefert, D. V., Rudakov, K. M. and Petrov, S. S.: 1991, ‘Effect of industrial and municipal wastes on the composition of higher aquatic plants in the middle channel of the Belays River’, Soviet J. Ecol. 22, 21–26.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scott, W.A., Adamson, J.K., Rollinson, J. et al. Monitoring of Aquatic Macrophytes for Detection of Long-term Change in River Systems. Environ Monit Assess 73, 131–153 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013023501051
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013023501051