Abstract
For many years, children receiving many liking nominations have been considered ‘popular’ in the sociometric literature. Recently, doubts have arisen that perhaps students' and teachers' notion of popularity involves social status and dominance rather than personal liking. It is argued in this paper that sociometric nominations of personal liking represent attractiveness for intimate friendship, whereas popularity should be measured directly via judgmental sociometry, in which children nominate directly the popular students and are not requested to express their personal feelings. Nominations of attractiveness, collected in conventional affective sociometry, were compared in six samples (153 classrooms) to direct judgments of popularity. Attractiveness and popularity were found to be distinct psychological constructs: (a) the average correlation between these nominations was only r = 0.44, and in most classrooms (72%) the same child did not receive the highest number of nominations for attractiveness and popularity; (b) a substantial proportion of students were highly popular but only moderately attractive or vice versa (21.5%), whereas only 9% were high in both attributes; (c) in terms of classroom climate and perceptions of classroom processes, popular students were less satisfied than attractive students, and were more critical of the learning climate and of their teachers' differential teaching behavior toward low- and high-achievers; and (d) differences between popular and attractive students were found in several attributes and aspects of self-esteem. These findings lead to the conclusion that the use of ‘popular’ in the Coie, Dodge, and Coppotelli (1982) two-dimensional model and the ensuing sociometric literature have been erroneous and lacking in ecological validity. Popularity should be measured directly via judgmental sociometry rather than be inferred from affective liking nominations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asher, Steven & Coie, John (Eds.) (1990). Peer rejection in childhood. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Asher, Steven & Dodge, Kenneth (1986). Identifying children who are rejected by their peers. Developmental Psychology, 22, 444-449.
Asher, Steven & Hymel, Shelley (1981). Children's social competence in peer relations: Sociometric and behavioral assessment. In Wine J. & Smye M. (Eds.), Social competence. NY: Guilford, pp. 125-157.
Babad, Elisha (1974). A multi-method approach to the assessment of humor: A critical look at humor tests. Journal of Personality, 42, 618-631.
Babad, Elisha (1990a). Measuring and changing teachers' differential behavior as perceived by students and teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 683-690.
Babad, Elisha (1990b). Calling on students: How a teacher's behavior can acquire different meanings in students' minds. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 25, 1-4.
Babad, Elisha (1993). Teachers' differential behavior. Educational Psychology Review, 5, 347-376.
Babad, Elisha (1995). The ‘teacher's pet’ phenomenon, students' perceptions of teachers' differential behavior, and students' morale. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 361-374.
Babad, Elisha (1998). Preferential affect: The crux of the teacher expectancy issue. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Expectations in the classroom. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 183-214.
Babad, Elisha & Ezer, Harel (1993). Seating locations of sociometrically measured student types: Methodological and substantive issues. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 75-87.
Bell-Dolan, Debora, Foster, Sharon, & Christopher, Jeanette (1992). Children's reactions to participating in a peer-relations study: An example of cost-effective assessment. Child Study Journal, 22, 137-156.
Bell-Dolan, Debora, Foster, Sharon, & Sikora, Darryn (1989). Effects of sociometric testing on children's behavior and loneliness in school. Developmental Psychology, 25, 306-311.
Berndt, Thomas & Ladd, Gary (Eds.) (1989). Peer relationships in child development. NY: Wiley.
Bjerstedt, Ake (1956). Interpretations of sociometric choice status. Lund: Hakan Ohlssons Boktryckeri.
Borgatta, Edgar (1960). Analysis of social interaction and sociometric perception. In Jacob Moreno (Ed.), The sociometry reader. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press, pp. 272-297.
Bronfenbrenner, Uri (1945). The measurement of sociometric status, structure and development. Sociometry Monographs, 6, 1-80.
Bukowski, William & Cillessen, Antonius (Eds.) (1998). Sociometry then and now: Building on six decades of measuring children's experiences with the peer group. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Bukowski, William & Hoza, Betsy (1989). Popularity and friendship: Issues in theory, measurement, and outcome. In T. Berndt & G. Ladd (Eds.), Peer relationships in child development. NY: Wiley, pp. 15-45.
Butcher, Janice (1986). Longitudinal analysis of adolescent girls' aspirations at school and perceptions of popularity. Adolescence, 11, 133-143.
Cairns, Robert (1983). Sociometry, psychometry, and social structure: A commentary on six recent studies of popular, rejected, and neglected children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 429-438.
Cairns, Robert & Cairns, Beverly (1994). Lifelines and risks: Pathways of youth in our time. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Cairns, Robert, Xie, Hongling, & Leung, Man-Chi (1998). The popularity of friendship and the neglect of social networks: Toward a new balance. In W. Bukowski & A. Cillessen (Eds.), Sociometry then and now: Building on six decades of measuring children's experiences with the peer group. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, pp. 25-53.
Chavez, Rudolfo (1984). The use of high-inference measures to study classroom climates: A review. Review of Educational Research, 54, 237-261.
Coie, John & Dodge, Kenneth (1983). Continuities and changes in children's social status: A five-year longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29, 261-282.
Coie, John, Dodge, Kenneth, & Coppotelli, Heide (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557-571.
Cooper, Harris & Good, Tom (1983). Pygmalion grows up. New York: Longman.
Coopersmith, Stanley (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco: Freeman.
Criswell, Joan (1960). Foundations of sociometric measurement. In J. Moreno (Ed.), The sociometry reader. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press, pp. 205-211.
Diehl, Daniel, Lemerise, Elizabeth, Caverly, Sarah, Ramsay, Shula, & Roberts, Julia (1998). Peer relations and school adjustment in ungraded primary children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 506-515.
Dunnington, Margaret (1957). Behavioral differences in sociometric status groups in a nursery school. Child Development, 28, 103-111.
Eder, Donna (1985). The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescents. Sociology of Education, 58, 154-165.
Eder, Donna & Kinney, David (1995). The effect of middle school extracurricular activities on adolescents' popularity and peer status. Youth and Society, 26, 298-324.
Evans, Kathleen (1962). Sociometry and education. London: Routledge & Kegan-Paul.
Fitts, William (1964). Tennessee self-concept scale: Test booklet. Nashville TN: Counsler Recordings and Tests.
Foster, Sharon & Ritchey, Wendy (1979). Issues in the assessment of social competence in children. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 12, 625-638.
Fraser, Barry (1986). Classroom environment. London: Croom Helm.
Fraser, Barry (1989). Twenty years of classroom environment research: Progress and prospect. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21, 307-327.
Fraser, Barry & Walberg, Herbert (Eds.) (1991). Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents, and consequences. New York: Pergamon Press.
Furman, Wyndol & Robbins, Philip (1985). What's the point? Issues in the selection of treatment objectives. In B. Schneider, K. Rubin & J. Ledingham (Eds.), Children's peer relations: Issues in assessment and intervention. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 41-54.
Gronlund, Norman (1959). Sociometry in the classroom.NewYork: Harper.
Harter, Susan (1985). The self-perception profile for children. Denver, CO: University of Denver.
Hayvren, Maureen & Hymel, Shelley (1984). Ethical issues in sociometric testing: Impact of sociometric measures on interaction behavior. Developmental Psychology, 20, 844-849.
Iverson, Annette, Barton, Elizabeth, & Iverson, Grant (1997). Analysis of risk to children in a sociometric task. Developmental Psychology, 33, 104-112.
LaFontana, Kathryn & Cillessen, Antonius (1998). The nature of children's stereotypes of popularity. Social Development, 7, 301-320.
Lindzey, Gardner & Borgatta, Edgar (1954). Sociometric measurement. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 405-448.
Loomis, Charles & Pepinsky, Harold (1949). Sociometry, 1937–1947: Theory and methods. Sociometry Monographs, 20, 3-27.
Luthar, Suniya & McMahon, Thomas (1996). Peer reputation among inner-city adolescents: Structure and correlates. Journal of Research in Adolescence, 6, 581-603.
Marsh, Herbert & Richards, Gary (1988). The Tennessee self-concept scales: Reliability, internal structure, and construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 612-624.
Moreno, Jacob (1934). Who shall survive? NY: Beacon House.
Moreno, Jacob (1943). Sociometry in the classroom. Sociometry, 6, 425-428.
Moreno, Jacob (Ed.) (1960). The sociometry reader. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Mouton, Jane, Blake, Robert, & Fruchter, Benjamin (1960). The validity of sociometric responses. In J. Moreno (Ed.), The sociometry reader. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press, pp. 362-387.
Newcomb, Andrew & Bukowski, William (1983). Social impact and social preference as determinants of children's peer group status. Developmental Psychology, 19, 856-867.
Newcomb, Andrew, Bukowski, William, & Pattee, Linda (1993). Children's peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99-128.
Northway, Mary (1947). A review of the Toronto studies. Sociometry Monographs, 11, 5-13.
Northway, Mary, Frankel, Esther, & Potashin, Reva (Eds.), (1947). Personality and sociometric status. Sociometry Monographs, 11, 5-73.
Parkhurst, Jennifer & Asher, Steven (1992). Peer rejection in middle school: Subgroup differences in behavior, loneliness, and interpersonal concerns. Developmental Psychology, 28, 231-241.
Parkhurst, Jennifer & Hopmeyer, Andrea (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolscence, 18, 125-144.
Peery, J. Craig (1979). Popular, amiable, isolated, rejected: A reconceptualization of sociometric status in preschool children. Child Development, 50, 1231-1234.
Potashin, Reva (1947). A sociometric study of children's friendships. Sociometry Monographs, 11, 31-53.
Ratiner, C., Weissberg, R., & Caplan, M. (1986, August). Ethical considerations in sociometric testing: The reactions of preadolescent subject. Paper presented at the 94th Annual Meeting of the APA, Washington, DC.
Rienks, Shauna (1995). Classroom sociometry and its connection to classroom climate and students' self-concept. Unpublished B.A. Thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, N.J.
Rodkin, Philip, Farmer, Thomas, Pearl, Ruth, & Van Acker, Richard (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36, 14-24.
Sabongui, Amir, Bukowski, William, & Newcomb, Andrew (1998). The peer ecology of popularity: The network embeddedness of a child's friend predicts the child's subsequent popularity. In W. Bukowski & A. Cillessen (Eds.), Sociometry then and now: Building on six decades of measuring children's experiences with the peer group. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, pp. 83-91.
Tagiuri, Renato (1960). Perceptual sociometry: Introduction. In J. Moreno (Ed.), The sociometry reader. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press, pp. 568-578.
Tal, Zohar & Babad, Elisha (1990). The teacher's pet phenomenon: Rate of occurrence, correlates, and psychological costs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 637-645.
Weinstein, Rhona & McKown, Clark (1988). Expectancy effects in ‘context’: Listening to the voices of students and teachers. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 7): Expectations in the classroom. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 215-242.
Wherry, Robert & Fryer, Douglas (1949). Buddy ratings: Popularity contest of leadership criteria? Personnel Psychology, 2, 147-159.
Wylie, Ruth (1989). Measures of self-concept. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Babad, E. On the conception and measurement of popularity: more facts and some straight conclusions. Social Psychology of Education 5, 3–29 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012780232587
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012780232587