Skip to main content
Log in

On the Choice Between the Stocking Rate and Time in Range Management

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A long standing question in range management concerns the relative importance of the stocking rate versus the length oftime during which animals graze a particular rangeland. Weaddress this question by analyzing the problem faced by a privaterancher who wishes to minimize the long run expected net unit cost (LRENC) from range operations by choosing either the stocking rate or the length of time during which his animals graze hisrangeland. We construct a renewal-theoretic model and show that,in general, this rancher's LRENC with an optimally chosen stocking rate is lower than his LRENC with an optimally chosen grazing cycle length. From a management perspective, this means that correct stocking of the range is more important than the length of time during which animals graze the range. In addition, our research shows how to address questions concerning the desirability of temporal versus non-temporal controls in managing naturalresources such as fisheries and hunting grounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Arrow, K. J. and S. S. L. Chang (1980), ‘Optimal Pricing, Use, and Exploration of Uncertain Natural Resource Stocks’, in P. T. Liu, ed., Dynamic Optimization and Mathematical Economics. New York, NY, USA: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batabyal, A. A. (1995), ‘Leading Issues in Domestic EnvironmentalRegulation: A Review Essay’, Ecological Economics 12, 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batabyal, A. A. (1999), ‘Aspectsof the Optimal Management of Cyclical Ecological-Economic Systems’, Ecological Economics 30, 285–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batabyal, A. A. and H. Beladi (2000a), ‘Aspects of the Theory of Financial Risk Management forNatural Disasters’, Applied Mathematics Letters, Forthcoming.

  • Batabyal, A. A. and H. Beladi (2000b),‘Time Restrictions in Natural Resource Management: A Dynamic and Stochastic Analysis’, Unpublished Manuscript. Rochester Institute of Technology.

  • Goodloe, S. (1969), ‘Short Duration Grazing in Rhodesia’,Journal of Range Management 22, 369–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, K. T., L. A. Torell and C. D. Allison(1992), ‘Costs and Benefits of Implementing Holistic Resource Management on New Mexico Ranches’, New Mexico Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 672.

  • Hall, L. M., M. R. George, D. D. McCreary and T.E. Adams (1992), ‘Effects of Cattle Grazing on Blue Oak Seedling Damage and Survival’, Journal of Range Management 45, 503–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R. H., M. J. Samuel, P. S. Test and M. A. Smith (1988),‘Cattle Vegetation and Economic Responses to Grazing Systems and Grazing Pressure’, Journal of Range Management 41, 282–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R. H., S. Clapp and P. S. Test (1993), ‘Grazing Strategies,Stocking Rates and Frequency Intensity of Grazing on Western Wheatgrass and Blue Grama’, Journal of Range Management 46, 122–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holechek, J. L., R. D. Pieper and C. H. Herbel (1998), RangeManagement, 3rd edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holechek, J. L., M. Thomas, F. Molinar and D. Galt (1999), ‘Stocking Desert Rangelands: What We've Learned’, Rangelands 21, 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangel, M. (1985), Decision and Control in Uncertain Resource Systems. Orlando, FL,USA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCreary, D. D. and J. Tecklin (1993), ‘Tree Shells Accelerate Valley OakRestoration on Grazed Rangelands (California)’, Restoration and Management Notes 11, 152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E. C. (1977), Mathematical Ecology. New York, NY, USA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. andM. Spence (1976), ‘Effluent Charges and Licenses Under Uncertainty’, Journal of Public Economics 5, 193–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. M. (1996), Stochastic Processes, 2nd edn. New York, NY, USA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. M. (1997), Introduction to Probability Models, 6th edn. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savory, A. (1983), ‘The Savory Grazing Method or Holistic Resource Management’, Rangelands 5, 155–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savory, A. (1988), Holistic Resource Management. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savory, A. and S. D. Parsons (1980), ‘The Savory Grazing Method’, Rangelands 2,234–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savory, A. and J. Butterfield (1999), Holistic Management, 2nd edn. Washington,DC, USA: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddart, L. A., A. D. Smith and T. W. Box (1975), Range Management, 3rdedn. New York, NY, USA: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, H.M. and S. Karlin (1998), An Introduction toStochastic Modeling, 3rd edn. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhler, R. S. and P.G. Bradley (1970), ‘A Stochastic Model for Determining the Economic Prospects of Petroleum Exploration Over Large Regions’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 65, 623–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M. L.(1978), ‘Optimal Rewards for Economic Regulation’, American Economic Review 68, 683–691.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Batabyal, A.A., Biswas, B. & Godfrey, E.B. On the Choice Between the Stocking Rate and Time in Range Management. Environmental and Resource Economics 20, 211–223 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012647003818

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012647003818

Navigation