Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the LKC stimulator for focal ERG testing

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated the ability of focal ERGs to diagnose abnormally functioning maculae in the absence of funduscopic and angiographic signs, as well as to confirm diagnoses of clinically suspected macular disease. We present normative data on the second commercially available focal ERG stimulator (FCS-500, LKC Technologies), which may be added to the standard full field ERG systems currently used in many laboratories. The stimulator uses a monocular indirect ophthalmoscope to present a 5° white stimulus flickering at 31.25 Hz in a 20° background field. We have established a range of normal amplitudes (747–3000 nV) and implicit times (30.5–37.5 ms) for the instrument based on tests of 45 eyes of 45 normal patients. To confirm the validity of this test for diagnosis of ocular dysfunction we compared these normals to 46 eyes of 46 patients with macular disease and decreased acuity, and to 49 eyes of 49 patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Using Focal ERG amplitude alone, we found overall accuracy of 85% in diagnosing macular disease associated with decreased acuity. These findings confirm the validity and efficacy of the system we have evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Miyake Y, Ichikawa K, Shiose Y, Kawase Y. Hereditary macular dystrophy without visible fundus abnormality. Am J Ophthalmol 1989; 108(3): 292–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fish GE, Birch DG, Fuller DG, Straach R Fish. A comparison of visual function tests in eyes with maculopathy. Ophthalmology 1986; 93(9): 1177–82.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Matthews GP, Sandberg MA, Berson EL. Foveal cone electroretinograms in patients with central visual loss of unexplained etiology. Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110(11): 1568–70.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jacobson SG, Sandberg MA, Effron MH, Berson EL. Foveal cone electroretinograms in strabismic amblyopia: comparison with juvenile macular degeneration, macular scars, and optic atrophy. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1979; 99(3): 353–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fish GE, Birch DG. The focal electroretinogram in the clinical assessment of macular disease. Ophthalmology 1989; 96(1): 109–14.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Biersdorf WR. The clinical utility of the foveal electroretinogram: a review. Doc Ophthalmol 1989; 73(4): 313–25.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Weiner A, Sandberg MA. Normal change in the foveal cone ERG with increasing duration of light exposure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991; 32(10): 2842–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Severns M, Johnson M, Merritt S. Automated estimation of implicit time and amplitude from the flicker electroretinogram. Appl Opt 1991; 30: 2106–2112.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marmor M, Zrenner E. Standard for clinical electroretinography (1994 update). Doc Ophthalmol 1995 89(3): 199–210.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lyons, J.S., Sapper, D.J. Evaluation of the LKC stimulator for focal ERG testing. Doc Ophthalmol 103, 163–173 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012421111342

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012421111342

Navigation