Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting writing skill development with word recognition and preschool readiness skills

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this longitudinal study, the writing skill development of154 Finnish-speaking children was followed from preschool to thethird grade. The focus was on predictive associations betweenpreschool writing readiness skills and later mechanics ofwriting, as well as between word recognition skill, mechanics ofwriting, and composition coherence. In addition, comparisons weremade between boys and girls to see to what extent writing skilldevelopment is gender-specific. Multi-group structural equationmodeling was used for statistical analysis. The results indicatedthat both mechanics of writing and composition coherence could bepredicted from performance on the same skill at an earlier pointin time. Preschool measures of phonological and visual-motorskills predicted later mechanics of writing. Word recognitionworked as a predictor of later mechanics of writing andcomposition coherence, but only starting from second grade, whenthe development of the word recognition skill had becomestabilized at a high enough level. Furthermore, first grademechanics of writing predicted second grade compositioncoherence, but only at this early stage of productive writingwhen there were still difficulties in the mechanics of writing.Girls were better at tasks measuring mechanics of writing andwrote more coherent stories than boys. The gender difference inthe mechanics of writing at the first grade level was explainedby the presented model. Educational implications were discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, R.D. & Berninger, V.W. (1993). Structural equation modeling of relationships among developmental skills and writing skills in primary and intermediate grade writers, Journal of Educational Psychology 85: 478-508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, E. & Blachman, B. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling? Reading Research Quarterly 26: 49-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V.W. & Fuller, F. (1992). Gender differences in orthographic, verbal, and compositional fluency: Implications for assessing writing disabilities in primary grade children, Journal of School Psychology 30: 363-382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V.W., Cartwright, A.C., Yates, C.M., Swanson, H.L.& Abbott, R.D. (1994). Developmental skills related to writing and reading acquisition in the intermediate grades: Shared and unique functional systems, Reading and Writing 6: 161-196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V., Whitaker, D., Feng, Y., Swanson, H.L. & Abbott, R.D. (1996). Assessment of planning, translating, and revising in junior high writers, Journal of School Psychology 34: 23-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland, T. (1993). The importance of being literate: Reading development in primary school and its consequences for the school career in secondary education, European Journal of Psychology of Education 8: 289-305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L. & Bryant, P. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read — a causal connection, Nature 301: 419-421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M.W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1993). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children: A 1-year follow-up, Journal of Educational Psychology 85: 104-111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, C.A., Lee, K., Webster, S., Munro, K., Hunt, A.K. & Linton, M. (1995). Text cohesion in children's narrative writing, Applied Psycholinguistics 16: 257-269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castle, J.M., Riach, J. & Nicholson, T. (1994). Getting off to a better start in reading and spelling: The effects of phonemic awareness instruction within a whole language program, Journal of Educational Psychology 86: 350-359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormier, P. & Dea, S. (1997). Distinctive patterns of relationship of phonological awareness and working memory with reading development, Reading and Writing 9: 207-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englehard, G., Walker, E.V., Gordon, B. & Gabrielson, S. (1994). Writing tasks and gender: Influences on writing quality of black and white students, Journal of Educational Research 87: 197-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, H. (1994). Literacy development in the first school–what advice? British Journal of Educational Psychology 64: 29-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (1990). The role of production factors in learning disabled students' compositions, Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 781-791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., Berninger, V.W., Abbott, R.D., Abbott, S.P. & Whitaker, D. (1997). Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach, Journal of Educational Psychology 89: 170-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatcher, P.J., Hulme, C. & Ellis, A.W. (1994). Ameliorating early reading failure by integrating the teaching of reading and phonological skills: The phonological linkage hypotheses, Child Development 65: 41-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J.R., Flower, L., Schriver, K.A., Stratman, J.F. & Carey, L. (1987). Cognitive processes in revision. In S. Rosenberg (ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics: Vol. 2 (pp. 176-240). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J.R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C.M. Levy & S. Ransdell (eds.), The science of writing. Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1-27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, S.R., Swartz, C.W., Montgomery, J.W., Reed, M.S., Brown, T.T., Wasileski, T.J. & Levine, M.D. (1993). Prevalence of writing problems across three middle school samples, School Psychology Review 22: 610-622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades, Journal of Educational Psychology 80: 437-447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juel, C., Griffith, P.L. & Gough, P.B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade, Journal of Educational Psychology 78: 243-255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8.14 and PRELIS 2.14. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, R.T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In C.M. Levy & S. Ransdell (eds.), The science of writing. Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 57-71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnunen, R., Vauras, M. & Niemi, P. (1998) Comprehension monitoring in beginning readers, Scientific Studies of Reading 2: 353-375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, W., McCarthy, J. & Kirk, W. (1968). Illinois test of psycholinguistic abilities, revised edition. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klicpera, C. & Schabmann, A. (1993). Do German-speaking children have a chance to overcome reading and spelling difficulties? A longitudinal survey from the second until the eighth grade, European Journal of Psychology of Education 8: 307-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudson, R.E. (1992). Development and application of a writing attitude survey for grades 1 to 3, Psychological Reports 70: 711-720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, I., Frost, J. & Petersen, O-P. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children, Reading Research Quarterly 23: 263-284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matilainen, K. (1989). Kirjoitustaidon kehittyminen neljän ensimmäisen kouluvuoden aikana [The development of writing skills during the first four school years]. University of Joensuu. Publications in Education 9.

  • Poskiparta, E., Niemi, P. & Vauras, M. (1999). Who benefits from training in linguistic awareness in the first grade and what components of it show training effects? Journal of Learning Disabilities 32: 437-446, 456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijlaarsdam, G. & van den Bergh, H. (1996). The dynamics of composing — An agenda for research into an interactive compensatory model of writing: Many questions, some answers. In C.M. Levy & S. Ransdell (eds.), The science of writing. Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 107-125). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, A.D., Watson, T.E., Footo, M., Levine, M.D., Coleman, W.L. & Hooper, S.R. (1992). Neurodevelopmental study of writing disorders in middle childhood, Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics 13: 17-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1987). Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition. In S. Rosenberg (ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics: Vol. 2 (pp. 143-175). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scinto, L.F.M. (1986). Written language and psychological development. Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W. & Näslund, J.C. (1993). The impact of early metalinguistic competencies and memory capacity on reading and spelling in elementary school: Results of the Munich Longitudinal Study on the Genesis of Individual Competencies (LOGIC), European Journal of Psychology of Education 8: 273-287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankweiler, D., Lundquist, E., Dreyer, L.G. & Dickinson, C.C. (1996). Reading and spelling difficulties in high school students: Causes and consequences, Reading and Writing 8: 267-294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smits, B.W., Mommers, M.J. & Aarnoutse, C.A. (1985). Geslachts–en leeftijdsverschillen bij het leren lezen en spellen. Een longitudinale studie, Pedagogische Studieen 62: 414-427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stage, S.A. & Wagner, R.K. (1992). Development of young children's phonological and orthohraphic knowledge as revealed by their spellings, Developmental Psychology 28: 287-296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K. & Rashotte, C.A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading, Journal of Learning Disabilities 27: 276-286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vauras, M., Hyönä, J. & Niemi, P. (1992). Comprehending coherent and incoherent texts: evidence from eye movement patterns and recall performance, Journal of Research in Reading 15: 39-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., Landerl, K., Linortner, R. & Hummer, P. (1991). The relationship of phonemic awareness to reading acquisition: More consequence than precondition but still important, Cognition 40: 219-249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarborough, B.H. & Johnson, R.A. (1989). Sex differences in written language among elementary pupils: A seven-year longitudinal study, Psychological Reports 64: 407-414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zutell, J. & Rasinski, T. (1989). Reading and spelling connections in third and fifth grade students, Reading Psychology 10: 137-155.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mäki, H.S., Voeten, M.J., Vauras, M.M. et al. Predicting writing skill development with word recognition and preschool readiness skills. Reading and Writing 14, 643–672 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012071514719

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012071514719

Navigation