Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mapping a forest mosaic – A comparison of vegetation and bird distributions using geographic boundary analysis

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many areas of ecological inquiry require the ability to detect and characterize change in ecological variables across both space and time. The purpose of this study was to investigate ways in which geographic boundary analysis techniques could be used to characterize the pattern of change over space in plant distributions in a forested wetland mosaic. With vegetation maps created using spatially constrained clustering and difference boundary delineation, we examined similarities between the identified boundaries in plant distributions and the occurrence of six species of songbirds. We found that vegetation boundaries were significantly cohesive, suggesting one or more crisp vegetation transition zones exist in the study site. Smaller, less cohesive boundary areas also provided important information about patterns of treefall gaps and dense patches of understory within the study area. Boundaries for songbird abundance were not cohesive, and bird and vegetation difference boundaries did not show significant overlap. However, bird boundaries did overlap significantly with vegetation cluster boundaries. Vegetation clusters delineated using constrained clustering techniques have the potential to be very useful for stratifying bird abundance data collected in different sections of the study site, which could be used to improve the efficiency of monitoring efforts for rare bird species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes, B. V. & Wagner, W. H., Jr. 1981. Michigan trees: A guide to the trees of Michigan and the Great Lakes Region. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beals, E. W. 1969. Vegetational changes along altitudinal gradients. Science 165:981-985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, R., McPeek, G. A. & Adams, R. J., Jr. 1991. The atlas of breeding birds of Michigan. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. G. 1998. Mapping historical forest types in Baraga County Michigan, USA as fuzzy sets. Plant Ecol. 134: 97-111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough, P. A. 1989. Fuzzy mathematical models for soil survey and land evaluation. J. Soil Sci. 40: 477-492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cali´nski, T. & Harabasz, J. 1974. A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Comm. Stat. 3: 1-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camarero, J. J., Gutiérrez, E. & Fortin, M.-J. 2000. Boundary detection in altitudinal treeline ecotones in the Spanish Central Pyrenees. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 32: 117-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, T. G., Harrison, D. J. & Katnik, D. D. 1998. Influence of landscape pattern on habitat use by American marten in an industrial forest. Conserv. Biol. 12: 1327-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, M. L. 1985. Habitat selection in birds. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edition. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S. L., James, F. C. & Risser, P. G. 1982. Habitat relationships of wood warblers (Parulidae) in northern central Minnesota. Oikos 39: 50-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csillag, F., Boots, B., Fortin, M.-J., Lowell, K. & Potvin, F. 2001. Multiscale characterization of boundaries and landscape ecological patterns. Geomatica, in press.

  • Fortin, M.-J. 1994. Edge detection algorithms for two dimensional ecological data. Ecology 75: 956-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, M.-J. 1997. Effects of data types on vegetation boundary delineation. Can. J. For. Res. 27: 1851-1858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, M.-J. 1999. Effects of quadrat size and data measurement on the detection of boundaries. J. Veg. Sci. 10: 43-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, M.-J. & Drapeau, P. 1995. Delineation of ecological boundaries: Comparison of approaches and significance tests. Oikos 72: 323-332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, M.-J., Drapeau, P. & Jacquez, G. M. 1996. Quantification of the spatial co-occurrences of ecological boundaries. Oikos 77: 51-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freemark, K. E., & Merriam, H. G. 1986. Importance of area and habitat heterogeneity to bird assemblages in temperate forest fragments. Biol. Conserv. 36: 115-141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, F. C. 1942. The bogs of northern Lower Michigan. Ecol. Mon. 12: 213-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, A. D. 1999. Classification. 2nd edition. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 82. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, K. R. 1996. Point counts of Michigan forest birds: Improving sampling efficiency for species of concern. Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A. J. & diCastri, F. (eds). 1992. Landscape boundaries: Consequences for biotic diversity and ecological flows. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R. J. & Mooney, H. A. (eds). 1990. Remote sensing of biosphere functioning. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquez, G. M. 1995. The map comparison problem: Tests for the overlap of geographic boundaries. Stat. Med. 14: 2343-2361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquez, G. M. & Maruca, S. 1998. Geographic boundary detection. In: Poiker, T. K. & Chrisman, N. (eds), Proceedings of the 8th internationational symposium on spatial data handling. International Geographical Union, Geographic Information Science Study Group, Burnaby, B.C., Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquez, G. M., Maruca, S. & Fortin, M.-J. 2000. From fields to objects: a review of geographic boundary analysis. J. Geogr. Sys. 2: 221-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, F. C. & Shugart, H. H., Jr. 1970. A quantitative method of habitat description. Audubon Field Notes 24: 727-736.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, F. C. & Wamer, N. O. 1982. Relationships between temperate forest bird communities and vegetation structure. Ecology 63: 159-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, C. A., Pastor, J., & Pinay, G. 1992. Quantitative methods for studying landscape boundaries. Pp. 107-125. In: Hansen, A. J. & diCastri, F. (eds), Landscape boundaries: Consequences for biotic diversity and ecological flows. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küchler, A. W. 1967. Vegetation mapping. The Ronald Press Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, L. & Legendre, P. 1983. Numerical Ecology. Developments in environmental modeling 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, P. 1987. Constrained clustering. Pp. 289-307. In: Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. (eds), Developments in numerical ecology. NATO ASI Series, Vol. G14, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, P., & Fortin, M.-J. 1989. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio 80: 107-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal, K. & McComb, W. C. 1995. Relationships between landscape structure and breeding birds in the Oregon coast range. Ecol. Monogr. 65: 235-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, G. W. & Cooper, M. C. 1985. An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika 50: 159-179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millington, A. C. & Alexander, R. W. 2000. Vegetation mapping in the last three decades of the twentieth century. Pp. 321-331. In: Alexander, R. & Millington, A. C. (eds), Vegetation mapping: From patch to planet. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musick, H. B. & Grover, H. D. 1991. Image textural measures as indices of landscape pattern. Pp. 77-103. In: Turner, M. G. & Gardner, R. H. (eds), Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oden, N. L., Sokal, R. R., Fortin, M.-J. & Goebl, H. 1993. Categorical wombling: detecting regions of significant change in spatially located categorical variables. Geogr. Anal. 25: 315-336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parody, J. M., Cuthbert, F. J. & Decker, E. H. In Press. The effect of 50 years of landscape change on species richness and community composition. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.

  • Parody, J. M. 1996. Avian assemblages in northern Michigan: A long-term perspective. Unpublished Master's Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quattrochi, D. A. & Pelletier, R. E. 1991. Remote sensing for analysis of landscapes: an introduction. Pp. 51-76. In: Turner, M. G. & Gardner, R. H. (eds), Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph, C. J. & Scott, J. M. (eds). 1981. Estimating the number of terrestrial birds. Studies in Avian Biol. 6.

  • Ralph, C. J., Geupel, G. R., Pyle, P., Martin, T. E. & DeSante, D. F. 1993. Handbook of field methods for monitoring landbirds. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-144. United States Department of Agriculture, United States Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheaffer, R. L., Mendenhall, W. & Ott, L. 1990. Elementary survey sampling, 4th Edition. PWS-Kent Publishing Company, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. G. 1977. Distribution of summer birds along a forest moisture gradient in an Ozark watershed. Ecology 58: 810-819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohlgren, T. J., Owen, A. J. & Lee, M. Monitoring shifts in plant diversity in response to climate change: a method for landscapes. Biod. Cons. 9: 65-86.

  • Turner, S. J., O'Neill, R. V., Conley, W., Conley, M. R. & Humphries, H. C. 1991. Pattern and scale: statistics for landscape ecology. Pp. 17-49. In: Turner, M. G. & Gardner, R. H. (eds), Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. G. & Gardner, R. H. (eds). 1991. Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verner, J. 1985. Assessment of counting techniques. Pp. 247-302. In: Johnston, R. F. (ed.), Current ornithology, Vol. 2. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villard, M.-A., Schmidt, E. V. & Maurer, B. A. 1998. Contribution of spatial modeling to avian conservation. Pp. 49-64. In: Marzluff, J. M. & Sallabanks, R. (eds), Avian conservation: research and management. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, P. S. & Pickett, S. T. A. 1985. Natural disturbance and patch dynamics: An introduction. Pp. 3-13. In: Pickett, S. T. A & White, P. S. (eds), The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J. A., Crawford, C. S. & Gosz, J. R. 1985. Boundary dynamics: a conceptual framework for studying landscape ecosystems. Oikos 45: 421-427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J. A. 1995. Landscape mosaics and ecological theory. Pp. 1-26. In: Hansson, L., Fahrig, L. & Merriam, G. (eds), Mosaic landscapes and ecological processes. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womble, W. H. 1951. Differential systematics. Science 114: 315-322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zogg, G. P. & B. V. Barnes. 1995. Ecological classification and analysis of wetland ecosystems, northern Lower Michigan, U.S.A. Can. J. For. Res. 25: 1865-1875.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Natural Resources & Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1115, USA

    Kimberly R. Hall

  2. BioMedware, Inc., 516 North State Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48104-1236, USA

    Susan L. Maruca

Authors
  1. Kimberly R. Hall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susan L. Maruca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hall, K.R., Maruca, S.L. Mapping a forest mosaic – A comparison of vegetation and bird distributions using geographic boundary analysis. Plant Ecology 156, 105–120 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011905124393

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011905124393

Search

Navigation