Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Hierarchical patch delineation in fragmented landscapes

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We developed a tool, FragPatch (FP), to delineate habitat patches for highly fragmented landscapes from a user-defined suitability map and two landscape perception values for a species of interest.

Methods

We wrote a Python script in ArcGIS to delineate habitat patch networks using the user inputs and ArcGIS tools such as Euclidean distance, focal maximum, and reclassify. We validated the tool from mapped locations of urban deer and classified imagery for Syracuse, New York, USA.

Results

FP successfully delineated salient patch networks and functional connectivity for white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus borealis) in our fragmented study area, and complements a similar tool, PatchMorph (PM), developed for rural landscape with more uniform land cover.

Conclusions

A trade-off exists when choosing to use FP or PM and the decision must rely upon a well-defined research question. FP is better suited for isolating patches of habitat when the surrounding matrix is of low quality and suitable areas are highly scattered on the landscape. PM is able to identify patches when the matrix is more uniform, and is better at identifying broader scale connectivity than FP. We expect species biologists and urban landscape planners to use FP to better define patch networks and to understand the implications of fragmentation on a range of species population concerns, including conflicts with human uses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addicott JF, Aho JM, Antolin MF, Padilla DK, Richardson JS, Soluk DA (1987) Ecological neighborhoods: scaling environmental patterns. Oikos 49(3):340–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauder JM, Breininger DR, Bolt MR, Legare ML, Jenkins CL, Rothermel BB, McGarigal K (2018) Multi-level, multi-scale habitat selection by a wide-ranging, federally threatened snake. Landscape Ecol 33(5):743–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrend DF, Lubeck RA (1968) Summer flight behavior of white-tailed deer in two Adirondack forests. J Wildl Manag 32(3):615–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beier P, McCullough DR (1990) Factors influencing white-tailed deer activity patterns and habitat use. Wildl Monogr 109:1–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Bissonette JA (1997) Scale-sensitive ecological properties: historical context, current meaning. In: Bissonette JA (ed) Wildlife and landscape ecology: effects of pattern and scale. Springer, New York, pp 3–31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brown B, Bryntesson F, Cooper S, Nyholm B, Robertson D, Bedford A, Hendricks D, Klippenstein L, Potapov E (2011) Moonlight and suburban white-tailed deer movements. Bull N J Acad Sci 56:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland WS, McGill R (1984) Graphical perception: theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. J Am Stat Assoc 79(387):531–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornicelli L, Woolf A, Roseberry JL (1996) White-tailed deer use of a suburban environment in southern Illinois. Trans Ill State Acad Sci 89:93–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding A, Bell J (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv 24(1):38–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaughan CR, DeStefano S (2005) Movement patterns of rural and suburban white-tailed deer in Massachusetts. Urban Ecosyst 8(2):191–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girvetz E, Greco S (2007) How to define a patch: a spatial model for hierarchically delineating organism-specific habitat patches. Landscape Ecol 22:1131–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girvetz E, Greco S (2009) Multi-scale predictive habitat suitability modeling based on hierarchically delineated patches: an example for yellow-billed cuckoos nesting in riparian forests, California, USA. Landscape Ecol 24:1315–1329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grund MD, McAninch JB, Wiggers EP (2002) Seasonal movements and habitat use of female white-tailed deer associated with an urban park. J Wildl Manag 66:123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson E (1998) Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosyst 1(2):143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen-Zanker A (2016) A computational framework for generalized moving windows and its application to landscape pattern analysis. Intl J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 44:205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill DB (1985) Forest fragmentation and its implications in Central New York. For Ecol Manag 12(2):113–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland JD, Bert DG, Fahrig L (2004) Determining the spatial scale of species’ response to habitat. BioSci 54(3):227–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland JD, Yang S (2016) Multi-scale studies and the ecological neighborhood. Curr Landsc Ecol Rep 1(4):135–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homer CG, Dewitz JA, Yang L, Jin S, Danielson P, Xian G, Coulston J, Herold ND, Wickham JD, Megown K (2015) Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States-Representing a decade of land cover change information. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 81(5):345–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Howland HC, Merola S, Basarab JR (2004) The allometry and scaling of the size of vertebrate eyes. Vis Res 44:2043–2065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kie JG, Bowyer RT, Nicholson MC, Boroski BB, Loft ER (2002) Landscape heterogeneity at differing scales: effects on spatial distribution of mule deer. Ecol 83(2):530–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilheffer CR (2014) Effects of landscape composition and structure on abundance and distribution of urban white-tailed deer. Thesis, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry

  • Kilpatrick HJ, Spohr SM (2000) Spatial and temporal use of a suburban landscape by female white-tailed deer. Wildl Soc Bull 28(4):1023–1029

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiltie RA (2000) Scaling of visual acuity with body size in mammals and birds. Funct Ecol 14:226–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotliar NB, Wiens JA (1990) Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos 59(2):253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson TJ, Rongstad OJ, Terbilcox WF (1978) Movement and habitat use of white-tailed deer in Southcentral Wisconsin. J Wildl Manag 42:113–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lausch A, Blaschke T, Haase D, Herzog F, Syrbe R, Tischendorf L, Walz U (2015) Understanding and quantifying landscape structure—a review on relevant processes characteristics, data models and landscape metrics. Ecol Model 295:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW, Chipman JW (2014) Remote sensing and image interpretation, 7th edn. Wiley, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu D, Hetrick S, Moran E (2010) Land cover classification in a complex urban-rural landscape with QuickBird Imagery. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 76(10):1159–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magle SB, Theobald DM, Crooks KR (2009) A comparison of metrics predicting landscape connectivity for a highly interactive species along an urban gradient in Colorado, USA. Landscape Ecol 24(2):267–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin J, Vourc’h G, Bonnot N, Cargnelutti B, Chaval Y, Lourtet B, Goulard M, Hoch T, Plantard O, Hewison AJM, Morellet N (2018) Temporal shifts in landscape connectivity for an ecosystem engineer, the roe deer, across a multiple-use landscape. Landscape Ecol 1–18

  • McGarigal K, Wan HY, Zeller KA, Timm BC, Cushman SA (2016) Multi-scale habitat selection modeling: a review and outlook. Landscape Ecol 31(6):1161–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA] (2010) National weather service. Monthly/annual averages, Syracuse, New York. http://www.weather.gov/. Accessed 24 Feb 2016

  • New York State Clearinghouse [NYSC] (2012) [Onondaga County] [aerial imagery] 0.1524-meter. Albany, New York: New York State Office of Cyber Security, 21 March–13 April 2012

  • Nyland RD, Zipperer WC, Hill DB (1986) The development of forest islands in exurban Central New York state. Landsc Urban Plan 13:111–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piccolo BP, Hollis KM, Warner RE, Van Deelen TR, Etter DR (2000) Variation of white-tailed deer home ranges in fragmented urban habitats around Chicago, Illinois. Wildl Damage Manag Conf Proc. Lincoln, Nebraska, pp 351–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirnat J, Hladnik D (2016) Connectivity as a tool in the prioritization and protection of sub-urban forest patches in landscape conservation planning. Landsc Urban Plan 153:129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter WF, Underwood HB, Woodard JL (2004) Movement behavior, dispersal, and the potential for localized management of deer in a suburban environment. J Wildl Manag 68:247–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn ACD, Williams DM, Porter WF (2013) Landscape structure influences space use of white-tailed deer. J Mammal 94(2):398–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads CL, Bowman JL, Eyler B (2010) Home range and movement rates of female exurban white-tailed deer. J Wildl Manag 74(5):987–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts TH (2001) The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat 158(1):87–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roseberry JL, Woolf A (1998) Habitat-population density relationships for white-tailed deer in Illinois. Wildl Soc Bull 26(2):252–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Saura S (2002) Effects of minimum mapping unit on land cover data spatial configuration and composition. Int J Remote Sens 23(22):4853–4880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scales KL, Hazen EL, Jacox MG, Edwards CA, Boustany AM, Oliver MJ, Bograd SJ (2016) Scale of inference: on the sensitivity of habitat moels for wide-ranging marine predators to the resultion of environmental data. Ecography 39:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoesmith MW, Koonz WH (1977) The maintenance of an urban deer herd in Winnipeg, Manitoba. North Am Wildl Conf 42:278–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehman S, Czaplewski R (1998) Design and analysis for thematic map accuracy assessment. Remote Sens Environ 64(3):331–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, O’Neill RV, Gardner RH, Milne BT (1989) Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecol 3(3–4):153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood HB, Kilheffer CR (2016) Modeling the effects of landscape composition on habitat suitability of urban ungulate populations. In: Francis RA, Millington JDA, Chadwick MA (eds) Urban landscape ecology: science, policy and practice. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 181–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbanek RE, Nielsen CK (2013) Influence of landscape factors on density of suburban white-tailed deer. Landsc Urban Plan 114:28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Druff LW, Rowse RN (1986) Habitat association of mammals in Syracuse, New York. Urban Ecol 9(3):413–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Veilleux CC, Kirk EC (2014) Visual acuity in mammals: effects of eye size and ecology. Brain Behav Evol 83:43–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walter WD, Beringer J, Hansen LP, Fischer JW, Millspaugh JJ, VerCauteren KC (2011) Factors affecting space use overlap by white-tailed deer in an urban landscape. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 25:379–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter WD, VerCauteren KC, Campa H III, Clark WR, Fischer JW, Hygnstrom SE, Mathews NE, Nielsen CK, Schauber EM, Van Deelen TR, Winterstein SR (2009) Regional assessment on influence of landscape configuration and connectivity on range size of white-tailed deer. Landscape Ecol 24(10):1405–1420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (1976) Population responses to patchy environments. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 7:81–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3(4):385–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • With KA (1997) The application of neutral landscape models in conservation biology. Conserv Biol 11(5):1069–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • With KA, Cadaret SJ, Davis C (1999) Movement responses to patch structure in experimental fractal landscapes. Ecol 80(4):1340–1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xun B, Yu D, Wang X (2017) Prioritizing habitat conservation outside protected areas in rapidly urbanizing landscapes: a patch network approach. Landsc Urban Plan 157:532–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zipperer WC, Sisinni SM, Pouyat RV, Foresman TW (1997) Urban tree cover: an ecological perspective. Urban Ecosyst 1:229–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Pevzner, C. Sternberg, and all other student volunteers who assisted during deer counts. We also thank the Department of Environmental & Forest Biology at The State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry for supporting C. Kilheffer through a Graduate Teaching Assistantship. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental and Forest Biology, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry (SUNY ESF), 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA

    Chellby Kilheffer

  2. Department of Environmental and Forest Biology, U.S. Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, SUNY ESF, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA

    H. Brian Underwood

Authors
  1. Chellby Kilheffer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Brian Underwood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chellby Kilheffer.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kilheffer, C., Underwood, H.B. Hierarchical patch delineation in fragmented landscapes. Landscape Ecol 33, 1533–1541 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0679-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0679-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation