Skip to main content
Log in

A Physical Approach to the Construction of Cognition and to Cognitive Evolution

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is shown that the method of operationaldefinition of theoretical terms applied inphysics may well support constructivist ideasin cognitive sciences when extended toobservational terms. This leads to unexpectedresults for the notion of reality, inductionand for the problem why mathematics is sosuccessful in physics.A theory of cognitive operators is proposedwhich are implemented somewhere in our brainand which transform certain states of oursensory apparatus into what we call perceptionsin the same sense as measurement devicestransform the interaction with the object intomeasurement results. Then, perceivedregularities, as well as the laws of nature wewould derive from them can be seen asinvariants of the cognitive operators concernedand are by this human specific constructsrather than ontologically independent elements.(e.g., the law of energy conservation can bederived from the homogeneity of time and bythis depends on our mental time metricgenerator). So, reality in so far it isrepresented by the laws of nature has no longeran independent ontological status. This isopposed to Campbell's `natural selectionepistemology'. From this it is shown that thereholds an incompleteness theorem for physicallaws similar to Gödels incompletenesstheorem for mathematical axioms, i.e., there isno definitive or object `theory of everything'.This constructivist approaches to cognitionwill allow a coherent and consistent model ofboth cognitive and organic evolution. Whereasthe classical view sees the two evolutionrather dichotomously (for ex.: most scientistssee cognitive evolution converging towards adefinitive world picture, whereas organicevolution obviously has no specific focus (the`pride of creation').

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Barrow, J.D.: 1990, Theories of Everything. Oxford University Press.

  • Campbell, D.T.: 1973, Evolutionary Epistemology. In P. Schilp (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper, Part I. La Salle: Open Court, 413–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, A.F.: 1982, What is This Thing Called Science? Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P.C.W.: 1990a, Why is the Physical World So Comprehensible? In W. H. Zurek (ed.), Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information, Santa Fe Institute studies in the Sciences of Complexity, Vol VIII. Addison Wesley, 61–70.

  • Davies, P.C.W.: 1990b, Why is the Universe Knowable? In Ronald E. Mickens (ed.), Mathematic and Science. World Scientific Press, 14–33.

  • Diettrich O.: 1994a, Heisenberg and Gödel in the Light of Constructivist Evolutionary Epistemology. Ludus Vitalis 2(2): 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diettrich, O.: 1989, Kognitive, Organische und Gesellschaftliche Evolution. Berlin Hamburg: Parey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diettrich, O.: 1994b, Is There a Theory of Everything? Bulletin of the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications 80: 166–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diettrich, O.: 1997, Sprache als Theorie. Papiere zur Linguistik 56(1): 77–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diettrich. O.: 1993, Cognitive and Communicative Development in Reality free Representation. Cognitiva 5(2): 219–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A. and M. Bosso: 1972, Correspondance 1903-1955. Paris.

  • Feynman, R.P.: 1965, The Character of Physical Law. BBC Publication.

  • Glasersfeld, E. von: 1995, Radical Constructivism. London: The Palmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N.: 1984, Weisen der Welterzeugung. Frankfurt/M. Suhrkamp. English original: Goodman, N.: 1978, Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawking, S.W.: 1979, Is the End in Sight for Theoretical Physics? Inaugural Lecture for the Lucasian Chair. University of Cambridge.

  • Hofstadter, D.R.: 1979, Gödel, Escher, Bach. London: The Harvester Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hösle, V.: 1988, Tragweite und Grenzen der evolutionären Erkenntnistheorie. Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie XIX: 343–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K.: 1983, Kants Lehre vom Apriorischen im Lichte der gegenwärtigen Biologie. In K. Lorenz and F. M. Wuketits, (eds.), Die Evolution des Denkens. München: Piper. Original published as: Lorenz, K.: 1941, Kant's Lehre vom Apriorischen im Lichte gegenwärtiger Biologie. Blätter für Deutsche Philosophie 15: 94-125. English translation: Lorenz, K.: 1982, Kant's Doctrine of the A Priori in the Light of Contemporary Biology. In Plotkin, H. (ed), Learning, Development, and Culture. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K.R.: 1966, Ñber tierisches und menschliches Verhalten. Gesammelte Abhandlungen. München. Piper. F. M. (eds.): 1983, Die Evolution des Denkens. München: Piper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, P. and O. Schwemmer: 1975, Konstruktive Logik, Ethik und Wissenschaftstheorie. Frankfurt.

  • Lucas, J.R.: 1961, Minds, Machines and Gödel. Philosophy 36: 120–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E. and J. Newman: 1958, Gödel's Proof. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oeser, E.: 1984, The Evolution of Scientific Method. In F.M. Wuketits (ed.), Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oeser, E.: 1988, Das Abenteuer der kollektiven Vernunft. Berlin, Hamburg: Parey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R.: 1989, The Emperor's New Mind. Oxford University Press.

  • Piaget, J.: 1967, Biologie und Erkenntnis. Frankfurt: S. Fischer. English translation: Piaget, J.: 1971, Biology and Knowledge. An Essay on the Relations between Organic Regulations and Cognitive Processes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. French original: Piaget, J.: 1967, Biologie et connaisance: Essai sur les relations entre les régulation organiques et les processus cognitifs. Paris: Editions Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.: 1970, Genetic Epistemology. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.: 1974, Die Bildung des Zeitbegriffes beim Kinde. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft (STW) 77. French original: Piaget, J.: 1955, La Génèse du Temps chez l'Enfant. Presses Universitaires de France.

  • Popper, K.R.: 1982, Logik der Forschung. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr. Originally published: Popper, K. R.: 1934, Logik der Forschung. Vienna: Julius Springer Verlag. English translation: Popper, K. R.: 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R.: 1973, Objektive Erkenntnis. Hamburg: Hoffman und Campe. English original: Popper, K.R.: 1972, Objective Knowledge. The Clarendon Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I.: 1979, Vom Sein zumWerden. München, Zürich: Piper. English translation: Prigogine, I.: 1980, From Being to Becoming - Time and Complexity in Physical Sciences. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl, R.: 1980, Biologie der Erkenntnis. Berlin, Hamburg: Parey. English translation: Riedl, R.: 1984, Biology of Knowledge. The Evolutionary Basis of Reason. London:Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, H.J.: 1992, Phantasie und Kalkül: über die Polarität von Handlung und Struktur in der Sprache. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.

  • Searle, J.R.: 1971, Sprechakte. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. English original: Searle, J.R.: 1969, Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Solomonoff, R.: 1964, A Formal Theory of Inductive Inference. Information and Control 7: 224–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, H.: 1872, Principles of Psychology. Vol. 2, 2nd ed., Sect. 332, p. 195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W.: 1969, Metaphysik, Skepsis, Wissenschaft. 2. verb. Aufl. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uexküll, J. von: 1921, Umwelt und Innenleben der Tiere. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer, G.: 1975, Evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie. Stuttgart: S. Hirzel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, C.H.: 1959, Evolutionary Systems-Animal and Human. Nature 182: 1634–1638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weizsäcker, C.F. von: 1985, Aufbau der Physik. München: Hanser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigner, E.: 1960, The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 13: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuketits, F.: 1984, Evolutionary Epistemology. In F. Wuketits (ed.), Concepts and Approaches in Evolutionary Epistemology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diettrich, O. A Physical Approach to the Construction of Cognition and to Cognitive Evolution. Foundations of Science 6, 273–341 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011610921631

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011610921631

Navigation