Skip to main content
Log in

Pulsing of multiple nutrients as a strategy to achieve large biologically active zones during in situ carbon tetrachloride remediation

  • Published:
Computational Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When injecting nutrients during active bioremediation, various nutrient addition strategies can be employed in order to remediate the site at minimal expense. In particular, if more than one nutrient is required, a pulse addition strategy can be devised in which these nutrients are added as temporally separated pulses such that the biostimulated portion of the flow field can be maximized. In this manuscript, results of numerical simulations are reported which demonstrate this effect. Previously published kinetic expressions describing microbial growth and carbon tetrachloride degradation under denitrifying conditions are used in these simulations. The simulations indicate that volumetric treatment can be accomplished by injecting long duration nutrient pulses of different nutrients that are separated by a long period where only unamended water is injected. This strategy will cause the nutrient pulses to overlap at a considerable distance from the injection point, while maintaining concentrations that are high enough to ensure significantbiomass growth and contaminant destruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E.J. Bouwer, Bioremediation of chlorinated solvents using alternative electron acceptors, in: Handbook of Bioremediation, ed. J.E. Mathews (Lewis, Ann Arbor, MI, 1994) pp. 149–175.

  2. T.P. Clement, B.S. Hooker and R.S. Skeen, Numerical modeling of biologically reactive transport near a nutrient injection well, ASCE J. Envir. Engrg. 122(9) (1996) 833–839.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M.L Duthy, Modeling bioremediation of nitrate-contaminated waste and groundwater, AGSO Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics 14 (1993) 249–257.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B.S. Hooker, R.S. Skeen and J.N. Petersen, Biological destruction of CCl4, Part 2. Kinetic modeling, Biotechnol. Bioengrg. 44 (1994) 211–218.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B.S. Hooker, R.S. Skeen, M.J. Truex and B.M. Peyton, A demonstration of in situ bioremediation of CCl4 at the Hanford site, in: Proc. 33rd Hanford Symposium on Health and the Environment, Richland, WA (November 1994).

  6. A. Mayio, National water quality inventory, 1988 Report to Congress, EPA Report No. EPA-440-4-90-003, Environmental Protection Agency, Ada, OK (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  7. P.L. McCarty and L. Semprini, Engineering and hydrogeological problems associated with in situ treatment, Hydrological Sciences 38 (1993) 261–272.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.N. Petersen, R.S. Skeen, K.M. Amos and B.S. Hooker, Biological destruction of CCl4, Part 1: Experimental design and data, Biotechnol. Bioengrg. 43 (1994) 521–528.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B.M. Peyton, Improved biomass distribution using pulsed injections of electron donor and acceptor, Water Research 30 (1996) 756–758.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P.V. Roberts, G.D. Hopkins, L. Semprini, P.L. McCarty and D.M. Mackay, Pulsing of electron donor and electron acceptor for enhanced biotransformation of chemicals, United States Patent No. 5006250 (1991).

  11. J.L. Sherwood, J.N. Petersen and R.S. Skeen, Effects of nitrate and acetate availability on chloroform production during carbon tetrachloride destruction, Biotechnol. Bioengrg. 51 (1996) 551–557.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M.J. Shouche, J.N. Petersen and R.S. Skeen, Use of a mathematical model for prediction of optimum feeding strategies for in situ bioremediation, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 39/40 (1993) 763–779.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M.S. Shouche, J.N. Petersen, R.S. Skeen and B.S. Hooker, Alternating extraction/injection well interactions for in situ bioremediation, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 45/46 (1994) 775–785.

    Google Scholar 

  14. [14] R.S. Skeen, S.P. Luttrell, T.M. Brouns, B.S. Hooker and J.N. Petersen, In-situ bioremediation of Hanford groundwater, Remediation 3 (1993) 353–367.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R.S. Skeen, K.M. Amos and J.N. Petersen, Influence of nitrate concentration on carbon tetrachloride transformation by a denitrifying microbial consortium, Water Research 28 (1994) 2433–2438.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R.S. Skeen, N.B. Valentine, B.S. Hooker and J.N. Petersen, Kinetics of nitrate inhibition of carbon tetrachloride transformation by a denitrifying consortium, Biotechnol. Bioengrg. 45 (1995) 279–284.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D.W. Tempest and O.E. Neijssel, The status of Y atp and maintenance energy as biologically interpretable phenomena, Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 38 (1984) 459–486.

    Google Scholar 

  18. F. van der Leeden, F.L. Troise and K.D. Todd, Section C. Ground-Water Contamination (Lewis, Chelsea, MI, 1990).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franzen, M.E., Petersen, J.N., Clement, T.P. et al. Pulsing of multiple nutrients as a strategy to achieve large biologically active zones during in situ carbon tetrachloride remediation. Computational Geosciences 1, 271–288 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011573429996

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011573429996

Navigation