Abstract
Various instruments measuring either technological literacy or pupils’ attitudes towards technology are available. Recent research has emphasised that these instruments have not been validated for the South African context, yielded invalid and unreliable data for this specific context, and should therefore be adapted (Ankiewicz, Myburgh & Van Rensburg, 1996; Van Rensburg, Ankiewicz & Myburgh, 1996a, 1996b, 1999).
The concept technology profile refers to learners’ knowledge and understanding of technology, their awareness of it, their values and attitudes towards technology, and their technological capability. It also refers to the extent to which these aspects have become part of the learners’ personality, beliefs, perceptions and behaviour. At the PATT (South Africa) Conference, held during October 1996, the developments regarding the design of an Attitudinal Technology Profile (ATP) questionnaire to evaluate the effects of curricula on the technology profile of learners in South African schools, were reported. At the time of the conference, the ATP questionnaire still had to be applied in order to establish its reliability and validity (Ankiewicz et al., 1996, p. 90). This article reports on this application of the ATP questionnaire.
A quantitative pilot study was undertaken among 439 South African learners in Grades 9 and 10 in the Gauteng Province in the Johannesburg/Soweto area to determine their attitudinal technology profile. Differences among the learners with regard to their exposure to Technology Education, as well as gender differences, were also investigated. The conclusion is that the ATP questionnaire provides more reliable and valid results than its western counterpart that have been applied in South Africa.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Allport, G. W.: 1935, in C. Murchison (ed.), A Handbook of Social Psychology, Clark University Press, Worcester, Mass.
Ankiewicz, P. J., Myburgh, C. P. H. & Van Rensburg, S. J.: 1996, The Design of an Instrument to Evaluate the Effects of Curricula on the Technology Profile of Learners in South African Schools. PATT (South Africa) Conference Proceedings, 84–92, 14–17 October 1996.
Bagozzi, R. P. & Burnkrant, R. E.: 1979, ‘Attitude Organization and the Attitude-behaviour Relationship’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37, 913–929.
Barnett, M.: 1994, ‘Designing the Future? Technology, Values and Choice’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 4(1), 51–64.
Biehler, R. F. & Snowman, J.: 1993, Psychology Applied to Teaching, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Breckler, S. J.: 1984, ‘Empirical Validation of Affect, Behaviour, and Cognition as Distinct Components of Attitude’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47(6), 1191–1205.
Child, D.: 1973, Essentials of Factor Analysis, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.
Chung-Shan, S.: 1996, A Study on the Objectives of Technological Literacy Education at the Elementary School Level. JISTEC Conference proceedings, S1–117, 8–11 January 1996.
Conway, R.: 1994, ‘Values in Technology Education’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 4(1), 109–116.
Corsini, R. J. & Ozaki, B. D. (eds.): 1984, Encyclopedia of Psychology, Vol. 1, John Wiley, New York.
De Vries, M., Dugger, W. E. & Bame, A.: 1993, PATT Questionnaire (Revised version).
DeLuca, V. W.: 1992, ‘Survey of Technology Education. Problem-solving activities’, The Technology Teacher 51(5), 26–30.
Dyrenfurth, M. J.: 1995, Initial Evaluation Report: RSA PROTEC Technology Education Pilot, University of Missouri, Columbia.
Eisenberg, E.: 1996, Essential Features of Technology Education. ORT-STEP, Midrand, South Africa.
Eysenck, H. J. & Arnold, W. (eds.): 1972, Encyclopedia of Psychology, Vol. 1, Search Press, London.
Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I.: 1973, ‘Attitudes and Opinions’, Annual Review of Psychology 24, 487–544.
Gagné, R. M.: 1977, The Conditions of Learning, Holt, Rinehart & Wilson, New York.
Heaven, P. C. C.: 1982, Houdings, Academia, Pretoria (Afrikaans).
HEDCOM (Heads of Education Departments Committee): 1996, Draft National Framework for Curriculum Development in Technology Education, A Report by the Technology 2005 Project Committee, Pretoria.
Johnson, S. D. & Thomas, R.: 1992, ‘Technology Education and the Cognitive Revolution’, The Technology Teacher 51(4), 7–12.
Kent, D. & Towse, P.: 1996, Pupil-centred Aims and Objectives for Technology Education in Botswana and Lesotho. PATT (South Africa) Conference proceedings, 184–189, 14–17 October 1996.
McCormick, R., Murphy, P. & Hennessy, S.: 1994, ‘Problem-solving Processes in Technology Education: A Pilot Study’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 4(1), 5–34.
Moir, A. & Jessel, D.: 1989, Brain Sex: The Real Difference between Men and Women, Mandarin, London.
NEPI (National Education Policy Initiative).: 1992, ’Report of the Science Curriculum Group’, EDUNET, Johannesburg.
Ostrom, T. M.: 1969, ‘The Relationship between the Affective, Behavioral, and Cognitive Components of Attitude’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 5, 12–13.
RAU (Rand Afrikaans University, South Africa): 1996, Report on a Workshop on Teacher Training for Technology Education in South Africa, RAU, South Africa, 25 January 1996.
Rokeach, M.: 1970, Beliefs, Attitudes and Values, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Shaw, M. E. & Wright, J. M.: 1967, Scales for the Measurement of Attitudes, McGraw Hill, New York.
Van Rensburg, S. J., Ankiewicz, P. J. & Myburgh, C. P. H.: 1996a, Curriculum Development for Technology Education in South Africa, Gender issues Conference Proceedings of the Gender and Science and Technology International Conference (Ahmedabad, India), 161–175, 5–10 January 1996.
Van Rensburg, S. J., Ankiewicz, P. J. & Myburgh, C. P. H.: 1996b, Addressing Gender Issues in Curriculum Development for Technology Education in South Africa, PATT (South Africa) Conference Proceedings, 73–80, 14–17 October 1996.
Van Rensburg, S. J., Ankiewicz, P. J. & Myburgh, C. P. H.: 1999, ‘Assessing South African Learners’ Attitudes towards Technology by using the PATT (Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology) Questionnaire’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 9, 137–151.
Waks, L. J.: 1994, ‘Value Judgement and Social Action in Technology Studies’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 4(1), 35–50.
White, R. T.: 1988, Learning Science, Basil Blackwell, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ankiewicz, P., van Rensburg, S. & Myburgh, C. Assessing the Attitudinal Technology Profile of South African Learners: A Pilot Study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 11, 93–109 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011210013642
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011210013642