Skip to main content
Log in

Designing the future? Technology, values and choice

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a widespread recognition of the desirability of broadening the scope of technology education with the objective of a form of ‘technological literacy’ which would embrace social relations as well as technique. In 1990, Technology was introduced as a compulsory element of general education in England and Wales. Initially the curriculum gave equal weight both to the context as well as the content of technological activity, but subsequent revisions point the way back to an emphasis on technique and a narrower view of the role of the designer. In some respects, this simplifies the task of the technology teacher, and it might also be said to reflect the everyday realities of much technological activity. It is, however, an essentially conservative approach which tends to reinforce and legitimise attitudes which place a high value on technical performance while consigning the purposes and outcomes of technological activity to the shadows. It is argued that, for the sake of the future, it is essential that values in design and technology are ‘brought up to the light’. Technology teachers should take some responsibility for this, but cannot be expected to shoulder the whole burden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Medway, P.: 1989, ‘Issues in the Theory and Practice of Technology Education’,Studies in Science Education 1, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  2. DES/WO: 1990,Technology in the National Curriculum, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Smithers, A. and Robinson, P.: 1992,National Curriculum Technology: Getting it Right, Engineering Council, London.

    Google Scholar 

  4. WOCATE: 1993,Newsletter 1(1).

  5. DES: 1988,National Curriculum Design and Technology Working Group: Interim Report, Department of Education and Science, London.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mathews, J., Hall, G. & Smith, H.: 1988, ‘Towards Flexible Skill Formation and Technological Literacy: Challenges Facing the Education System’,Economic and Industrial Democracy 9(4), 497–522.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Budgett-Meakin, C. (ed.): 1992,Make the Future Work, Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mumford, L.: 1934,Technics and Civilization, Harcourt Brace, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Layton, D.: 1992, ‘Values in Design and Technology’, in: Budgett-Meakin C. (ed.),Making the Future Work 3, Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shephard, T.: 1989,Introducing Design, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mulberg, C.: 1992, ‘Beyond the Looking Glass: Technological Myths in Education’, in: Budgett-Meakin C. (ed.),Make the Future Work 2, Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  12. DFE/WO: 1992,Technology for Ages 5 to 16, Department for Education.

  13. Ditchfield, C. & Stewart, D.: 1987, ‘Technology and Science in the Curriculum; Some Issues and Ideas’,Secondary Science Curriculum Review, London.

  14. Layton, D.: 1988, ‘Revaluing the T in STS’,Int. Journal of Science Education 10, 367–378.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Winner, L.: 1992,Autonomous Technology, MIT Press.

  16. Noble, D. F.: 1979,America by Design, Oxford.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barnett, M. Designing the future? Technology, values and choice. Int J Technol Des Educ 4, 51–63 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01197583

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01197583

Keywords

Navigation